SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Question about PT boat bases in the Pacific

8913 views
39 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Question about PT boat bases in the Pacific
Posted by oddmanrush on Saturday, October 31, 2009 8:48 PM

Hi all,

I've got Italeri's 1/72 Elco 80' PT 117 in the works and I was planning on putting it in a small scene. Since the actual 117 was bombed at its dock, I wanted to recreate that scene. There were some PT boat stations on several islands such as Lumbari and Rendova in the Solomons. I've read that some of their temperary bases were known as 'bush berths' but I'm not familiar with the term and what exactly they would look like. 

My question is: is there anything specific I need to create when building a dock for a PT boat? Should I simply use my imagination? Or can some one shed some light on what exactly a 'bush berth' is? 

This question is a little vague but my knowledge on the subject isn't great. If no one really knows a specific answer, thats fine too, no hard feelings! I'll whip something up. But any help is appreciated!

Jon

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    March 2006
  • From: Bangor, Maine
Posted by alross2 on Sunday, November 1, 2009 6:45 AM

Here's a shot of 117 with her bow blown out.  Photo quality is not the best, but it will give you an idea of the surroundings.  This photo is in Bulkley's At Close Quarters, published by the GPO in 1962.

Al Ross

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Sunday, November 1, 2009 1:15 PM
Does anyone out there remember the old TV show McHale's Navy?  Any idea how close their base looked to the real thing?  Maybe they had a former PT Boater on staff as consultant.  If I remember right, the dock was a simple "T" with the boat docked alongside the top of the "T" so it could be put in action quickly.  The beach area leading to the dock always seemed a little too open though.  Too far for the crew to run to quickly, and the boat too much in the open for aerial spotters to see.  But it was TV afterall.Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by oddmanrush on Sunday, November 1, 2009 3:31 PM

Al, thanks for the response! I had actually seen that picture while researching this but I couldn't figure out if that was where the boat had been moored or if that is where it was beached after the attack. If it was moored there, I certainly don't see any dock or any where the crew could disembark.

tucchase, I do remember that TV show but haven't seen it in years and I can't say anything for its accuracy. A simple dock in the shape of a T wouldn't be hard to build. I'm intending on this being a small vignette so I'm not too concerned about its distance from the beach or anything. However, I am intending on placing an in-flight Oscar in the scene with it so any measures taken to disguise the base from aerial spotters may be significant.

I know what I've read states only that the base was attacked by 18 Japanese planes and doesn't get much more specific. So I may be taking a few liberties with placing an Oscar in the scene. Oh well, modeling is for enjoyment so I don't wanna get too hung up on details. Thanks for the pointers guys! I'll keep you posted as I go along.

Jon

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by PTConsultingNHR on Monday, November 2, 2009 8:39 AM

Well, a PT drew about 6 feet in draft, soooooooooooooo - based on that, you've got know how quickly the shoreline fell away where the boats were based or did the Navy dredged it out more for them?

Garth 

 

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 2:09 PM
oddmanrush, HI ; I think also that you would like to know that the boat in Mc HALES NAVY was a redo of a vosper boat. The boat in question drew 5 1/2' versus 6.2 feet for our ELCOS. The BUSH port was a likely spot well in cover, sometimes not, but, the Idea was to be able to get the boats underway quickly. See if you can get a copy of the movie JOHN WAYNE was in that dealt with P.T.s, the pier in there was as close as you,ll get.Not to far from shore, but in deep enough water to put the pedal to the metal(wood?) as fast as humanly possible. I saw the P.T. In FALL RIVER ,MASSACHUSSETTS and it,s a good source of info. Contact the FALL RIVER P.T.MUSEUM and I am sure they,ll be glad to help. I hope this gives you some help.    tankerbuilder
  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 8:57 PM
Wasn't Robert Mitchum in that movie with John Wayne.  I believe Wayne was a Cruiser Division Commander at Guadalcanal and Mitchum's son was a PT Boat Commander in the Gaudalcanal area.  The name of the movie is "In Harm's Way"
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 10:15 PM

