SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Best 10 Ship kits of all time...

13483 views
39 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Carmichael, CA
Posted by Carmike on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 1:15 PM

It would seem that we need a set of criteria to go by - something like the Military Channel does with their "Top Tens" except that we can probably leave out "Fear Factor" - unlikely that a kit that is so poorly engineered that you don't want to build it should be in the top ten (I guess that eliminates Aurora's Bonhomme Richard).

My first cut at the criteria would include (most important first):

1. Scale fidelity (the appearance and proportions of the kit should be identical to the real ship)

2. Detail and Completeness (the kit should have be highly detailed and include everything that you need, aftermarket PE should not be needed)

3.  Length of production and availability (for example Revell's 1:96 USS Constitution and 1:570 Queen Mary have been around for a long time and are in the catalog year after year)

4. Innovation (did the kit offer some really innovative features or it was it groundbreaking in some way, for example the Revell 1:192 USS Constitution was highly detailed for its time)

5. Price (how much do you get for your money, a 10 being under $15, 9 under $20, 8 under $25, etc.)

If we try an example, say Revell's 1:84 NYFD Firefighter, using a scale of 1 to 10

1.  Scale Fidelity: 10

2. Detail and Completeness: 10

3. Length of production and availability: 3 (the kit has been around for a long time, but is not in the catalog very often)

4. Innovation: 3, it's a nice kit, a unique model, and originally came with brass plated parts, but nothing earthshaking)

5. Price: 8 (the kit has always been affordable, i.e., under $25)

So that would give the Firefighter a score of 34 out of 50 or about 68%

Anyone want to give another kit a try? 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Tuesday, June 15, 2010 7:40 AM

Good list; we are in the golden age of kits, more so in the ship category. Not only we have good scale conversions (the Tamiya 1/700 Yamato is even better than the 350 scale offering), we have the slide mould Dragon series of WW2 destroyers, the Academy Wasp, the Hobby Boss sub series, etc....

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2009
Posted by Harshman II on Monday, June 14, 2010 2:07 AM

Here is offering aiming for mass market, value for money classic kit.

Tamiya 1/700 USS Enterprise/Hornet

Hasegawa 1/700 IJN Akagi

Trumpeter 1/700 USS Nimitz

Tamiya 1/350 USS Enterprise( CV-65)

Tamiya 1/350 Yamato

Tamiya 1/350 Prince of Wales

Dragon 1/700 USS Essex

Tamiya 1/350 USS Iowa

Revell 1/350 Bismark

Trumpeter 1/350 USS Lexington

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: NJ
Posted by JMart on Monday, October 19, 2009 3:41 PM

I am glad I stand corrected on the sailing ships... I guess my only recollection/experience has been bad old heller kits , the beagle and the pirate ship. I don't have any "young" fond recollections of sailing ship : ( Next time I will finish my coffee before posting ; )

I also forgot the Morgan, that would have made my list... Bill brings one more I would have put done, the Borodino. Also has one of the best box art examples I have seen. I am saving THAT box for sure! The Nagato would have made the list if not for the infamous CAD lines. The details are just exquisite.

Another point to consider is cost, as mentioned before... an honorary mention goes to Dragon 1:700 modern navy Premium kits. Varied quality, but also varied subjects and the kit includes a small PE fret and full hull/waterline options. A great "starter" kit you can find for less than 15$ USD on sale at all major online shops.

This thread could evolve into a great group build theme ; )

 

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Saturday, October 17, 2009 6:13 AM
Thanks
  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Robert on Friday, October 16, 2009 10:43 PM
I've always built it out of the box except for the last time when I substituted Revell blocks as they are a bit smaller than the ones that come with the kit. But this time who knows?  
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Friday, October 16, 2009 7:19 PM

Robert,

Question.  I have the Pyro Blockade Runner/Harriet Lane and have opened the box several times.  Each time I look at the blocks and standing rigging and put the box away again.  I am planning to get aftermarket items from Blue Jacket or a similar place to replace the kit parts.  In your various builds of the kit have you done it out of the box or have you gone aftermarket?  If you have gone aftermarket, where have you gotten your new items?

