SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

H2O Jet in 1/144 WWII Cruiser? Suggestion?

960 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, November 13, 2003 10:39 PM
Not that good.
If you have trouble in installing prop shafts and all the associated bits why not purchase a complete outfit ie motor, gear box , shaft and tube complete with stuffing boxes. Some even come with prop. Yoy can adjust the size/pitch of the screw to get the best speed/battery life.
That is the way I started.
Dai
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: PDX, OR
Posted by Umi_Ryuzuki on Thursday, November 13, 2003 12:50 AM
My first consideration would be that,
I do not recall there being a reverse on those jet ski.

If you don't care about scale then I would consider looking for a
"Z-drive" from graupner or robbe. it is like a small trolling motor
designed for r/c tugs.

If you have a look at this LST build up, you will see how we typically run
propeller shafts.
http://groups.msn.com/ModelersAndHobbyForum/japaneset103lstbuildup.msnw?Page=2

I see a lot of people have difficulty with propeller shafts, stuffing tubes, and hull mounting and sealing. I may have to do a quick tutorial on this.
I will have to get some good image of a typical shaft installation the next time we place some.

1/144 should have little difficulty running off one or two shafts. The stuffing tubes can be made up of KS brass rod and tubing.
Just start with at 1/8 inch rod, and get the next three sizes of tubing that fit over the rod and each other.

A short 5/32nd inch piece of the smallest diameter tube, will be the bearing. A 1/4" piece of the next size larger, the bushing, . The Stuffing tube being the largest is cut to a length to allow the tube to reach from the propeller thru the hull, and then to a height to meet the motor shaft. The bearing and bushing are soldered one inside the other, and then both are soldered into the end of the stuffing tube. One set for each end.

I then cut a long hole in the bottom of the hull to get the stuffing tube at the correct angle. I tape an block the ends into place, then I put tape along side, and over the stuffing tube so that the tape conforms to the outside of the hull. Once the tape completely seals the hole around the stuffing tube, I pour five minute epoxy into the space around the stuffing tube on the inside of the hull and let it harden.

When the tape is removed from the hull, the epoxy will have cured conforming to the hull bottom. Then just a little sanding is required to clean up the edges. Once the hull is painted no one will see how big a hole you cut to put the shaft through.

edit:
Once the shafts are in place, you can try an unlimited number of motor, battery, and propeller configurations for speed and running time.

We typically run 12- 14 volt Pittman motors. Our running times for our 1/72nd scale ships on a 12 volt 3 ahr battery are about one to two hours of continuous running. On a typical sailing day, where you are chatting, and running the ship intermitently, we never need more than one batteries for the day.

Aimee

Nyow / =^o^= Other Models and Miniatures http://mysite.verizon.net/res1tf1s/
  • Member since
    November 2005
H2O Jet in 1/144 WWII Cruiser? Suggestion?
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 12, 2003 11:40 PM
Hi,
Currently working on the USS Houston in 1/144 for RC. I've always had trouble in the past with the drive systems in RC boats. I'm thinking about losing the screws and running a water jet system taken from an RC jet ski. Besides it's not being "historically accurate" is this an idea that would have any functional drawbacks?
I see it as a keen way to avoid alot of hull cutting and drilling, also there would be no props to get tangled in the water weeds. ( I know they could just as well get into the impeller) I know little about the pros and cons of the system otherwise.. I'm looking for capabilities at or above scale speed and a "good" battery life ( I know that's subjective)
I know others must have attempted this scheme before.. Anyone? What were the results?
Any info would be greatly appreciated.
--jeff
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.