SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Antonov An-2

7290 views
19 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2010
  • From: MN
Posted by Nathan T on Saturday, November 21, 2015 10:28 PM

Very nice work on this rare(model wise anyway) bird! I got the chance to fly one once and the view from the cockpit with all that glass is quite something! Sure was loud and hot up there though!!

 

 

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Ozmac on Saturday, November 21, 2015 10:20 PM

Thanks Heepey, that's a great way to make full use of the kit. Nice idea for the diorama, too. I'm just starting on the Norseman this weekend ...

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Montana USA
Posted by heepey on Saturday, November 21, 2015 9:27 PM

A little motivation for your Norseman build. This little diorama is one that was used in SW Alaska in the mid 1950s. Changing from floats to skis. The old Matchbox kit includes floats, skis, and wheels.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 8:48 AM

Ozmac

I do like the way this thread, about a sloooowwwww old radial-engined biplane with a stall speed effectively close to zero, has mostly been about jet engines.

I think it just goes to show that civilian aircraft is the hidden treasure trove of aviation modelling.

 

Amen!  Many of the great aeronautical advances appeared first on civil aircraft. 

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Ozmac on Tuesday, November 17, 2015 1:33 AM

I do like the way this thread, about a sloooowwwww old radial-engined biplane with a stall speed effectively close to zero, has mostly been about jet engines.

I think it just goes to show that civilian aircraft is the hidden treasure trove of aviation modelling.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Monday, November 16, 2015 9:08 AM

seasick

I don't like to split hairs but did it use a jet engine or a turbofan?

 

Personally, I consider both turbojets and turbofans to be jet engines.  I think where the hair splitting occurs is with an unducted turbofan.  What is the difference really between a turboprop and an unducted fan?  Fortunately, the unducted fan seems to have been a flop, so we may not have to worry about it much longer, but I keep hearing that it will be resurrected soon :-(

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Poland
Posted by Pawel on Monday, November 16, 2015 12:34 AM

Hello!

It's this engine:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivchenko_AI-25

The article says it's a  twin-shaft medium bypass turbofan.

Have a nice day

Paweł

All comments and critique welcomed. Thanks for your honest opinions!

www.vietnam.net.pl

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Sunday, November 15, 2015 11:32 PM

I don't like to split hairs but did it use a jet engine or a turbofan?

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    June 2003
  • From: Cavite, Philippines
Posted by allan on Sunday, November 15, 2015 8:57 PM

Very nicely done!

No bucks, no Buck Rogers

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Ozmac on Sunday, November 15, 2015 2:18 PM

Hey Pawel, thanks for that great info on the various jet versions. Really informative. To complete the full picture of this oddball jet biplane, here's the photo that Wikipedia has with its article on the Belphegor M15.

 

Oh (and back to the original posting) ... thanks to you and Mississippivol for the kind comments on the An-2 build! I'm enjoying looking at the big An-2 on the shelf alongside my smaller, orange-coloured DHC Beaver and Auster AOP Arctic/Antarctic planes. Next up is an orange Noorduyn Norseman with skis ...

 

 

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: State of Mississippi. State motto: Virtute et armis (By valor and arms)
Posted by mississippivol on Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:39 PM
Cool build, Oz!
  • Member since
    May 2009
  • From: Poland
Posted by Pawel on Sunday, November 15, 2015 1:25 PM

Hello!

The Antonov An-2 sure is something special - and it's also special for me, three times I jumped from it with a parachute. It's a "soulmate" to the Douglas DC-3 - using an engine that is a copy of an American design - taken from the Lisunov Li-2 (Russian copy of the DC-3).

The grat majority of those babies were built in Mielec, Poland. The Mielec Plant was also scheduled to build the M-15, they also did a lot of research for that type. They converted one An-2 to LaLa-1 (Latające Laboratorium - Flying Laboratory) - and that was a freak. Front and wings of the An-2, and a jet engine in the rear - just take a look at this:

LaLa-1

LaLa-1

LaLa-1

One reason the Soviets wanted a jet engined agricultural plane was that they could operate it on the same fuel that the tractors used, available on every state-owned farm, whereas high octane gasoline was hard to come by. Ultimately the aircraft proved to be too dangerous to fly - the engine took too much time to respond to throttle increase to allow avoiding obstacles like power lines or so.

Your model of the An-2 is looking good - thanks for sharing and have a nice day

Paweł

All comments and critique welcomed. Thanks for your honest opinions!

www.vietnam.net.pl

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Ozmac on Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:18 PM

Fair point, Don, but as it was intended as the agriculture industry's replacement for an aircraft which they made more than 18,000 of, I suspect it could hardly be labelled a success. And it's still ugly, no matter how many they made.

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, November 15, 2015 12:01 PM

Hey, for an airplane a production run of 175 isn't bad, unless there is a war on.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    August 2014
Posted by Ozmac on Saturday, November 14, 2015 10:37 PM

Just looked up the Belphegor on Wikipedia, and that's one seriously ugly, stupid plane. No wonder they produced just 175 of them and then gave up.

 

  • Member since
    January 2014
Posted by Peter Hollis on Saturday, November 14, 2015 8:44 PM

That would be the PZL M-15 Belphegor - manufactured in Poland and only ever used in Russia.  It was certainly an odd looking plane and according to Wikipedia, 'the world's only jet agricultural plane, the world's only jet biplane and the world's slowest jet'.

Peter

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Central USA
Posted by qmiester on Saturday, November 14, 2015 9:25 AM

I've seen a couple of pics in the past of a Russian jet powered biplane which was apparently built as an aerial application aircraft.  Unfortunately I can't remember the manufacturers name or the A/C model number.

Quincy
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Saturday, November 14, 2015 8:59 AM

tempestjohnny
Very nice build of the lumbering beasty. Always thought they were cool. The biplane in the jet era
 

 

Didn't Antonov even build a jet biplane?

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Naples, FL
Posted by tempestjohnny on Saturday, November 14, 2015 5:35 AM
Very nice build of the lumbering beasty. Always thought they were cool. The biplane in the jet era

 

  • Member since
    August 2014
Antonov An-2
Posted by Ozmac on Saturday, November 14, 2015 12:44 AM

The third plane in my four-plane "Polar Fleet" is finally finished. It's the Antonov An-2, an enormous single-engined biplane, built in 1/72 scale in a kit by Italeri. Though the An-2 isn't as well-known as lots of other planes, it is actually the most-built aircraft of the post WWII period, with more than 18,000 of them built between 1947 and 2001. A real workhorse, the Antonov was produced in many guises, including this one fitted with skis for work in the Arctic. A great "slow-flier" its stall speed is said to be the slowest there is, which is remarkable for a big lump of a plane that can carry 14 people.

 

 

The kit by Italeri wasn't an easy build at all, and for me, with just two years' experience in model-building, it came with a lot of little problems to solve during the build.

 

 

 

I'm using the same orange colour (Tamiya rattle can orange) for all my Arctic/Antarctic planes, for uniformity on the shelf.

 

 

 

The clear canopy came in five pieces (one large and 4 small and a bit ill-fitting). Generally, the kit went together quite well, but for my still limited skills it was probably the most challenging kit I have tackled so far. It's just so hard to know which parts of the build to do, including painting, in what order!

 

 

 

For size comparison, here's the Antonov with another of my Polar 'Fleet', a de Havilland DHC Beaver in Australian Antarctic livery. 

 

The final plane in the Polar fleet is going to be a Noorduyn Norseman (the 1/72 kit by Matchbox). However, in the meantime I have a diorama in mind for the Antonov, which features a WWII Horch snow van and some modded 1/72 figures.

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.