Thanks!

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, October 16, 2009 7:13 PM
 surfsup wrote:

For me it is the following and not in any order.....

1:- Revell Cutty Sark 1-96

2:-Trumpeter HMS Hood 1-350

3:-Tamiya Bismarck 1-350

4:- Revell Savannah

5:- Airfix HMS Prince

6:- Dragon USS Buchanan 1-350

7:- Trumpeter USS Essex 1-700

8:- Revell S100 1-72

9:- Revell/Matchbox HMS Snowberry 1-72

10:- Revell QM2

They are my favourite Ships at the moment but everyones list will always change with new kits coming out at a fairly rapid rate.

 

This is a very fine list, IMO...
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Friday, October 16, 2009 7:09 PM

thunder1

I'm a '75 graduate of the Academy.  I visited "Base" Boston on a cadet cruise on Eagle in summer '71.  Only spent a weekend.  First Lt on Alert. CO LORSTA Enewetak. Ops at Base Glouster (now Sector Delaware Bay).  OPS on Dallas. Admin Officer at Yorktown.  Deputy at Int Ice Patrol.  Got out as an LT in '86 to settle down and raise 4 kids.  I have a son in the class of '10 at the Academy and another son who is taking the ET2 SWE tomorrow at Sector DelBay.  I joined the Auxiliary a few years ago when my commitment to my kids Scouts and sports activities started to wind down.  Sounds like you had a 30 year career from about '70 through '00 or so with an awful lot of underway time.  E-8, E-9?  Or did you go warrant or mustang?

Semper Paratus!

  • Member since
    May 2006
Posted by thunder1 on Friday, October 16, 2009 2:22 PM

Hello Oceano75

 Yes, I was stationed on the CGC BIBB at the time, I haven't heard Sector Boston referred to as "Base Boston" since the 70's. Spent my entire career in the First District, mostly Mass. and Rhode Island. Pulled a lot of Ocean Stations, Gitmos, Yucatan Patrols, etc. Served on patrol boats, buoy tenders and even the dreaded NANTUCKET Lightship(where careers go to die). If you remember Base Boston, then you must recall the "Combat Zone", the Hobbytown was located in the same area. 

 Spent some time in Allentown, use to visit a shipmate there. What about your CG connection? 

   

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Friday, October 16, 2009 9:00 AM

I agree with thunder1.  It really is in the eye of the boholder.  Many kits mentioned in this thread as "best" are mentioned in the companion thread as "worst".  Sail builders would not include power ships and vice versa.  One person said no sail ship should be in the top 100 and another rattled of a dozen that should be in the top ten.  It's all personal opinion and preference.  You would almost need 2 or 3 compilations: sail, non-sail, and possibly classic.  It is just interesting to see who likes building what and why.

By the way, thunder1.  When were you in the Coast Guard and where?  Sounds like you were at Base Boston at one time. 

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
Posted by thunder1 on Friday, October 16, 2009 8:37 AM
It's all in the eye of the beholder....Nichimo's YAMATO when released in 1970 was a real milestone in ship models. I had just finished up building the Lindberg Fletcher and was looking for a new project. A trip to  the original Hobbytown in Boston had the Yamato on the front counter, heck, it took up the whole counter... I was used to 18" boxes containing diminutive plastic ships and the owner pointed out the HUGE Yamato box to me. He popped the box open and the the size of the hull alone sold me on this kit.  The quality(and quantity) of the parts was state of the art for 1970, even today they hold up pretty well. But the price, a whopping $49.95, it was a monthly car payment! But I had to have it, scratch building wasn't part of my modeling vocabulary in 1970. Being a seaman in the Coast Guard I wasn't able to front the purchase but the owner allowed me to make installment payments. I recall making the final payment and carrying the model back to my ship, all on foot, quite a distance from the hobby shop. I remember the Officer of the Deck remarking at the size of the ship model box "there goes a career man", I guess he was right. Thirty years later I retired and still build ship models.
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Sunny Califorina
Posted by Sherman1111 on Friday, October 16, 2009 7:45 AM

