redleg12 wrote:
MM
OK build overall but....I started my military career (long ago)
on one of these. A few quick things.
I don't know if it is the lighting but it almost looks tan.
These were phased out of service with the US Army in the late
70s. Their color was always OD Green. Isreal also used the
M107, and this color is closer to their M107 than the US
version
WAY too many scratches. You would NEVER see a weapon looking in
that shape. Scatches would always be touched up. The only place
where it would be scrached and metal somewhat exposed would be
on the recoil spade.
The hydralic elevating cylinders (on either side of the
barrel), the inside part of the cylinder will be shiny
(polished). Any other state and they would not work.
He has a mix of white bumper numbers on the front and back with
black numbers and star on the side. They would not be
mixed...either all white or all black.
Barrel sled (under the barrel, groved area) would be a gunmetal
color overall but the grove and high spots would be polished
from the movement in the housing.
Need to do a better job on the seams between the side skirt and
main hull
As I said eye pleasing, but....not correct
Rounds Complete!!
Many thanks for your kind comments, suggestions and
information! They'll be useful and handy for those who want to
build the M107/109/110.
----------
Robbioo wrote:
well.. aside from the acuracy things mentioned above, i think
the model looks great.
all the techniques on wich some of us (including me) struggle
to get right look good to me. chipping, washes, ect.. lookin
good there modelmaniac.
as for the post above, it's by now well known modelmaniac
doesn't build the models himself, a while ago when he stopped
posting because of these "not nice" remarks, everybody started
asking where he was. also i think almost everybody (speaking
for myself anyway) could only dream of such a collection.. made
by yourself of someone else who get's payed.
nuf said.. i'm going back building
Many thanks for your kind comments and understanding! I really
appreciate them!
----------
Rob Gronovius wrote:
May be just to share the work (whomever's) with the members
here. He is obviously a fan of scale armor modeling and wants a
larger audience to see the builders' work. Perhaps he does not
have the skills or the time to build the kits himself and
appreciates a more authentic looking model than a Forces of
Valor model.
Who knows (other than Model Maniac) as to the reasons, and why
should any of us care? If you don't like to look at his models,
don't. Snide remarks appear petty and should be beneath us.
Many thanks for your kind and thoughtful comments, Rob! I just
can't thank you enough. It's exactly what you pointed out, I
appreciate an authentic looking model specially built for me
than the mass-produced die-cast toy.
-----------
grandadjohn wrote:
Rob Gronovius wrote:
May be just to share the work (whomever's) with the members
here. He is obviously a fan of scale armor modeling and wants a
larger audience to see the builders' work. Perhaps he does not
have the skills or the time to build the kits himself and
appreciates a more authentic looking model than a Forces of
Valor model.
Who knows (other than Model Maniac) as to the reasons, and why
should any of us care? If you don't like to look at his models,
don't. Snide remarks appear petty and should be beneath us.
Roger that!
Many thanks for your kind comments, grandadjohn!
-----------
tigerman wrote:
Rob Gronovius wrote:
May be just to share the work (whomever's) with the members
here. He is obviously a fan of scale armor modeling and wants a
larger audience to see the builders' work. Perhaps he does not
have the skills or the time to build the kits himself and
appreciates a more authentic looking model than a Forces of
Valor model.
Who knows (other than Model Maniac) as to the reasons, and why
should any of us care? If you don't like to look at his models,
don't. Snide remarks appear petty and should be beneath us.
I agree. Sometime last year, he did share some of his own work.
Perhaps he is busy or is publicly shy in presenting his own
work, I really don't have an answer. He does appear to like
armor modeling and if he's sharing others builds, what's wrong
with that? Not everyone is a pro, nor do they care to be one.
Many thanks for your kind comments too, tigerman! I see nothing
wrong with what I've been doing for so many years. After all,
the vast majority of members on this site understand me and
stand by me. ;-)
-----------
oleander13 wrote:
tigerman wrote:
Rob Gronovius wrote:
May be just to share the work (whomever's) with the members
here. He is obviously a fan of scale armor modeling and wants a
larger audience to see the builders' work. Perhaps he does not
have the skills or the time to build the kits himself and
appreciates a more authentic looking model than a Forces of
Valor model.
Who knows (other than Model Maniac) as to the reasons, and why
should any of us care? If you don't like to look at his models,
don't. Snide remarks appear petty and should be beneath us.
I agree. Sometime last year, he did share some of his own work.
Perhaps he is busy or is publicly shy in presenting his own
work, I really don't have an answer. He does appear to like
armor modeling and if he's sharing others builds, what's wrong
with that? Not everyone is a pro, nor do they care to be one.