I think that this is the movie that is being referred to:

File:They Were Expendable poster.jpg

Robert Montgomery was, in actuality, a WWII PT commander and took over directing this movie when John Ford became ill. It is said that he did such a good job of directing, that he got other directing jobs later. The movie won two Oscars.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 1:13 AM
I don't remember ever seeing this one!  Thought I had seen them all.  Now I gotta go find this one!
  • Member since
    March 2009
  • From: brisbane australia
Posted by surfsup on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:29 AM
Another movie to look at for Ideas is PT 109. It shows up Base details including the T Jetty. The movie also depicts an Airborne Attack on the PT Base. From what I remember, it is well shot in the Pacific and gives you a rough Idea for details that you might be looking for....Cheers Mark

If i was your wife, i'd poison your tea! If Iwas your husband, I would drink it! WINSTON CHURCHILL

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Tampa, Florida, USA
Posted by steves on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 7:45 AM

In "In Harm's Way" John Wayne's estranged son was a briefly a pt boat officer.

The photo section of this website:

http://www.pt-king.gdinc.com/

contains some photos of actual pt bases that you might find helpful.

 

Steve Sobieralski, Tampa Bay Ship Model Society

  • Member since
    May 2006
Posted by thunder1 on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 8:12 AM

If my memory serves me well, the final scene of the movie has two PT boats on flatbed trucks being transported to a river/lake to interdict the Japanese forces. That would make a great diorama in 1:35 scale. Does anyone recall the  movie scene?

Mike

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: Longmont, CO
Posted by wxltcol on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 11:23 AM

Yeah, they were on some kind of flatbed trailers with trucks pulling them, IIRC.  A great movie!

 In Harm's Way, John Wayne's son got killed during the attack on the Japanese task force.  He went back to PT boats after seeing how much of a louse the Congressman turned Commander really was.  Another epic movie.

Tom

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by oddmanrush on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 11:43 AM

Well it looks like I have my work cut out for me but if it includes watching John Wayne movies, I can live with that! Steve, thanks for that link. There are a lot of great looking photos there that should be useful.

I'm also playing with the idea of having the PT under way and under attack rather than being under attack at its mooring. I think visually, that would be more attractive and it would ease the pressure I put on myself to get the base looking just right. What do you guys think? 

Right now, the boat is painted basically two shades of gray. I've read the threads on PT colors, and I think that gray will work Ok.  The kit only came with 3 crew members, is there a place I can get a hold of more? Or perhaps I can fashion a few out of some extra 1/72 scale figures I've got in the spares box. Jeez, I'm getting chatty...

Thanks for the tips! Looks like I'll be wandering around the movie store, unless I can find it On Demand but I'm never that lucky!

Jon

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 1:12 PM
I was reading the History of the 109, prior to JFK taking command, on Steves link and it looked like a good choice of Japanese plane would be the "Pete" (a Zero with floats).  Apparently this was the main antagonist of the boats while they were out on patrol.  Anybody know if anyone has released a model of a Pete?
  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
Posted by stenscience on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:28 PM

I looked online to see if there were 1/72 Zero "Pete" varieties. Fujimi makes one variety-a recon plane with 2 floats. Hasegawa makes another with a single main float and outriggers. Both are listed at Squadron and presumably others. If the "pete" you are looking for is the biplane version, I don't know what to suggest

Regards,

Stenscience

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 2:36 PM
I doubt that it was the biplane version.  The article said it was a "Zero with floats", and that it became the worst nemesis the PT boats had.  As to which float configuration, it didn't specify.
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by oddmanrush on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 3:20 PM

Hmmm, so what you're saying is that the Ki-43 that I'm working on isn't a viable option to be doing battle, per se, with my PT boat? I guess this is where personal preference versus complete historical accuracy comes into play. I don't have a 1/72 Pete sitting in my stash and I'm not willing as yet to drop the dough for another kit. Maybe I should make this more of a ficticious encounter, not necessarily based on the story of the actual PT 117. I'm assuming that an Oscar would pounce on a PT if it saw it as a target of opportunity, so maybe this idea isn't too far off. Isn't it great how you can ask one question here and then wind up reassessing the layout of your entire project! Haha, you guys have been more than helpful with this!