Has any one done a talley yet or you want to run a little longer. I gusss for classics, you could list the Tamiya series of 1/350 Ships. they have stood the test of time. amd another vote for the large REVELL CLIPPERS I saved my money as a paper boy 40 years ago, at least it seams like that to buy The CuttySark. Never finished her but for days i would just  get the box down and look at the rigging drawings when I did get brave enough to start I remember warping masts pulling string to tight, never finished he , but for a 10 year old dreaming of sailing while building was everything. now with video games and tv I am afraid we are looseing our modeling base. I tried to get my son interested, lost to the video games, but i have one more chance with my Granddaughter and grandson,and if I live long enough Great grand children . as soon as they are a little older we will try again. i still find my self maleing an airplane noise as I fly her by me or bang as the tank fires a round,

jd

  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Miami, FL
Posted by Felix C. on Thursday, October 15, 2009 10:21 PM

1/350 Hasegawa Mikasa

1/400 Academy Titanic

1/72 Revell S-100

1/48 Revell Rag Boat

 

  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: brisbane australia
Posted by surfsup on Thursday, October 15, 2009 7:08 PM

For me it is the following and not in any order.....

1:- Revell Cutty Sark 1-96

2:-Trumpeter HMS Hood 1-350

3:-Tamiya Bismarck 1-350

4:- Revell Savannah

5:- Airfix HMS Prince

6:- Dragon USS Buchanan 1-350

7:- Trumpeter USS Essex 1-700

8:- Revell S100 1-72

9:- Revell/Matchbox HMS Snowberry 1-72

10:- Revell QM2

They are my favourite Ships at the moment but everyones list will always change with new kits coming out at a fairly rapid rate.

 

If i was your wife, i'd poison your tea! If Iwas your husband, I would drink it! WINSTON CHURCHILL

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:24 PM
 VELL! HERR MANSTEIN, are ve looking for targets, ya? The 10 best in my humble opinion are as follows One- the swift boat by MONOGRAM. Two -The 36 foot express cruiser(FORMERLY made by LINDBERG) haven,t seen it in years. Three -REVELLS U-47 . Four-The ORIANA/CANBERRA kit by REVELL. Five- The H.M.S.Snowberry-I R.C.d mine and she still runs! Six- The N.S.SAVANNAH-by REVELL. Seven-The BRAZIL by REVELL. Eight-The COAST GUARD CUTTER by LINDBERG. Nine-The Minesweeper by LINDBERG. And Ten - the CHRIS-CRAFT CONSTELLATION by LINDBERG. I choose these because of the opportunity they ALL have given me in the past to develop my scratchbuilding skills. The LINDBERGS are special that way. Revell has also allowed me to stretch the boundaries with these kits. The very first kit bash I EVER did was to a damaged pair of models, the BRAZIL and the SAVANNAH,The SAVANNAH was damaged BEYOND repair aft, The BRAZIL was severely damaged in the forward area.Solution I put the SAVANNAH bow on the BRAZIL where the contours matched almost perfect.Thus my conversion skill door was opened.   tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    July 2009
Posted by Publius on Thursday, October 15, 2009 3:26 AM

     Glad someone got on this idea. I would say that my list goes like this: 1. Pyro Roman Merchant because its so unique. 2. Revell Cutty Sark large because of what it is (fantastic). Is anything wrong with this kit besides the blocks? 3. Revell 1959 HMS Victory because I have one built and rigged with plastic sails now and it looks great and I had one in 1960 when I was 10 years old and won a first in a contest with it. 4. Revell Great Eastern because of the ship that is the subject. 5. Trumpeter's heavy cruiser San Francisco because I suspect it is an accurate modern kit and it's very close to USS Indianapolis, my fathers ship in WW2. He got off just before the loaded the bomb to go to the war college. "44 months in the Pacific." 6. Heller galleons because there aren't enough galleon models, but be careful what you buy. 7. Revell and other ships from Colombus' fleet. Big or small they look good to me and they are contemporary to the first western ships to visit Siam where I live now. What's know about early ships to the East?  8. Aurora USS Hartford because of the propeller and all those cannons on deck. Seems to build into a nice piece even if the kit looks a little thick and crude? 9. Airfix (?) Wasa. Looks super cool of a super cool ship. 10. Revell aircraft carrier Hornet. I got the kit but haven't seen it yet. I think it's a shrine. Model will be OK I'm sure.

