SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Revell 1/350 Bismarck

26553 views
45 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Revell 1/350 Bismarck
Posted by firesmacker on Saturday, August 30, 2008 4:36 PM

Well, I finally took the plunge and ordered this kit from internethobbies.

I promised the wife that if I bought something this large and expensive that I would see it through to completion. 96 bucks with shipping ain't so bad but, since we just bought a house, well...yeah.

I heard nothing but rave reviews. When everyone says a Revell kit is the best on the market, that really tells me a lot. What do you guys think about using PE on this kit? Is it really neccessary? I've only done it on 1/48 AC before and don't want to get bogged down with trying to do all the rails and whatnot. Like a lot of folks, when I start going crazy with A/M products, my builds tend to never get finished. 

From looking at the sprue pics online, there are life rails on some sections but not others. The most glaring ommision is the entire length of the main deck. Do you guys think this will matter. I'm never going to enter it in any sort of competition. It will be purely for my own enjoyment. And of course I will post pics over here. 

Did I just answer my own question? 

Any opinions would be appreciated.

Regards,

Jeff 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Saturday, August 30, 2008 7:01 PM
PE is indeed a steep an slippery slope, from which there is no turning!  That said, PE rails along the main deck are a very good touch.......
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Saturday, August 30, 2008 7:29 PM

Thanks for the reply Searat. Can you tell me just how much of a chore they are to do in your opinion? I may order the set just to do the rails. It just seems like to much to leave out. I'm not really concerned about radars, aa, etc.

Regards, 

Jeff 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Monday, September 1, 2008 10:34 AM

I have the same kit, and I agree with Searat12.  Although the kit provides railings, they are somewhat oversize.  PE railings might be equally thin but tend to look better. Also, PE makes much more realistic-looking radars, cranes, AA guns, etc.  Yes, PE is a pain, but it is worth the effort.

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Monday, September 1, 2008 4:04 PM

Thanks Bill,

One concern I have is that every set I find says it's for the Tamiya kit. Is there that much of a difference? I don't want to have to start making bunch of modifications just to use PE meant for a different kit. I found a set at Tom's Model Works but it just says 1/350 Bismarck and unfortunatley the search engine on that site is pretty much useless So it's a little hard to nail down just what kit it is for. One size fits all maybe?

It makes Squadron look state of the art. (Not a knock on their service or products, they are great. The search function? Not so much...)

As I stated in my original post, I don't want to devote years to this project. Naturally I want it to look good but, I would also like to wrap it up in around 6 months.

Regards,

Jeff 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Monday, September 1, 2008 4:29 PM

Jeff,

If you are not concerned with the radars, cranes, AA, and other small details, I would go for a build out of the box.  The kit is certainly well-detailed enough for a great model of the Bismarck.  I'm not too bothered by the slightly overscale railings because they are at least three-dimensional.  PE railings can be much too thin at the 1/350 scale.  I personally prefer PE for the other fine details I already mentioned.  But, you can get a fine build out of this particular box!

Happy modelling!

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Monday, September 1, 2008 5:01 PM

And this gentlemen is why I love this forum.

Thanks Bill. The kit comes tomorrow. I'll clean the parts and take a good look at them so I can fix in my mind how I want to tackle this. I will most likely spend the rest of the week masking. I'll post pics as I make progress.  

Regards,

Jeff 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Monday, September 1, 2008 5:39 PM

My pleasure!  Enjoy the build!  I look forward to the pics!

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 7:01 AM

here are some reviews I had bookmarked when the annoucement came out; available PEs from the usual cast of suspects (Eduard, Toms, WEM) are for the Tamiya kit. You could get generic ladders and rail sets in the meantime I guess; I am sure (?) some specific PE will come out for the revell Bismarck at some point unless the PE makers are backlogged making sets for all the new IJN 350 ships being released lately.

http://malaysiascalemodelling.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=38&Itemid=2

http://www.modelwarships.com/reviews/ships/dkm/bismarck/350-revell-peek/rvl-review.html

 

http://www.modelshipwrights.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=3249&mode=thread&order=0

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: VIRGINIA - USA
Posted by Firecaptain on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 5:16 PM

I can't remember where I read it (on so many forums, I loose track) but one of the PE manufacturers listed a specific set for the RofG Bismarck as "TBA", so it should be forthcoming.

