SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Lindberg Graf Zeppelin Carrier

22367 views
43 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2005
Lindberg Graf Zeppelin Carrier
Posted by caramonraistlin on Sunday, September 6, 2009 8:57 AM

Greetings:

Now that the large Japanese subs have finally arrived, has anyone heard anything about the Graf Zeppelin aircraft carrier? After reading the other thread I sure hope they at least get the hull right!

 

Sincerely

 

Michael Lacey

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Sunday, October 4, 2009 4:48 PM
caramonraistlin-Hi_ I don,t know what you are expecting and I wonder does anyone? The GRAF ZEPPELIN carrier was NEVER finished so I believe a lot of what is coming down the pipe is conjecture.This creates a problem, well, actually two. One, what do you compare it to?? and two ,who do you go to to know if ANYTHING is correct. What if it had been planned to mount guns like the BISMARK on it?? Suppose the planes intended for it never got past the design stage? ad-infinitem.I will have to see about this one. The truth is this means I could build a carrier off the TITANIC hull and say the BRITISH govt. was considering this design for a carrier in 1912! So, don,t get your hopes to high on the accuracy of this ship. Suffice it to say,was it based on an existing hull design? Was it a totally new design.? Will we see shades of SCHARNHORST in there?? Lets just wait and when it gets here we will know.     tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    May 2006
Posted by thunder1 on Sunday, October 4, 2009 5:55 PM

Hi T Builder

 I enjoy reading you posts. Over at Wikimedia Commons there are 70+ photos(professional builder pics) of the German carrier under construction, with some excellent close up photos of the ships hull. You are correct, the carrier was never complete or operational but the photos would give the viewer a sense of what the prototype looked like. Compare the German photos of the ship against the proposed model and use ones best judgement as to the models appearence/accuracy(when available at the LHS).

 IMHO, a new model from a manufacturer is always an interesting prospect, especially if it isn't "beaten to death" by having every model company produce it(the Iowa class battleships, fletcher class, PT boats, etc.) BUT is the new model worth your money, based on what the kit's quality is. Only the consumer can answer that.  

  • Member since
    September 2009
There is, of course...
Posted by Randy Stone on Sunday, October 4, 2009 6:35 PM

...a copious amount of primary source material regarding Graf Zeppelin and a suitable kit of it can be manufactured...as has been done already in 1/720th scale.

Whether Lindberg is able to manage such remains to be seen but in my conversations with them I was completely taken aback by several comments which were made regarding their plans wrt Graf Zeppelin.  I have found their choices of late for their larger kits to be superlative; would that the execution be as far reaching.

Randy Stone

  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: VIRGINIA - USA
Posted by Firecaptain on Sunday, October 4, 2009 6:54 PM
If they use the model shown on the back page of LH's sub's instructions, (built by the sub guy) as they did with the subs......... I won't be buying it........
Joe
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Sunday, October 4, 2009 7:24 PM
Poor Lindberg....

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    September 2006
Posted by Fairseas on Sunday, October 4, 2009 9:50 PM
Odd subject at best is all I am going to say. As stated, there is plenty of reference material available so it shouldn't be a hard job for any qualified model company to do it right.

If Lindberg had focused on USN or IJN carriers in that scale & had someone capable doing their design work, I'd have placed my pre-order months ago since I build RC & would have liked having another 1/200 plastic kit of that size to go with the Nichimo builds I've done. Instead, I'll just go the paper model route & scratch build something using a GPM kit.

Now when is Trumpeter releasing that phantom Arizona...
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, October 4, 2009 9:55 PM
 thunder1 wrote:

Hi T Builder

 I enjoy reading you posts. Over at Wikimedia Commons there are 70+ photos(professional builder pics) of the German carrier under construction, with some excellent close up photos of the ships hull. You are correct, the carrier was never complete or operational but the photos would give the viewer a sense of what the prototype looked like. Compare the German photos of the ship against the proposed model and use ones best judgement as to the models appearence/accuracy(when available at the LHS).

 IMHO, a new model from a manufacturer is always an interesting prospect, especially if it isn't "beaten to death" by having every model company produce it(the Iowa class battleships, fletcher class, PT boats, etc.) BUT is the new model worth your money, based on what the kit's quality is. Only the consumer can answer that.  

