SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

aircraft carrier jfk

3553 views
30 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
Posted by redbird15 on Wednesday, December 2, 2009 6:56 PM
 subfixer wrote:
It woould be a good thing to name CVN-79 Enterprise, but with the Navy trying to appease politicians by naming CVs after them (take Forrestal, Vinson and Stennis for instance) the odds are probably stacked against it.


Sadly, you're probably right. Forrestall I can half way understand, but Vinson & Stennis IMO are just plain BS. Since the Ticonderoga Class cruisers got Essex carrier names, the next Enterprise will probably be the lead ship of the follow on cruiser class.............Yuck!
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, December 2, 2009 6:46 PM
It woould be a good thing to name CVN-79 Enterprise, but with the Navy trying to appease politicians by naming CVs after them (take Forrestal, Vinson and Stennis for instance) the odds are probably stacked against it.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    January 2006
Posted by redbird15 on Wednesday, December 2, 2009 6:16 PM
With the Navy's (and publics) short sightedness in allowing the scrapping of CV-6, I would hope that many would rally & find a way to save CVN-65. If not, CVN-79 damn well BETTER be named ENTERPRISE! The Navy will not want to lose such a prized proud name and somehow USS ENTERPRISE DDG-One Oh Something or CG- Eighty Something just doesn't cut it.
  • Member since
    December 2003
Posted by dnatech on Tuesday, December 1, 2009 11:48 PM

I have been down to see the Midway 4 times, plus one overnight trip with my dad and my son. I love wandering around and each time we have gone they have had more areas restored and opened to the public. The display in the control tower replaying the opening of Desert Storm when she served as the command ship is very cool. Spending the night on her was very cool, and I have a new appreciation for anyone that goes to sea after trying to sleep in the crew compartment. Man those beds are tiny in the enlisted crew quarters. It was summer time and was warm, and we were sleeping in the forward crew berths, I cannot imagine trying to sleep in there with the pipes for the cats charged with steam. It must have been a sauna in there. Miday is well worth the trip down to see.

Steve 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Saturday, November 28, 2009 8:24 PM
I know about enginerooms, too, and I think that the less time spent there is beneficial to your health.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, November 28, 2009 8:05 PM
working in the engineroom sucks either way (trust me i know) might as well get them used to it
40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Saturday, November 28, 2009 8:03 PM

 navypitsnipe wrote:
that's why i said "if big navy thought about it ahead of time", as in before they built the new complex. now it would be pointless, they already have the school house for "A" school and power school, and yes, they do give housing allowances to those in prototype while they're in school. they have 2 converted boomers in charleston for prototype, as well as the civilian plant up in Balston Spa, NY near saratoga springs. a great program but very difficult, the attrition rate is pretty high

C'mon, would you want that deal? It's bad enough going to a school and then going to a ship, but starting off on a ship (a broken down and worn out one at that!) for what, two years?, and then go out to the fleet. That would suck.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:58 PM
that's why i said "if big navy thought about it ahead of time", as in before they built the new complex. now it would be pointless, they already have the school house for "A" school and power school, and yes, they do give housing allowances to those in prototype while they're in school. they have 2 converted boomers in charleston for prototype, as well as the civilian plant up in Balston Spa, NY near saratoga springs. a great program but very difficult, the attrition rate is pretty high
40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Saturday, November 28, 2009 7:50 PM
I think the Navy is over using 50s vintage reactor plants for training. While there are some surviving old prototypes out there and a couple of converted boomers are being used for training, the old ones are just too labor and maintenance intensive to keep trying to keep in service. The Prize is a prime example. The weapons station in Charleston is up the river and would require a lot of dredging and upgrades to accept an aircraft carrier. There are already training facilities in place, why would they need more? The students are perfectly fine in the quarters that are already provided for them and I don't think they even eat at a galley there, I think that get allowances. I think the Navy is just trying to leave well enough alone. Crawling into a reactor compartment on the Enterprise is like stepping back in time.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, November 28, 2009 6:58 PM

 subfixer wrote:
I know that you meant to say CVN-79, CVN-69 is the Eisenhower. You are correct in saying that the Big E wold be extremely expensive to maintain as a museum. The Nautilus was hard enough to transform into an exhibit and it is tiny compared to Enterprise. She only had one little reactor while the Prize has eight big ones.