I have gotten as far as assembling the hull halves together. I found the the rear-most rounded portion of the deck is about a 1/16 short, so there is a glaring (to me anyway) gap. The rest of the deck is dead nuts on and fits tight, just the rear, and there's no splitting the difference front to back as the deck is held solid in place at the anchor cut-outs in the front and can't be shifted.

Some of the PE companies have generic German ship railings etc and I believe the set for the Tamiya Bismarck will do just fine, nothing that a good pair of PE scissors can't adjust.

Good luck with the build!

Joe
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 6:33 PM

Thanks for the replies everyone. The kit was here when I got home from work today. When I opened it, man oh man, WOW! I think I felt it move "down there" I'm pretty excited...

The kit supplies decals for the hull camo and the waterline. I think I will just mask and paint those instead. Not sure what time frame I'm going for but, I just have to paint the turret tops in the darker color. It just seems to make it "pop" more to me.

It looks like I will just use the supplied parts for the rails and whatnot. This is my first time tackling anything this big. If all goes well, Missouri is next. That one I will use PE on.

Anyway, all parts are washed and are still drying. I'll begin masking the hull tomorrow.

I really want to do this kit justice when I display it. Any ideas or links to companies who make that sort of thing?

Regards,

Jeff

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Tuesday, September 2, 2008 8:18 PM
 Firecaptain wrote:

I can't remember where I read it (on so many forums, I loose track) but one of the PE manufacturers listed a specific set for the RofG Bismarck as "TBA", so it should be forthcoming.

I have gotten as far as assembling the hull halves together. I found the the rear-most rounded portion of the deck is about a 1/16 short, so there is a glaring (to me anyway) gap. The rest of the deck is dead nuts on and fits tight, just the rear, and there's no splitting the difference front to back as the deck is held solid in place at the anchor cut-outs in the front and can't be shifted.

Some of the PE companies have generic German ship railings etc and I believe the set for the Tamiya Bismarck will do just fine, nothing that a good pair of PE scissors can't adjust.

Good luck with the build!

1/16" off at the stern??  Sounds to me like some sort of manufacturing flaw... Perhaps Revell will give you a new deck piece??
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: VIRGINIA - USA
Posted by Firecaptain on Wednesday, September 3, 2008 3:14 PM

Yep at the stern. It's almost as if the deck was molded too short at the rear. and I say that because of the way iy fits at the anchor cutouts and the bow and everywhere else fits perfect.

I was thinking of writing Revell and see if I could get another deck, but was hoping someone here had the kit to dry-fit theirs and see what gives.

I posted this on another site and got no response.

 

Thanks 

 

Joe
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Portsmouth, RI
Posted by searat12 on Wednesday, September 3, 2008 5:28 PM
I would very interested to hear if this is an issue with other modellers Revell Bismarck kits.... Anyone out there have the same experience with this kit???
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Wednesday, September 3, 2008 7:39 PM

I'm currently in the process of gluing the hull halves together. I did a test fit and the main deck fits just fine. The only issue I have so far is that a small piece of the bullnose on the starboard half is busted off. It's very tiny so I'm sure I can fix it.

One problem I am having is gluing to midships part of the hull together. The bow and stern are fine but getting that long run is giving me fits. I don't see any way of securing it without pulling the upper half of the hull out of whack. I may just get it as close as I can and then pull any gaps with putty or styrene. Any suggestions? I don't have any clamps that are anywhere near big enough. Any tips would be welcome.

Regards,

Jeff

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: VIRGINIA - USA
Posted by Firecaptain on Thursday, September 4, 2008 1:28 PM

I placed the 2 hull halves firmly on some wax paper on the fitchen counter and used medium super glue and accelerator and kid of tacked it as I went along being sure to keep the flat bottom of the hull firmly on the flat counter. My son would squirt the acceleerator as I pushed and held the 2 pieces together with the pressure being firm and linear at the bottom.

Once the small tacks were done I ran a bead down the entire seam. After that dried thouroughly I coated the entire seam and about a 1/2" on either side with 5 minute epoxy.

