SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Galactica

5721 views
55 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, February 6, 2004 10:12 AM
Hello,

I was walking last night on a local supermarket in
Mexico, when all of a sudden I saw a strange
model on the Toy area.

I usally go by this area while going for gorceries,
I saw a model of Viper Colonial from Revell Monogram,
Skill Level 2. There was only one,,,it was not there the
week before, and I asked if there were more, but no,,,
they say that that was the only one hidden at their warehouse
and because they had to sell everyghing, they just put it out
for sale, just like that...

I am contemporary of Galactica Series but never been
a Fan of it, I like Sci Fi stuff , but more like UFO´s and
things like that.

Well, what I did is I purchased this kit "Viper Colonial"
(Revell Monogram tm), because I imagined that it may
have a good value on the market. The box is closed
very good conditions, its from 1997, Imported from Germany
by our Local Model Factory "Lodela".

* Long: 27.9 Cm.
* # of parts: 19 .
* Plastic Color: Clear Gray / Light .
* Decales : Water Transffer.

What I can do is exchange it for other model,
or sell it . I have not decided yet what to do,
but I am open to any deal.


  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, February 1, 2004 2:01 AM
WHOO HOOO

A new BattleStar Galactica Series !!!!!!

Yep , I was just on the Bay looking to see what I might find and prices are still pretty high for the Viper , We can hope they re- release it but then who knows with Revel ???? I tried getting one and had 20 minutes left , and it was at $38 at the time , before the 20 minutes were up the model sold for $110 , so like everyone else says , patience and keep looking .
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 11:26 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TMONEY

DOES ANYBODY KNOW A ADHIESIVE THAT WORKS WELL WITH A CAST FIBERGLASS RESIN PART TO SHEET STYRENE . ALSO SHEET STYRENE TO A PART CAST FROM LIQUID PLASTIC


Tom,
I have never tried to cement these materials together before but I suspect that super glue would work for nearly any bonding job. If super glue doesn't dry fast enough to do the job, try some super glue accelerator, or "kicker". It forces the super glue to cure instantly. Cool [8D]

I'd also suggest that you'd get more responses to your question if it was posted as its own thread in either the Tips and Techniques forum or the General Modeling forum. The question will probably only get a few readers in the 'Galactica' thread. JMO Smile [:)]

-Mark
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, January 10, 2004 10:40 AM
DOES ANYBODY KNOW A ADHIESIVE THAT WORKS WELL WITH A CAST FIBERGLASS RESIN PART TO SHEET STYRENE . ALSO SHEET STYRENE TO A PART CAST FROM LIQUID PLASTIC
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Central MI
Posted by therriman on Friday, January 9, 2004 8:28 AM
CTFW420 and Tmoney, Welcome to the forums.Sign - Welcome [#welcome]Sign - Welcome [#welcome]
Tim H. "If your alone and you meet a Zero, run like hell. Your outnumbered" Capt Joe Foss, Guadalcanal 1942 Real Trucks have 18 wheels. Anything less is just a Toy! I am in shape. Hey, Round is a shape! Reality is a concept not yet proven.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, January 8, 2004 7:14 PM
MESSAGE FROM TMONEY ANY OTHER CAPECODERS OUT THERE
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, January 7, 2004 3:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by mark956

Sign - Welcome [#welcome] to the FSM forums CTFW420. Thanks for sharing the information with us.
mark956

Thanks alot Mark, I appreciate the welcome.Big Smile [:D]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 6, 2004 9:29 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by TMONEY

THIS FROM A BRAND KNEW SUBS WHAT DOES EVERYONE THINK OF THE SEVERE STREAMLING OF THE CRAFT


I presume you mean the Cylon ships. I think they are quite evolutionary and nicely done. They fit in very well with current trends in 21st century sci-fi imagery. Nothing terribly new but well executed.

BTW, welcome to the forum TMONEY.

