Hi,
I know that I'm no where near as good a model builder as many on this site, so maybe my perspective is different from some, but ever since I've gotten back into model building a few years ago I've tended to look at most kits kind of as a "starting point" more than anything else.
Some kits I have are quite detailed and may not require much anything extra, other than paint and a few minor details, while others I have bought solely as an initial "form" to which I hope to add all sorts of scratch built or store bought details, and maybe even do a little kitbashing or heavy mods to them.
As such to me, as long as you have a good idea of what you are likely "getting before you buy" I'm pretty muchly happy with all the models that I have bought, regardless of manufacturer.
Specifically, I knew that my old Ark Models Potemkin was going to be rough, but I planned on scrathbuiling/doing alot of woirk to it anyway, and it was at the time one of the few Pre-Dreadnoughts on the market, so I was happy when I bought it and happy with it when building, even if some parts were warped or kind of in rough shape.
Similarly I new that the old Lindberg reboxes of the Q-Ship and USS Shangri-la are fairly toylike, but I wanted them a s a basis for making a WWI era freighter and a what-if Essex replacement, and they served that purpose really well.
And finally, I knew that my Amodel Yak-130 and my Be-4 seaplane kit from some other small manufacturer were going to "be representative" of what you might expect from small scale manufacturers, so I wasn't expecting a high end kit, but I was very happy to be able to buy anything that represented the Yak & Be that I could use as a starting point for a build
Anyway, just some additional thoughts that I wanted to add
Pat