Any gaps on the exterior of the hull seam was filled with the med super glue but with no accelerator.

So you're saying that your deck fits tight and at the rear most edge of the hull with no gap at all, and the front is the same, with no gap?

 

Thanks 

 

Joe
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:35 PM

I just dry-fit mine and it fits fine. I see no gaps anywhere. 

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, September 4, 2008 2:49 PM

I've read the discusson of the hull/ deck fit of the RoG 1/350 Bismarck with increasing concern. I've therefore just taped the hull and the deck together - and experinced no fit problems whatsoever! (phew!)

I started by taping the two hull halves together from the waist, and then worked outwards towards the stem and stern.  There's a centreline seam which will need cleaning up, but no more than any other 2-part hull kit I've ever built, and far better than most. I think I'll reinforce the seam from the inside with pieces of scrap plastic card, and I'll be using gap-filling CA for the join, tacked and then flooded, but I don't envisage any problems.

The deck fitted perfectly too. Again I started from the waist and worked outwards. Maybe there's the tiniest gap right at the bow, but nothing that a spot of Tippex won't cure. To add strength to the hull, I might install some sprue spacers just below weather deck level, but that'll be about it.

I've taken some piccies of all this, which I'll post presently.

As far as the etch is concerned, I talked to John at WEM about this earlier in the year. He said he wasn't planning to do a set specially for the RoG kit. He felt that it was (much) better detailed than the Tamiya kit, and that their etched set for the Tamiya kit would provide all that was needed. I'm planning on starting my Bismarck early next year, and I'm alomst certain that I'll be using the WEM etch, though, if I order it directly from GMM, their etch is barely half the price, but nowhere near as finely-etched as the WEM set.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Thursday, September 4, 2008 4:59 PM
 Firecaptain wrote:

I placed the 2 hull halves firmly on some wax paper on the fitchen counter and used medium super glue and accelerator and kid of tacked it as I went along being sure to keep the flat bottom of the hull firmly on the flat counter. My son would squirt the acceleerator as I pushed and held the 2 pieces together with the pressure being firm and linear at the bottom.

Once the small tacks were done I ran a bead down the entire seam. After that dried thouroughly I coated the entire seam and about a 1/2" on either side with 5 minute epoxy.

Any gaps on the exterior of the hull seam was filled with the med super glue but with no accelerator.

So you're saying that your deck fits tight and at the rear most edge of the hull with no gap at all, and the front is the same, with no gap?

 

Thanks 

 

Joe,

Yes, the main deck fit into the hull so tightly, I had to take care when prying it out again. Sounds like your kit is an abberation. I would contact Revell or the company you bought it from.

Jeff

 

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: VIRGINIA - USA
Posted by Firecaptain on Thursday, September 4, 2008 7:18 PM

Hey guys, thanks for checking that for me, I'm calling Revell tomorrow.

 

 

Joe
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Friday, September 5, 2008 12:01 AM

Here are the piccies of my Bismarck's hull and weather deck taped together:

First, the whole hull from below:

Next, the weather deck from above:

now the bow from below (not the best piccy I've ever taken):

and the stern:

Finally, the weather deck, right fo'rrad:

and the stern:

As you can see, no significant fit issues at all, especially when you bear in mind that the parts are only taped, not glued, together.

Oh, and use etch for at least the railings, ladders and radars. I've yet to see these convincingly represented in injection plastic in scales smaller than 1/144.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, September 5, 2008 1:07 AM
 chris hall wrote:

Here are the piccies of my Bismarck's hull and weather deck taped together:

First, the whole hull from below:

Next, the weather deck from above:

now the bow from below (not the best piccy I've ever taken):

and the stern:

Finally, the weather deck, right fo'rrad:

and the stern:

As you can see, no significant fit issues at all, especially when you bear in mind that the parts are only taped, not glued, together.

Oh, and use etch for at least the railings, ladders and radars. I've yet to see these convincingly represented in injection plastic in scales smaller than 1/144.

Cheers,

Chris.