I agree with both you and Rob's posts. I enjoy looking at a
model whether it's from an expert or a beginner. I'm a
beginner/rookie/novice/newbie myself, so seeing any type of
work benefits me.
I understand that MM is a huge fan of armor and I think that's
great. My only gripe with him, however, is that his posts are
pretty self-centered in nature. By that I mean he posts his
own models (whether built by him or not is irrelevant) and asks
for all forms of comments and criticism without returning the
favor in other threads. I would like to see him posting in
other threads commenting and passing those "attaboys" around to
others. But perhaps he's too busy to post in the other
threads...that's very possible.
Who am I to say what he should or shouldn't do
Many thanks for your kind comments, oleander13! If you read
every post in every thread, you'll see my comments in others'
threads too. Being an attaboy is not my style though. ;-)
-----------
JMart wrote:
This may be a "selfish" post, but I like to see MM posts
because of the FEEDBACK that the more experiences modelers
post. For example, I really learned from redleg12
response/critique of the build. But Im a newbie/hobby returnee,
so this type of feedback/critique maybe old news to the
regulars in here.... but remember it is the "not gold medal"
type of builds (and critiques) that give us the most valuable
lessons..
Many thanks for your kind comments, JMart! I agree with you
that redleg12's comments/feedbacks are friendly, useful and
constructive.
-----------
EasyMike wrote:
Hmmm. Enlightening in an odd way. Personally, I don't own
anything I didn't build, but I suppose the pleasure from the
hobby for some folks is to own and not build.
You're right, EasyMike. I'm not alone. In Thailand there are so
many model collectors who don't build themselves, and there are
many modelers who make a living by building models for others.
It's this kind of specialization of jobs and distribution of
income that keeps the economy going. And I believe this happens
around the world, not just in Thailand.
-----------
Rob Gronovius wrote:
HeavyArty wrote:
Coombaya....Coombaya....
No, it's actually like the Robert Heinlein quote, "Never try to
teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and it annoys the
pig."
In other words, the critiques fall on deaf ears on his side,
and the faults may not matter to him or else he would insist
they be improved upon in subsequent builds. You make good
observations and critiques in regards to the overall build, but
your snide remarks make you look like a lesser man.
To quote another old saying, choose your battles wisely. This
one's not worth winning or even starting. If you win, what? MM
stops posting photos here? He starts to build kits for himself?
AI starts to heed your critiques and posts his own photos? And
you look like the FSM neighborhood bully? Some win.
It's not much different from the photos you see in the
magazine's reader's gallery or any other non-award winning
modeler's build. There are probably casual modelers who see
AI's work as better than theirs, and they think to themselves,
"If AI's stuff gets ripped, there's no way I'm posting photos
of my work."
Many thanks again for your kind comments, Rob! I really like
them especially the last paragraph. AI's stuffs surely have
some admirers worldwide, otherwise my Web site would not have
been so popular as it is. I check my Web site's stats just now
and found out that the number of visitors this month amounts to
6,890 - that's around 230 persons per day. My Web site has been
around for almost 10 years and has become a destination for
many a modelers. Many people have told me that they discovered
my Web site by just searching for "models".
----------
chris hall wrote:
Another side of the coin might be -
an averagely-capable modeller sees the piccies and thinks ' My
models are better than that'. He gets encouraged, submits stuff
for 'readers' gallery'. These satisfy the sometimes less-than-
exacting standards of that section of the Magazine, and his
work gets published. Averagely-capable modeller becomes proud
of his work and confident in his ability, and is motivated to
get even better. Result all round!
Another possibility is that MM takes the criticism that the
models he posts here often, and justifiably, receive to heart,
and passes them on to the guys from whom he buys his completed
models. These, in turn, get their act together, and start to
produce better models. Again, result all round!
I'm afraid your another side of the coin is unlikely. AI's
stuffs and craftmanship are in anyway above average.
I do take comments and suggestions and I pass on some to my
builders, not just AI. As for AI, I've told him to pay more
attention in getting rid of the seams.
-----------
squeakie wrote:
redleg12 wrote:
MM
OK build overall but....I started my military career (long ago)
on one of these. A few quick things.
I don't know if it is the lighting but it almost looks tan.
These were phased out of service with the US Army in the late
70s. Their color was always OD Green. Isreal also used the
M107, and this color is closer to their M107 than the US
version
WAY too many scratches. You would NEVER see a weapon looking in
that shape. Scatches would always be touched up. The only place
where it would be scrached and metal somewhat exposed would be
on the recoil spade.
The hydralic elevating cylinders (on either side of the
barrel), the inside part of the cylinder will be shiny
(polished). Any other state and they would not work.
He has a mix of white bumper numbers on the front and back with
black numbers and star on the side. They would not be
mixed...either all white or all black.