     Final note, I'd sure love to see a model of the Atocha, Mel Fishers treasure galleon and anything from the Spanish Armada. Galleons are cool. Phillipines? Big ones with interior detail please. Thanks, Paul

How does this work?

  • Member since
    August 2006
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Robert on Thursday, October 15, 2009 12:42 AM
Of the kits I have built, nearly all sailing ships, I found the best are: Revell CSS Alabama and USS Kearsarge, IMAI Susquehanna -  everything fitted together perfectly -, Revell Mayflower and the greatest of them all, the Pyro Harriet Lane. I'm about to build it (actually a Lindberg reincarnataion) for the 7th time in 44 years.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Wednesday, October 14, 2009 9:25 PM

Further musings...

I like Bondo's Lightship also...  If you can over the flags.  They have to be replaced! 

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Warrington PA
Posted by oceano75 on Wednesday, October 14, 2009 8:20 PM

I'll join in here.

If the main criterion is "kits that exceded expectation", I suggest a modest offering from our good friends at Lindberg.  Their "Coastal Patrol Boat", the Cape-class Coast Guard Cutters, known service-wide as "95s".

The kit, out of the box, is a fairly accurate representation of the A-class boats as they were commissioned in 1953.  I have pictures of ones complete with mousetraps.  The fit is good and the kit goes together well and looks good when done.  The only real change to out of the box would be to file off the molded on hand rail across the front of the superstructure and replace it with Plastruct or Evergreen rod.  With very little work it can be converted to a later C-class boat with a longer pilot house and no ASW weapons.  So, if you are "expecting" a "typical" Lindberg kit, this little one surpasses expectations. 

I built the kit 30 years ago and did a typical early modeler job on it.  I immediately bought 2 kits when Lindberg reissued them.  I have one completed as an out of the box A.  I replaced the handrail with .045 Plastruct rod, replaced the 40 with an HR offering and added HR draped fire hoses.  If I can figure out how to post pictures, I'll post a couple.  The second is in my stash and will be built as a C boat some time in 2010. 

That is my offering.

As for the Revell Conny in 1/96...  I was working on one about 10 years ago.  I thoroughly enjoyed it and would have to include it in my personal top 10.  (FSM included it in their top 10 classic kits)  I had the hull complete and the masts constructed.  I had the fore mast rigged and was about half way through the main rigging.  Then a section of drop ceiling fell on it.  Totally demasted.  I could not believe it when, a week later, I was helping a friend clean out his attic and he came across a 1/96 Revell Conny still in the box.  He mused "how did that get here", looked at me and said "can you use this?".  So now I have another Conny in my stash.  

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, October 14, 2009 2:48 PM

Revell Mayflower, Golden Hind, Morgan.

Hasegawa Mikasa

Zvezda Borodino

Trumpeter USS San Francisco

Revell Campbellton, The Sullivans

Tamiya Bismark

Lindberg Lightship

 

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Windy city, US
Posted by keilau on Tuesday, October 13, 2009 10:17 PM
 jtilley wrote:

The old Revell 1/535-scale U.S.S. Missouri was originally released in 1953.  It was Revell's first ship kit, and one of the very first plastic warships from any firm.  Varney and Lindberg have some claim on the title "First," but the Revell Missouri certainly was a major figure in the first generation of plastic kits.  It featured a level of detail that kit purchasers had never seen before.  (Compare it to the balsa version from Monogram, for instance.)  It captured the imagination of tens of thousands - probably hundreds of thousands - of kids and adult modelers.  It surely was a huge factor in creating the hobby of plastic ship modeling.  If we evaluate "quality" in terms of importance and influence, this kit may well belong among the "top ten."  Certainly the "top hundred."