In a previous decade I lived about 100km from the Kiel Canal and railed over it about once a month. Just looking at the hull shape brings back memories. Not all of we americans just got our passports...
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: League City, Texas
Posted by sfcmac on Friday, September 5, 2008 5:39 AM

 Passport? Never heard of one! I was at the German Naval museum at Laboe! Look it up!

 Interesting stuff I have heard this model puts the Tamiya one out to pasture. Nice to see it closer up! Thanks!

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Saturday, September 6, 2008 10:05 AM

Actually, I have been very impressed by the fit overall.  I find this to be an outstanding kit!

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Crystal Lake, IL
Posted by firesmacker on Saturday, September 6, 2008 9:17 PM

Ok guys,

I believe I have the colors for the hull beneath the waterline. It looks like some British Crimson mixed with some Rust will do the trick. (I'm using MM Enamels) I couldn't find any sort of "Hull Red" colors anywhere so I am improvising.

I will go Light Grey for the rest of the hull and the superstructior. I just need a suggestion for the tops of the guns. Dark Grey? Dark Gull Grey?

Anyone who has done this before (or even if you haven't) please feel free to chime in.

Another question, has anyone done a similar kit and used the waterline and/or the camo decals? And if so, how did they look? Should I just skip them and paint them on instead?

Any input would be very much appreciated.

Regards,

Jeff

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, September 7, 2008 2:30 AM

In her relatively short life, the Bismarck appeared in a number of different colour schemes. These are described and discussed here:

http://www.kbismarck.com/drawings.html

here:

http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/paint_schemes/paintbism1940.html

and here:

http://www.smmlonline.com/articles/kriegsmarinecamo/kreigsmarine.html

The latter gives Humbrol and Floquil equivalents for most of the relevant colours. The kit colour instructions are pretty accurate too, but they give the colours in Revell Germany paints (and mixes therof) so may not be too useful on your side of the Pond.

As to Hull Red, Tamiya do a generic one in their acrylic range (XF9), or you can get the exactly correct shade, Schiffsbodenfarbe III Rot 5 in the White Ensign Models Colourcoats range. Notice that if you want the exactly correct colours, they are all available in this range.

http://www.whiteensignmodels.com/

I think the striping decals would best be used to make templates for masks, and the black and white stripes to be sprayed. I'd do this before spraying the light grey main hull colour - much simpler than the other way round. I have concerns about how well the decals would settle down over the superstructure and funnel, and don't really want to have to Future large parts of the model if I can avoid it. OTOH, since the boot-topping is provided as decals, I might use the hull striping.

Cheers,

Chris. 

 

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Sunday, September 7, 2008 8:16 AM

Chris - thanks for the FYI on the PE, good to know that the Tamiya Bis PE will work with the Revell kit. Thanks for the pics too, glad to see fit is not an issue. Great links too! cheers

here is a link with paint chips for Kriegsmarine colors, including Schiffsbodenfarbe III Rot 5 (Underwater Hull Red) and colourcoats order #s

http://www.afrikakorps.org/kriegsmarinecolors.htm

You may be able to replicate this color starting with MM enamel Insignia red and adding increasing amounts of dark brown:

From a WIP, bottom sub is painted MM enamel Insignia Red, top sub MM enamel Insignia red + dark brown. More "brown" will get you closer to Schiff Rot 5.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Sunday, September 7, 2008 8:52 AM

Chris,

Thank you for those links! They are very informative. Now for my pitch . . . I love the WEM Kriegsmarine line of colors.  I can't wait to use them when someone manufactures a 1/350 Prinz Eugen, Admiral Hipper, Scharnhorst, Gneisenau, Blucher, Leipzig, Nurnberg, Emden, Karlschruhe, et al.

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, September 7, 2008 1:44 PM

Revell Germany do, of course, already do a 1/350 Emden, but you'd need WEM's Imperial German Navy range of colours for that. It would be good if Revell Germany were to do kits of the other subjects on your wish-list, Bill, but, sadly, it's more likely to be Trumpeter Pirate [oX)] Evil [}:)]Banged Head [banghead] who would then queer the pitch for anyone else.

Cheers,

Chris. 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Sunday, September 7, 2008 5:56 PM

Chris,

I meant the light cruiser that served in WWII.

Bill Morrison

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.