-Mark
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 6, 2004 8:07 PM
THIS FROM A BRAND KNEW SUBS WHAT DOES EVERYONE THINK OF THE SEVERE STREAMLING OF THE CRAFT
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by mark956 on Tuesday, January 6, 2004 4:26 PM
Sign - Welcome [#welcome] to the FSM forums CTFW420. Thanks for sharing the information with us.
mark956
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, January 6, 2004 7:55 AM
after reading all of the posts, I decided to go to the Sci-Fi Channels website (since I'm a huge fan of the original and truly liked the new 2-part movie) and they do have news on there that they are in negotiations to go ahead with a 2 year deal on a mini-series for the new Galactica. You can find the article on the Sci-Fi Channels home page. I personally think this would be great and not being a network person for them think it would be a big possibility seeing as though it was the largest rated and watched Sci-Fi event they've ever had on the channel.
  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by SNOOPY on Monday, December 22, 2003 4:39 PM
Diggeraone: I have to agree some what with what you said. As far as classifiing Sci-Fi writing in the last twenty years to be bad. Well, I would not go that far. I think Dune was done very good. Might even be better than the first one. As far as St:NG, it started out being not that great but by the late second to third season it was very good. I also liked DS9, before the story line became so that there was a war between everyone. The first Galatica, written by Glen Larson was designed for a TV audience and to be a series. I might be wrong with this but I think he also wrote Buck Rogers which at first was a little corny but it got better towards the end of the series. IMO, SCI-FI movie/TV will always seem corny to someone who expects SCI-FI to be physically real and probable. It won't be. If you look at it as if this could possibly happen then you are watching for the wrong reason. Fiction will be fiction. With Sci-fi, their is that hint of Science where parts may be possible. You are always going to find inaccuracies in everything.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, December 22, 2003 12:33 PM
what?
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Ozarks of Arkansas
Posted by diggeraone on Monday, December 22, 2003 12:13 PM
to all those who read this,battlestar was pretty good from the one part i saw.tho i think that sci-fi writers now adays are getting lame.like take a look at all the sic-fi in the last twenty years and see how bad it is getting.1-star trek the next gen.was lame from begining to end.the worst being the movies esspcially frist contact.some one did not do there research,a.zefferan cockren was born on alpha centorey,b.the romulan wars happen before warp drive.then you have termanator which is a remake in a way of coll-suiss/golliath exp[movie-the corbin experiment].allein an armangedon i can truly say is the last two origanil ideals that were done,even tho alliens was a crock .to know way you need to read the book allein,which was a self-sufficient bio weapon[no queen].now i think that new galactia is better due to the relisizm that comes with it.the old was made children and prime time tv in those days,not very much grown up ha.say what you will the new one is better than the old.
Put all your trust in the Lord,do not put confidence in man.PSALM 118:8 We are in the buisness to do the impossible..G.S.Patton
  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by SNOOPY on Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:42 AM
I think it is funny that it was called a mini-series. When I was growing up mini-series was a week long series with each night being 2 hours long. Example, Shogun. Now that was a miniseries. I am not sure how they could extent Galactica to that point withouot making it a series. We will just have to wait.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:23 AM
I'm sorry to say that Battlestar Galactica is only a two-part miniseries. I suppose, technically, you could say that part three would be the ongoing series, but we'll be waiting a while for that. I haven't even heard when it will air (or 'if').
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: USA
Posted by mark956 on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 10:25 PM
Has any one heard when part 3 will be on. They kinda left me hanging.
mark956
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posted by maddafinga on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:18 PM
It was pretty good until they went into space actually. I loved that Steve Buscemi went to the mafia and got a huge loan right before they left, operating on the assumption that he'd not make it back. The condition that they never pay taxes again was funny as well.
Madda Trifles make perfection, but perfection is no trifle. -- Leonardo Da Vinci Tact is for those who lack the wit for sarcasm.--maddafinga
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 1:24 PM
sad to say as much as I think armageddon is horrible in terms of plot, dialog, acting, etc.... I'll still watch it when it's on TV, complaining the whole way about how bad new Sci-Fi movies are...
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:57 PM
What was wrong with Armageddon? Wink [;)]Tongue [:P]

Seriously, though, at the risk of losing my credibility, I still like Armageddon, too. I just look at it in a comedic light and it works very well!

I think the new B.G. could be the best (and maybe only) serious sci-fi since Babylon 5. And I don't mean hard science fiction, I mean serious as in tackling real world issues in a thoughtful way. Smile [:)]

-Mark
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:35 AM
I just hope it doesn't turn into Starship Troopers or Armageddon. Too many Sci-Fi movies/shows are cheesy and so much less than they could be. Sci-fi can me non-geek and take itself seriously as long as the characters behave like real people.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 11:07 AM
I'd have to say that I absolutely love the new show! 9.5 out of 10 for me!!! There are so many reasons to love it! Here are only a few:

I love the epic feel to it that the original show never developed. The new writers have "dilated" the timeline and have given the destruction of the colonies the sad sort of respect it deserves. This is a huge, devastating event that the original show glossed over. Now, we have the time to see more of what happened and to understand just how small the fleet is compared to the vast expanses of the universe. Watch the shot in which the Galactica "jumps" into the Ragnar system, silhouetted against the HUGE nebula, and you'll see what I mean.

The new show feels much more "human" than the original. It is permeated with a sense of desperation, from the actions of the new President and Adama's reluctant acceptance of them, to Baltar's futile attempts to deny his role in the destruction of his species. As Colonel Ty said, "No one is a rookie anymore." No one is innocent, and everyone is deeply touched by the Cylon attack.