Ditto, the hull was the same as the Tirpitz and Bismarck, and the a/c were based on the bf109 and stuka...there's plenty of ref material to replicate what the Germans intended...
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Sunday, October 4, 2009 11:53 PM
I don't think there's much room to critisize this model other than hull length. If a modeler wanted to use it as the basis for a "what if" that is open ended .
  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Monday, October 5, 2009 12:48 AM

 Fairseas wrote:
Now when is Trumpeter releasing that phantom Arizona...

YEAH!Dinner [dinner]

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Monday, October 5, 2009 1:57 AM
 bondoman wrote:
I don't think there's much room to critisize this model other than hull length. If a modeler wanted to use it as the basis for a "what if" that is open ended .
True enough.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Bangor, Maine
Posted by alross2 on Monday, October 5, 2009 4:49 PM

Ditto, the hull was the same as the Tirpitz and Bismarck ...
 

From what source did you derive this?  A quick review of Whitley, Breyer, and others indicate that the hulls of BISMARCK and GRAF ZEPPELIN were dimensionally quite different:  250.5m x 36m vs 262.5m x 27m (before blistering) respectively.  BISMARCK had three screws, while GZ had four, which would have impacted hull shape aft and internal arrangments.

Al Ross 

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Monday, October 5, 2009 9:17 PM
Par for the course Al.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, October 5, 2009 9:17 PM
 alross2 wrote:

Ditto, the hull was the same as the Tirpitz and Bismarck ...
 

From what source did you derive this?   

From one of the researchers of the new I-53...

  • Member since
    September 2009
You're...
Posted by Randy Stone on Monday, October 5, 2009 9:51 PM

...dodging the issue you yourself raised.

The question remains: where did you get the data to support your claim that GZ and the Bismarck share the same hull characteristics ?

Randy Stone

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Monday, October 5, 2009 11:35 PM
 (Off topic) The Shinano shared the same hull as the Yamato and Mushashi, correct? Were there any modifications to it?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Graf
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 6:31 AM
 Randy Stone wrote:

...dodging the issue you yourself raised.

The question remains: where did you get the data to support your claim that GZ and the Bismarck share the same hull characteristics ?

Randy Stone

Actually, I shot from the hip on that one from memory...I was mistaken...

Looking back at my refs it does seem that the carrier hulls were different---maybe more along the lines of a cruiser-type. Turns out the Germans actually laid TWO carrier hulls down. The other was broken up early in the war as the Graf languished in the shipyyard...inmterstingly enough, it appears that the Germans also had plans to convert two liners into smaller carriers as the war progressed. Also, the Italians toyed w/ the idea and received unused parts from the Graf, but it also never come to fruition...

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 8:38 AM
 Hi - Manny. I do like where this is going. The fact is, none of my then living relatives ( back in the forties) from GERMANY, Who were in the NAVY knew anything about a large carrier. That doesn,t mean she didn,t exist! I never saw any reference to her until about eight years ago when I was studying a comprehensive ship-designers tome on the history of the AXIS ship design bureaus. They had some amazing things on paper for back then! Considering how many spies everybody had, It,s a wonder that the AXIS didn,t have a few carriers and such back then, even if they were only the size of the BELLEAU WOOD ,they would.ve been a great threat back then!The few photos I,ve seen of her was obscured by a lot of foregroung clutter, so I can only say, the clearest picture I have ,to me she somewhat resembles the ZUIKAKU . Could be wrong, but those two were allies and yet they did spy on each other too! Oh,well,I guess I,ll wait and see.   tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 8:48 AM
 Hi T1 . You are so right. Manny is right though. I happen to have some fact books about developements ongoing on the BF 109 And the STUKA(JU87) as carrier aircraft. There was an article I read sometime back(I don,t remember the mag) That the LUFFTWAFFE did have plans also for the conversion of the FW 190 D or later planes for possible carrier ops.When you consider what was built that influenced all the esoteric war arts? it goes without saying the GERMANS had some forward thinkers. I,ve seen artists conceptions of the vaunted AMERIKA plane. Well, all I can say is thank the powers that be it was NEVER built.The plane if built would,ve swamped all others just in size.  I wonder why we,ve never seen anything like this from the JAPANESE  on various ships . The I boats were, if I have my facts right were based on designs they got from their GERMAN allies. Note::: I said Based on!   tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, October 6, 2009 9:04 AM

 tankerbuilder wrote:
  That doesn,t mean she didn,t exist! I never saw any reference to her until about eight years ago when I was studying a comprehensive ship-designers tome on the history of the AXIS ship design bureaus. The few photos I,ve seen of her was obscured by a lot of foregroung clutter, so I can only say, the clearest picture I have ,to me she somewhat resembles the ZUIKAKU .  tankerbuilder