Barrel sled (under the barrel, groved area) would be a gunmetal
color overall but the grove and high spots would be polished
from the movement in the housing.
Need to do a better job on the seams between the side skirt and
main hull
As I said eye pleasing, but....not correct
Rounds Complete!!
I noticed that the round didn't have a fuse on it, as well as
the brass driving band. The top of the craddle would be suffed
up without much paint there as the round is pushed off it. With
the breech cracked open the inside of it should be a nice clean
silver.
The water cans are the wrong color, and would have had some
kind of marking denoting water and also if it was potable
water. Also it was not normal for the water cans to be where
there are located during a fire mission. The concussion from a
zone three charge would have put them in the next county.
Didn't see the firing lock, and the hydraulic lines used to
elevate the tube on the AG's side (four or five of them 5/16"
diameter) looked tobe missing.
Now that I'm done with rivit counting it's a nice piece.
gary
Many thanks for your comments and information, gary! I like
your last sentence the most. ;-)
-----------
redleg12 wrote:
OK....Lets get technical....the M107 is a GUN and thus is the
longest SP GUN. The 2S7 and Panzer 2000 are HOWITZERS. We will
do the research to see the winner of that contest but...The
M107 is the LONGEST GUN. (Why do I feel like a rabbi at a group
circumcesion)....(I'm not going there Al)
Rounds Complete!!
I have no ideas about the differences between a howitzer and a
gun. How can you differentiate one for the other?, I wonder.
-----------
bbrowniii wrote:
ajlafleche wrote:
Except that the critiques are very often on extremely basic
flaws...silvered and crooked decals, mold and seam likes,
fogged windshields, parts installed upside down, poor to non-
existent stories in dioramas. These are not ripping critiques,
but genuinely basic mistakes from rushed building.
But I guess my reaction would be 'so what?' Not in the sense
that those flaws are not important, but in the sense that, hey,
they have been pointed out to MM time and time again, but he
doesn't seem interested or concerned. If they are good enough
for him, and he wants to post 'em here, more power to him.
Particularly because, by now, I am sure he knows he is going to
get ripped.... He doesn't seem interested in improving - so
what? Is it a pre-requisite to be a member of this site that
one must be seeking improvement?
I don't think it's true that I'm not interested or concerned, I
want my modelers to do their best. But some modelers have some
constraints such as time constraint, and it's not a pre-
requisite that one must be seeking improvement. When most
people think it's OK then I think it's OK too.
------------
Townsy11 wrote:
Well, dispite the accuracy issues, Overall I really like this
build! Tell A.I. he did some nice work, but to please research
his builds a little before hand.
Chris,
Many thanks for your kind comments, Chris! I also think the
same. As for research I'm afraid that AI don't have enough time
and language proficiency to do so.
------------
RonUSMC wrote:
When I see a thread like this, it makes me kind of sad.
There is absolutely no reason that someone should be harassed
because they are showing models. Its a hobby, some can do it,
some can enjoy it, some cannot do it. Its really just something
that someone is interested in and showing their prized
possessions. In reality, who are any of us to judge what is
good or what is bad or what someone deserves to show or not.
Let's all really just take a step back and thank ModelManiac
for showing off his models and let him enjoy himself however he
wants.
I also want to remind people, that there are some people in the
world that are physically incapable of building models due to
disabilities or handicaps. Do we throw stones at them as well?
No. They are as much a part of this community as the person I
gave 1st Place to at the Show last week.
Build what you want, how you want to do it, and even if you
dont.. just enjoy the hobby in any way you see fit.
Keep on posting ModelManiac, a lot of us appreciate it. I have
spent hours looking through your massive and incredible
collection.
On another note, I am starting to see a trend towards more
critical advice and a bit more... harshness. I wonder why that
is?
Thank you so much for your kind and thoughtful comments,
RonUSMC! I really appreciate them and I read them time and
again. I feel honored that you spent hours looking at my
collection. Sure I'll keep on posting for the years to come
because there are far more admirers than nay-sayers anyway.
In my MM Content-based Menu :
http://www.geocities.com/~falconbbs/modelcnt.htm" target="_blank" title="
http://www.geocities.com/~falconbbs/modelcnt.htm">
http://www.geocities.com/~falconbbs/modelcnt.htm
, I have a poem which I wrote so many years ago. It sums up my
belief about what I've been doing and it reads as follows:
In the sky, the mighty Falcon
Flies across the lost horizon;
Reaching the top of hostile sky
Creating "Model Maniac" Empire!
With fire power of all tanks' guns
With realisticity, and precision;
The world has greeted with love and joy
The power exists in all these toys!
Rounds Completed!!!