Jon

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Santa Clarita, California
Posted by Jeffry on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 3:59 PM

Tamiya makes a 1/50 scale "Pete" Seaplane. Kit No. MA111 300.

Jeff 

Jeffry

 

http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/207583_510056863113_331200347_199122_4199748_n.jpg

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 4:20 PM
 oddmanrush wrote:

Hmmm, so what you're saying is that the Ki-43 that I'm working on isn't a viable option to be doing battle, per se, with my PT boat? I guess this is where personal preference versus complete historical accuracy comes into play. I don't have a 1/72 Pete sitting in my stash and I'm not willing as yet to drop the dough for another kit. Maybe I should make this more of a ficticious encounter, not necessarily based on the story of the actual PT 117. I'm assuming that an Oscar would pounce on a PT if it saw it as a target of opportunity, so maybe this idea isn't too far off. Isn't it great how you can ask one question here and then wind up reassessing the layout of your entire project! Haha, you guys have been more than helpful with this!

Jon

Nope! Not suggesting that at all.  Just letting you know about another option to consider once you mentioned maybe having the diorama of the boat underway.  I have no doubt the Oscar was one of the common planes used to bomb the bases, so it would be very appropriate for your diorama, either way.  If the Oscar hadn't been used in this area, I am sure someone else would have mentioned it by now.  You're going to post pics as you build aren't you? Question [?]

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Tampa, Florida, USA
Posted by steves on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 4:45 PM

A Zero with floats is a Rufe, not a Pete.

 

Steve Sobieralski, Tampa Bay Ship Model Society

  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by oddmanrush on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 4:52 PM

Tucchase, of course I'll be posting pictures as soon as I can. I've been delayed in my building because my basement (where my work bench is) has been taking on water during the recent rains. For a while, I was afraid that I'd be building the PT boat for my own transportation!Shock [:O] But the water is slowly evaporating and the dehumidifier is working overtime. I should, however, give you a little back ground to this project if you wish. This is a joint project, between my father and I. He doesn't like to paint, so he builds much of the model and I finish the small details, paint, and weather it. This is our way to get him back into the hobby after 13 years away from it and to have a little father son time. Its fun. So this is our 3rd project, I'm working concurrenlty on this and a B-25 Mitchell (he builds faster than I finish) so I'm a little bogged down.

Sorry, I get excited about builds tend to ask questions about issues I haven't even reached yet which may lead others to believe I'm a lot further along in my progress than I actually am, but as soon as I get the chance, I'll put some build pics up for you all.

Jon

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    October 2005
Posted by CG Bob on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 4:53 PM

 surfsup wrote:
Another movie to look at for Ideas is PT 109. It shows up Base details including the T Jetty. The movie also depicts an Airborne Attack on the PT Base. From what I remember, it is well shot in the Pacific and gives you a rough Idea for details that you might be looking for....Cheers Mark

That movie was filmed in the Florida Keys - east of Key West.  The actual island used for the PT Base is now a resort spa.   Apparently the local residents were quite concerned about the filming of the movie and the large military presence, as the Cuban Missile Crisis happened a few months earlier. 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 4:59 PM

A "zero with floats" is a Rufe, which is an IJN single float fighter that could also carry two small bombs.

A "Pete" is a biplane recon affair that could also carry two small bombs.

The Fujimi "type zero" kit with two floats is a "Glen", which is pretty purely a two seat recon aircraft.

A Ki-43 "Oscar" is an IJA aircraft that could do the job, but would have been operating from land.

