Billy Mitchell 'proved his point' with
land-based twin engine Army bombers against an
anchored dreadnought that had no defense, and was never designed to deal with air attack in any way. Shooting fish in a barrel would have been easier, yet how long did it take for Mitchells slow bi-plane bombers to finally sink the un-manned, anchored and undefended old German Dreadnought? Exactly! Airplanes able to fly off carrier decks at the time could barely get off the deck, let alone carry a sufficient bomb-load to do anything worthwhile. And the carriers around at the time were
freaks like the 'midlife' HMS Furious, and triple-decked IJN Akagi, and had little or nothing in common with such things as 'Essex', 'Enterprise,' or 'Shokaku.' Yes, airplanes had been around in a sort of 'combat effective' way for about ten years before the first of the treaties, but not 'combat effective' in a
Naval way as anything more than reconnaissance. It is important to remember, that at the time, there was a great dispute as to what would actually constitute the 'aircaft carrier.' A LOT of emphasis, and a LOT of planning and money indicated that the
Zeppelin would be the best platform for an aircraft carrier, and not a ship at all.... It is important to look at these things, not with 20/20 hindsight, but as they were perceived
at the time..... When you do so, you will see that it COULD have gone a LOT of different ways.....