I remember the visit of Battleship New Jersey to Hong Kong in 1953. It anchored outside of the inner harbor. My father took me on a ferry ship curise that circled around the New Jersey.

I saw the Revell kit shortly after. It took a year or so for the Revell Missouri kit to reach the Hong Kong Hobby Shop. Every week, I made a trip after school to look at the box art in the display window and started saving money for it. It would have taken me forever to save the HK$17.50, but my mother helped with the 90% balance. Compared to all the other Airfix kits I had, it came together relatively easily. It remained the flag ship of my collection until I left Hong Kong for college in 60's. I was proud of the rigging I did, but the brush paint job was no so good. It has to be in the top 10 if rated by impact on modelers.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Tuesday, October 13, 2009 1:50 AM

This is an interesting topic.  It seems to me that if we're going to factor in price, we also should take the age of the kit into consideration.  Depending on whether we do or don't do that, I think I can make an argument for putting the same kit close to the top of both the "Best" and "Worst" lists.

The old Revell 1/535-scale U.S.S. Missouri was originally released in 1953.  It was Revell's first ship kit, and one of the very first plastic warships from any firm.  Varney and Lindberg have some claim on the title "First," but the Revell Missouri certainly was a major figure in the first generation of plastic kits.  It featured a level of detail that kit purchasers had never seen before.  (Compare it to the balsa version from Monogram, for instance.)  It captured the imagination of tens of thousands - probably hundreds of thousands - of kids and adult modelers.  It surely was a huge factor in creating the hobby of plastic ship modeling.  If we evaluate "quality" in terms of importance and influence, this kit may well belong among the "top ten."  Certainly the "top hundred."

But by the standards of 2009 the kit is, regardless of what new-fangled box it's packed in, a real dog.  Its hull is inaccurately shaped (largely because the hull lines of the Iowa class were still classified in 1953).  It has no screws, and it's missing a rudder.  The Oerlikon guns are represented by three-pronged blobs cast integrally with the deck.  The guardrails look like slabs, several feet thick.  The barrels of the Bofors guns are flat on their bottoms.  By modern standards the thing looks more like a toy than a scale model - and it could well be argued that it's one of the worst ship kits ever. 

Matters of deep philosophy aside, I'll take the liberty of disagreeing somewhat with my cyber-friend JMart and suggest several sailing ship kits that I think belong among, or close to, the "top ten":

Heller 1/100 H.M.S. Victory

Heller 1/75 La Reale

Revell 1/96 Constitution

Imai 1/120 Cutty Sark (and probably several other Imai kits; I haven't seen all of them)

Revell 1/64 Viking ship

Revell Mayflower (either scale)

Revell 1/96 Golden Hind

Revell 1/110 Charles W. Morgan

Airfix 1/144 Wasa

Sheesh - that's nine.  I wouldn't want to argue that nine out of the top ten ought to be sailing ships; comparing sailing ship kits with modern steel ship kits really is like comparing apples and oranges.  But those nine, despite the fact that all of them are at least thirty years old, can, in my opinion, hold their own against anything the industry has produced since.

As for the "bottom ten" - taking into due consideration the date factor I mentioned earlier, I nominate the Aurora U.S.S. Halford.  It was labeled a Fletcher-class destroyer (which the real Halford was) equipped with an aircraft catapult (which the real Halford was).  And the picture on the box showed a catapult-equipped Fletcher-class destroyer.  But inside the box was an extremely crude model of either a Sumner- or Gearing-class ship.  (It was so crude that it would be hard to tell which.)  It had a catapult, all right - which none of the Sumners or Gearings did.  And the aircraft on the catapult bore no resemblance to - well, much of anything.  Even by mid-fifties standards, that was a lousy model.

And then, of course, there's the Revell "H.M.S. Beagle," one of the more egregious marketing scams in the history of the hobby business.  And the same company's "S.M.S. Seeadler" and clipper ship "Staghound" - more of the same.  The grossly misproportioned Heller "Oseberg Ship" surely belongs on that list.  Come to think of it, I'd include quite a few of those old Heller kits that used identical hulls dressed up with decorations that turned them into travesties unlike anything that ever floated.

