WoWeee;
I agree with some of your issues to a point.
Sometimes the articles contained in the issue are quite sparce or simplistic. However, there are an equal number of articles that have contained tips and/or techniques that are quite unique. I have the entire series of FSM minus the original trial issue. I have noticed some "recycling" of articles over the length of the magazine, however in defence of FSM most have been updated to incorporate new items and usage to keep the hobby current.
As far as subjects to be covered the simplest solution I think would be submission by you, me or any of the members here. This will keep the magazine moving forward and limit the repitition or vagueness.
In regards to the issue of how far will modeler's go?
I personally, really enjoy seeing the extremes that some modellers take ordinary kits to. This level of detail showcases not only the individual modeler as a skilled and detail oriented craftsman/ woman but also affords the challenge to better ones own skills to achieve a higher standard and ultimately an awe inspiring piece at the end.
I have over the years seen many magazines for modellers. The worst offender by far was Military Modeler / Scale Modeler for recycling old materiel and limiting itself to only a handful of new submissions monthly while showcasing the same modeller month after month. The magazine finally ended and left a void that FSM has filled and re-defined quite well.
After all of the foregoing my best advice would be to send in a submission to the Editorial Staff and solicit the magazine to add new items monthly. Ask for the additions of sections for beginners, intermediates, advanced and a showcases of masterclass modelers works. Tips and Techniques for and from each of these groups. Maybe even a few yearly special issues of just reference photos, drawings, paint schemes for one specific type or subject.
After all FSM is just a magazine. It's readership is what drives it and fills its pages and prolongs its. It's up to us to foster the direction it takes us in.
Now I will get down off my soapbox and get back to the workbench.
Cheers;
Gregory