SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

1/24-1/25

1345 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
1/24-1/25
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 17, 2003 8:53 AM
This may seem like and odd question, but....

Does anybody have a preference between 1/24 & 1/25 scales?
Why are both scales made? Its literally a fraction of a difference, so why not just keep one?

Carlos
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington State
Posted by leemitcheltree on Thursday, July 17, 2003 9:56 PM
Ah, Carlos..........
You ask a question that has no apparent answer.
Why 1/24 instead of 1/25? And then again, why are most F1 cars molded in 1/20 scale? Is there anyone out there who has an answer? Does anyone have a contact at Revell-Monogram (like FSM's Lawrence Hansen) who might have an idea on the historical decisions that were made that decided 1/24 and 1/25 were the major scales for autos (besides the size of the models) and why not have a standard scale instead of two, or three??
Good question, carlos,
Cheers,
LeeTree

Cheers, LeeTree
Remember, Safety Fast!!!

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:01 PM
I have no idea, Carlos. It seems there's been an age-old dispute between the American model manufacturers (who seem to favor the 1/25 scale) and their Japanese and European counterparts who prefer the 1/24th scale. Oddly, it wouldn't seem to be immediately related to the different measurement scales, since 1/25 is more readily divisible on the metric scale than is 1/24 (1meter equals 25 mil. vs 1 meter equals 24 mil.), and likewise, 1/24 is more easily calculated on the American scale of inches/feet/yards (one foot equals 1/2 inch).
It would make some sense to me if the American manufacturers preferred 1/24 and the Japanese/Europeans used 1/25. I'm sure somebody on this board knows a lot more than me on the subject, 'cause it's a mystery to me.
Glenn
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Fall River, MA
Posted by klem on Thursday, July 17, 2003 10:18 PM
The answer to your quandry lies much deeper than you and I could possibley imagine. I must meditate on this....
"We the unwilling, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible, for the ungrateful. We've been doing so much for so long with so little we are now capable of doing anything with nothing." Unknown
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 18, 2003 7:07 AM
Wow!
I hadn't realized that it was that tough of a question! Although glheald's answer seems to make sense, LeeTree brought up a lot more questions! Hmmm....maybe a letter to the editor might be in order....

Carlos
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 18, 2003 7:16 AM
It could have been a ploy to appease both markets, each building thier kits to suit the other. Or, could be a result longstanding from the debate of what would be the standard measuring system for the industry. Seems odd that they would continue to use the american standard seeing how 99% of industry uses the metric system as a standard. But, as with everything else it is an opinion and we all know where that could end up.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, July 18, 2003 10:12 AM
Metric......is for wimps, and commies

:)
  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Friday, March 17, 2006 10:30 PM
and the debate lingers onBig Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: White Mountains, NH
Posted by jhande on Sunday, March 19, 2006 2:08 PM
Sure would be nice if someone that has access to the inside scoop could find out for us... better yet, if the companies would stick to one size.

It makes no sence to have two Corvettes sitting next to each other on a shelf, one in 1:24th scale and the other 1:25th scale and both made by the same company.

At first I thought, well maybe they're making the larger cars in 1:25th scale and the smaller cars in 1:24th scale. But no, next to me sits a '70 Buick GSX in 1:24 scale and a '68 Vette in 1:25 scale. Their sizes just don't look right sitting next to each other. Oh well... Sad [:(]



-- Jim --
"Put the pedal down & shake the ground!"

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: South Carolina
Posted by jlwilliams on Monday, March 20, 2006 11:15 AM

Several years ago I read the following explaination:

1/24th scale is 1/2 inch equals 1 foot.  (1 inch equals 1 foot would be 1/12th scale)

The common scale that car designers and engineers used for models is 1/10 scale.  The 1/25th scale is 2 1/2 times smaller than the engineering model.

Engineer scales are marked off in multiples of 10.  The common scales in use are 1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40, 1:50, 1:60.  The metric system is simular but uses some other scales in addition to the even 10s: 1:25, and 1:75 for example.

If you were ever wondering about 1/32nd scale..... it works out to be 3/8 inch equal 1 foot.

J. Lee Williams 2007 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build 2008 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build on time You load 16 tons and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! In my stash gallery: http://pics.jamesjweg.com/gallery/3989211
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.