I actually came across a pic of the hull being launched last night (you know, the champagne bottle and all)---very clear pic and she looked very far along in construction...I'll try to scan and post tonight.

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Friday, October 23, 2009 3:43 PM
While sorting my FSM collection into binders I came across a picture in the September 1993 Reader Gallery of a 1/700 Graf Zeppelin Carrier kit-bashed by a fellow in Baltimore.  He did not cite any sources but said he built it "...with parts from Aoshima's Tirpitz and Testor's Deutschland fitted on Tamiya's Hornet waterline hull.  The German aircraft carrier was launched in 1938 but never entered service."
  • Member since
    November 2003
Posted by Panzercop on Thursday, November 5, 2009 3:55 PM
I believe the Graf Zeppelin's hull is the same class / type as it's heavy cruisers of the Admiral Hipper / Prinz Eugen / Blucher class.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, November 5, 2009 4:43 PM
 Panzercop wrote:
I believe the Graf Zeppelin's hull is the same class / type as it's heavy cruisers of the Admiral Hipper / Prinz Eugen / Blucher class.
Wiki lists the cruisers as 212 m and the Graf at 265 m waterline length.
  • Member since
    April 2005
Posted by ddp59 on Thursday, November 5, 2009 5:54 PM

Graf Zeppelin Dimensions

Size (Max):    23200 t
Length (Total):    262,5 m
Length (Flightdeck):    244,5 m
Beam:    27,0 m
Draft:    7,6 m

Admiral Hipper Dimensions

Size (Max):    18200 t
Length (Total):    205,9 m
Length (Waterline):    
Beam:    21,3 m
Draft:    7,7 m

http://www.german-navy.de/kriegsmarine/ships/index.html

  • Member since
    June 2010
Posted by LMN118 on Sunday, July 18, 2010 7:26 AM

Sorry to dig up a dead and decomposing thread but did anyone actually buy this ship? Or know of a review?

All I can find is the same initial press release, although I have found the ship for sale on three American online retailers and once on Netherlands eBay (via the US).

Quite interested in it, although the price is somewhat off-putting.

  • Member since
    April 2006
Posted by Irish3335 on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:02 AM

Hi all,

lot of conjecture going on here about the GZ as to a lot of what-if's and what-was.  WHO CARES?  It would be awesome if Trumpeter built a 1/350 GZ with a compliment of Stuka's and 109's in carrier configuration.  The secondary market would go nuts with photo etch, and every conceivable aircraft for it (some jet aircraft mabee?).  Be neat to see a 1946 version of it.  Manufacturers have done it with tanks and airplanes, why not a carrier? 

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Jerome, Idaho, U.S.A.
Posted by crackers on Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:05 AM

       Perhaps a picture of the GRAFF ZEPPLIN might be of interest.

   Montani semper liberi !          Happy modeling to all and every one of you.

                     Crackers                   Geeked

Anthony V. Santos

  • Member since
    December 2006
  • From: Jerome, Idaho, U.S.A.
Posted by crackers on Thursday, July 22, 2010 1:25 AM

      Found another of the carrier.

         

   

       Hope these pictures can be of interest and help to those who choose to purchase the carrier kit.

          Montani semper liberi !   Happy modeling to all and every one of you.

                                Crackers                    Geeked

Anthony V. Santos

Uhu
  • Member since
    May 2006
Posted by Uhu on Thursday, July 22, 2010 8:27 AM

One of the eBay sellers who lists the Lindberg kit shows this model in the item description, this is deceptive.   This is NOT a model built from the kit.   This is a scratch built model, I believe built by Willi Fraider.  Do not be fooled.

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, July 22, 2010 10:56 AM

That's curious. I thought that the model was never released. Not to be confused with the rerelease of the hawk airship.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.