if Big Navy had thought of it ahead of time, they would've decommissioned Big "E" and turned it into the Nuclear Power School down in Charleston. they could've anchored it in the river (or rather could've sunk it down into the mud) and transformed the hanger bay into a "school house". with that set up they could've had the "A" School, Power School, and Prototype school all onboard, plus all the berthings could have been used as well as the galley's

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: vernon hills illinois
Posted by sumpter250 on Saturday, November 28, 2009 1:42 PM
 subfixer wrote:
 stenscience wrote:

Some of the displays are a bit cheesy plastic (like the trays of fake bacon, eggs, french toast in the galley)but they really made a good effort to portray the working life of the ship.

 

Hey! What makes you think that the chow on those trays wasn't authentic?

Laugh [(-D]Chef [C=:-)]Laugh [(-D].....and.....the powdered eggs have bits of old egg shell in them to "fool the troops" into thinking the eggs are fresh!!!

Lead me not into temptation ..................I can find it myself

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Saturday, November 28, 2009 12:23 PM
 stenscience wrote:

Some of the displays are a bit cheesy plastic (like the trays of fake bacon, eggs, french toast in the galley)but they really made a good effort to portray the working life of the ship.

 

Hey! What makes you think that the chow on those trays wasn't authentic?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: Santa Fe, NM
Posted by stenscience on Saturday, November 28, 2009 12:17 PM

Regarding the Midway-I highly recommend it as a worthwhile visit. I visited it last year on a trip to San D. It is set up as it was just before decommissioning, and is a good way to see how the crew lived and worked. Some of the displays are a bit cheesy plastic (like the trays of fake bacon, eggs, french toast in the galley)but they really made a good effort to portray the working life of the ship. Very different from the Intrepid, for example by comparison.Plus, if you have never done the harbor tour, it is basically next door and IMHO very worth the money.

Regards,

Stenscience

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: vernon hills illinois
Posted by sumpter250 on Friday, November 27, 2009 2:34 PM

 subfixer wrote:
The Kennedy never has neen a very popular ship anyway. I don't know any former crewmen that ever talked affectionately about her. I know a lot of other carrier crewmen that talk derisively about how her frequent breakdowns affected them in a negative way. The "Can Opener" won't be terribly missed.

I know a few of the survivors of the Bellknap's "fling with Kennedy", who would cheer the passing of that ship, and would give up shaving if they thought she'd been used to make razor blades.

John F. Kennedy, the man, with his "Man-on-the-moon-this-decade" program, did more for modern technology than most know of, and should be remembered long and well. The ship that bears his name, perhaps, should be "let go of".  As a Destroyerman, I was never comfortable in "her" prescence.

Lead me not into temptation ..................I can find it myself

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Virginia
Posted by Mike F6F on Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:16 PM
Yup, CVN 79 for sure.

Mike

 

"Grumman on a Navy Airplane is like Sterling on Silver."

  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:59 PM

i know voluteers are a major part of upkeep and are hard to get too.

a Possible solution to me would be prisoners  most states have those ones you see cleaning highways or citiy streets ( either min sec types , or guys in for 2 bit stuff, or the pre release ones)

BTW   edgrune  your options are not wet blanket  they make total sense

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, November 26, 2009 2:22 PM
I know that you meant to say CVN-79, CVN-69 is the Eisenhower. You are correct in saying that the Big E wold be extremely expensive to maintain as a museum. The Nautilus was hard enough to transform into an exhibit and it is tiny compared to Enterprise. She only had one little reactor while the Prize has eight big ones.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Virginia
Posted by Mike F6F on Thursday, November 26, 2009 12:06 PM
The Kennedy was a bit of a troubled child from the beginning. She went from nuke to non-nuke during the planning and, if I remember correctly, even after construction started. Some things were just goofed up from the start and the ship had difficulties through its life.