I think it is intriguing that neither race has energy weapons. The possibility of running out of ammo opens up a whole range of plot twists and changes. Plus, the extensive use of missiles by both sides seriously ramps up the tension. Who ever thought that the Cylons in the original show could have fatally damaged the Galactica with anything short of a kamikaze attack? Not I! But nukes... now we're talking serious danger.

The Cylons in their new forms are absolutely terrifying! They are infinitely more dangerous than before. They are faster, sleeker, smarter, and they have the perfect camoflage. Over the course of 40 years (show time) doesn't it make sense that the Cylons would evolve? Besides, the blonde Cylon said that the "tin can" Cylons still exist and that they serve their purpose. I don't doubt that we'll see them again. The new fighters are very sexy and the new Base Stars are the most horrifying thing in science fiction TV since the Vorlon Planet Killer. I'm very happy with their design. At least they don't still look like a few hub-caps stuck together!

Now, don't get me wrong; I still love the original Battlestar. And I love the new one, too. I'm sure that both shows can peacefully co-exist. The new show has so much potential! I sincerely hope that it finds widespread acceptance and becomes the long-running series that it could. A cold vacuum exists in TV science fiction today. Think about it! What are you going to watch? Star Trek: Enterprise? Please!!!

I'll be faithful to the new show until it falls into the "alien-planet-of-the-week" trap like the original series did.

Mark
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, December 17, 2003 8:13 AM
The original Galactica series used the valley forge miniature for the agro-ships. The new series just picked up on that. Back in those days miniatures were used again and again. After the making of 2001, Kubrick had all the miniatures and plans destroyed so they wouldn't have the same fate. Just watching the Twilight Zone you'll see the ship and uniforms from Forbidden Planet over and over again.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Posted by maddafinga on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 8:32 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by paulnchamp

It sure looked like they snuck in the "Valley Forge" from Silent Running in there.


Good movie there. I've always been a Bruce Dern fan.
Madda Trifles make perfection, but perfection is no trifle. -- Leonardo Da Vinci Tact is for those who lack the wit for sarcasm.--maddafinga
  • Member since
    December 2002
Posted by SNOOPY on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 6:06 PM
The mini-series was okay in my opinion. It went along with the old "BATTLESTAR GALATICA" for a good part of it except in the original Cylons were not made from the humans they actual were a different race that created androids to continue their existance (remeber the Imerperious Leader). I actualy still have the action figures of the first series. I did not like how it ended. It left it wide open for a series and it will be just like the other one where they find Earth and the Cylons just dissappear. In Galatica 1980 (Ithink that was the name of the last series when they found Earth) did anyone think that if the Cylons found Earth how would Earth defend against the Cylons when their technology was really inferior to the humans on the Galactica? I often wondered if the Cylons would really pervail. How about those flying motorcycle bikes with turbo engines? Cool huh.

I give then new mini-series a 6 out of 10. The Cylon Baseships looked like Vorlon technology from Babylon 5.

Remember, this is just my opinion.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Warwick, RI
Posted by paulnchamp on Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:52 PM
It sure looked like they snuck in the "Valley Forge" from Silent Running in there.
Paul "A man's GOT to know his limitations."
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Racing capital of the world- Indy
Posted by kaleu on Tuesday, December 9, 2003 3:33 PM
I did like most of what I watched last night. The effects were better and it was missing some of the cheesy acting from the first series. Hower, I did miss the sound of the fighters/ships moving in space. I know it's not realistic, but I didn't like "mute" feeling during the space battles. I like the new Vipers and Cylon fighters, but not the Cylon basestars. I was hoping something more along the lines of the original series. If this gets picked up, I hope they bring back the original Cylon soldiers. I will be watching the second part tonight.

As for Star Trek, I liked TNG and DS9. I have mixed feelings about Voyager and haven't seen enough of Enterprise to decide if I like it or not.
Erik "Don't fruit the beer." Newest model buys: More than I care to think about. It's time for a support group.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 9, 2003 3:00 PM
I look at it as the new show is not "Battlestar Galactica" but a new show with a similar plot. If I was to compare I like the old one better but still like the new one. I wish they would have done something like the old one did in terms of the earth/colonies parallels, ie egyptian influences in dress/architecture and so on.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 9, 2003 12:32 PM
Y'know, for a Sci-Fi Channel mini-series, it t'wernt too bad. I loved the way the cameras reacted to the external (in space) scenes, looked like the cameraman was caught by surprise and had to focus on whatever caught his attention. Hate the new vipers. Glad that they kept the old ones. The Galcatica kinda looks like it's awaiting drywall but they did keep the overall shape of the original. Personally, I like the new Cylon ships, I never understood why the originals needed three crew members anyway. An unmanned droid ship makes more sense. The ship movement and the use of thrusters is a huge improvement over the original series. 8 outta 10 IMHO.

I can't believe they made Starbuck a chick.[:0]

-but the cylons are way hotter!Big Smile [:D]Evil [}:)]Tongue [:P]

-fish
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.