That "bottom ten" list is a pretty depressing subject.  Better go to bed.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Windy city, US
Posted by keilau on Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:53 PM
 keilau wrote:

My vote for one of the best AND the best model for the money goes to the Trumpeter 03612 1:200 scale Sovremenny Class Destroyer Type 956. Not my most favorite modeling subject. But a high quality kit with small PE frets that makes possible a nice display model out of the  box without after market parts. It is one of the few recent (2002/2003) model release that caused a stir in the modeling community. See the multiple parts build report by Guido Hopp for details. I paid $45 for one in 2006. It is still on the Trumpeter online catalogue, but getting more difficult to find in the US. A 2009 release from Bronco of the same ship, same scale is priced over $200.

Free Time Hobby has this 1:200 scale Sovremenny Class Destroyer kit in stock for $91.15. Still an excellent value.

  • Member since
    August 2005
Posted by rsog2000 on Saturday, October 10, 2009 9:29 PM
 keilau wrote:

A 2009 release from Bronco of the same ship, same scale is priced over $200.

 I guess that would explain why my LHS has a Bronco 1/200 Ka-28? I was trying to figure out why they didn't put it in 1/144 scale, this must be it, they just took the molding for the one included with the full kit and boxed it separately.

Only a few prefer liberty; the majority only want fair masters. --Sallust
  • Member since
    February 2006
  • From: Boston
Posted by Wilbur Wright on Saturday, October 10, 2009 7:51 PM

Well you could spend upwards of $1000 to get all the great stuff available for it through that site, however I paid $72 dollars for the kit and it looks pretty good. I had to thin out the funnels etc to get them to scale and use evergreen clear sheet styrene for the radar house glass. I also had to sand off the wood deck in most places as its not accurate.

I would go for it. That site link in this thread is fantastic for reference. I'll get photos up as soon as I can.

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: Toronto
Posted by BGuy on Saturday, October 10, 2009 5:15 PM
It may be a touch off topic but since people have brought up the Snowberry kit and I'm considering it for a project in the near future.  Those of you who have mentioned maybe getting some photos up online, could you please do so?  I'm especially interested in builds that have not been done with aftermarket stuff, so I can evaluate the debate about the kit's inadequacies for myself.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Windy city, US
Posted by keilau on Saturday, October 10, 2009 2:19 PM
 Wilbur Wright wrote:

I would add that I have built the Snowberry within the last two years and found it to be extremely enjoyable. There is a strong argument around however that it needs serious work to correct the innacuracies of the real thing. Looks great to me however. I've really got to get some photos up.

Yes. You can find information on all the different scale Flower Class Corvette on this site, including the Matchbox/Revell 1:72 scale Snowberry kit.

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Windy city, US
Posted by keilau on Saturday, October 10, 2009 1:49 PM

My vote for one of the best AND the best model for the money goes to the Trumpeter 03612 1:200 scale Sovremenny Class Destroyer Type 956. Not my most favorite modeling subject. But a high quality kit with small PE frets that makes possible a nice display model out of the  box without after market parts. It is one of the few recent (2002/2003) model release that caused a stir in the modeling community. See the multiple parts build report by Guido Hopp for details. I paid $45 for one in 2006. It is still on the Trumpeter online catalogue, but getting more difficult to find in the US. A 2009 release from Bronco of the same ship, same scale is priced over $200.

The Dragon 1/350 USS Buchanan and USS Gearing WW2 destroyer series are both outstanding kits. But the finished model is relatively small and they need aftermarket parts for railings. They should be in the top 10 for the quality at moderate price.

I have the Revell 1:144 scale Fletcher on special order by a LHS. Based on published reviews, it should be a good top 10 candidate. I will update when I see the kit.

There are many excellent injection molded kits above the $200 or more price mark, but they will not get my vote. If sky is the limit, there are many outstanding models or kits from motionmodels.com, modelshipmaster.com, BaD ship models and others. And the best among them is Fine Art Models. You can get a 1:96 scale Fletchers for a mere $6,500.00.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.