I'd suggest the Rufe sounds about right, plus it's a really good looking airplane. Now of course, to most people in the Pacific, pretty much any Japanese fighter was a "Zero", so it's inconclusive, but is probably close to accurate for the 117. Lot's and lot's of companies sell these, and pretty cheap on eBay. You could probably get one for $ 10.

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:31 PM
 steves wrote:

A Zero with floats is a Rufe, not a Pete.

Interesting!  I was quoting from the PT-109 Unknown History link that was on the link you posted.  It is in the middle of the last paragraph on Page 3.

These Zero fighter planes on floats, code-named 'Pete' by the Allies, were the bastard cousins to 'Louie the Louse' and would soon become the newest addition in the Imperial Navy's repertoire of anti-PT tricks. To the PT crews, the Petes would quickly become their most hated adversaries for the rest of the fight for the Solo-mons.

  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:42 PM
 bondoman wrote:

A "zero with floats" is a Rufe, which is an IJN single float fighter that could also carry two small bombs.

A "Pete" is a biplane recon affair that could also carry two small bombs.

The Fujimi "type zero" kit with two floats is a "Glen", which is pretty purely a two seat recon aircraft.

A Ki-43 "Oscar" is an IJA aircraft that could do the job, but would have been operating from land.

I'd suggest the Rufe sounds about right, plus it's a really good looking airplane. Now of course, to most people in the Pacific, pretty much any Japanese fighter was a "Zero", so it's inconclusive, but is probably close to accurate for the 117. Lot's and lot's of companies sell these, and pretty cheap on eBay. You could probably get one for $ 10.

I think you've nailed it Bondoman.  The article talks about them carrying bombs as well as strafing them.  It also talks about their base being repeatedly bombed by land based planes, so the Oscar would be appropriate, right?  The base was in Tulagi, North of Guadalcanal.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:42 PM
 tucchase wrote:
 steves wrote:

A Zero with floats is a Rufe, not a Pete.

Interesting!  I was quoting from the PT-109 Unknown History link that was on the link you posted.  It is in the middle of the last paragraph on Page 3.

These Zero fighter planes on floats, code-named 'Pete' by the Allies, were the bastard cousins to 'Louie the Louse' and would soon become the newest addition in the Imperial Navy's repertoire of anti-PT tricks. To the PT crews, the Petes would quickly become their most hated adversaries for the rest of the fight for the Solo-mons.

Bulkley in his book called the attackers of 8/1/43 against Lumbari island "bombers".
  • Member since
    May 2008
Posted by tucchase on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 5:49 PM
oddmanrush, I just noticed on the PT-109 Unknown History, on Page 1, is a picture of PT-117, taken from the starboard rear of the boat.  Had you seen it?
  • Member since
    October 2008
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by oddmanrush on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 8:55 PM

"Bulkley in his book called the attackers of 8/1/43 against Lumbari island "bombers"."(sorry, I messed up the quote)

Bondoman, thats what I had read too. Since it was so inspecific, I figured that an Oscar could be just as good as any. I could certainly be wrong, and granted a Rufe might be a better option but I'm just working with what I have in stock. But I'll peruse the internet to see if I can find a good deal. 

Tucchase, when I first opened that link, I probably looked at every picture but those in the Unknown History section. I just looked at it now, and sure enough, it is a GREAT picture of the 117! Thanks for pointing that out. 

Well, I'm going to check the water level in the basement and assess my options here. This is a lot of interesting information which leaves me with some decisions to make! 

 

Jon

My Blog: The Combat Workshop 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, November 4, 2009 9:26 PM
Sure, go for it. A lot of web references call the 117 attackers "dive bombers" and there were eighteen planes in the strike. I suspect the term "dive" is self propogating in blogs. But, the numbers strongly suggest that floatplanes were not involved, of course it could have been a mixed bag, but it's open to your interpretation. And it can carry some serious bomb load.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.