I'm not sure right now, but I'm afraid the de-fueling of the Enterprise could require the ship to be gutted like a fish. Even if not, the Enterprise would be another very expensive ship to try and maintain.

A very worthy thing to consider would be working toward getting CVN 69 named Enterprise. The US needs a carrier named Enterprise serving in the fleet.

Mike

Mike

 

"Grumman on a Navy Airplane is like Sterling on Silver."

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:21 AM
Scrap her; let's focus on saving Enterprise...

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, November 26, 2009 7:57 AM
The Kennedy never has neen a very popular ship anyway. I don't know any former crewmen that ever talked affectionately about her. I know a lot of other carrier crewmen that talk derisively about how her frequent breakdowns affected them in a negative way. The "Can Opener" won't be terribly missed.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: West Virginia, USA
Posted by mfsob on Thursday, November 26, 2009 6:16 AM
Sadly, I would have to agree, that in the current economy ... the odds of the Kennedy ending up as something other than razor blades is not that good. Ships take a lot of work, whether they are active or not, and I can't see the Navy waiting around for years and years for a group to raise the millions it would take to give the Kennedy a viable home. Then again, the Navy seldom throws anything away ...  
  • Member since
    January 2009
  • From: San Antonio
Posted by paintsniffer on Thursday, November 26, 2009 5:57 AM

 subfixer wrote:
And Lexington is at Corpus Christi, Texas. What kind of shape is she in? I have also heard that Ranger is to go to a city in Oregon. Portland?

As of a few months ago the Lexington is in pretty good shape.. the airplanes on deck are another story. 

Excuse me.. Is that an Uzi?

  • Member since
    November 2003
  • From: Virginia
Posted by Mike F6F on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 5:52 PM
There was a group that tried to do a museum with the Forrestal, the money wasn't there and the Navy grew tired of waiting.

So, they went ahead and detoxed the ship in preparation to sink it as a reef somewhere.

I haven't heard anything about it for some time.

Mike

Mike

 

"Grumman on a Navy Airplane is like Sterling on Silver."

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:43 PM
And Lexington is at Corpus Christi, Texas. What kind of shape is she in? I have also heard that Ranger is to go to a city in Oregon. Portland?

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 3:08 PM
well you do have the Midway at San Diego... I need to go down there and go on board her one of these days...

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:55 PM
Norfolk wouldn't be viable. This is already the homeport for all of the East Coast carriers and tours are available on these ships when they are in port. It would be like carrying coal to Newcastle.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:51 PM
Boston would make sense... Massachusets, home state of the Kennedy's... Near USS Constitution, a nice contrast of the old and the new... and enough of historical tourist draws to potentially support another.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Mansfield, TX
Posted by EdGrune on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:38 PM

They say a boat is a hole in the water that you pour money into.

A ship is just a larger hole into which more money must be poured.

While it would be great to see significant ships preserved (and I will let you define significant for yourself),  the current economic situation just will not allow it.   The Yorktown in Patriots Point, SC is falling apart due to lack of funds.  (Hey Gov Sanford - how 'bout asking for a stimulus check!).   The Hornet in SanFrancisco is in bad shape.   The Texas is in need of a drydocking.   The Stewart & Cavalla were ravaged by Hurricane Ike and haven't been made right.    I fear that putting the Kennedy at Fall River or Quincy would draw from the volunteer staff needed to support their existing ships.  

To support an aircraft carrier you need a large-enough tourist base that will pay their admission fee to keep the thing painted and turn on the lights.  Boston, perhaps.  New York has the Intrepid, they're full.   Philly, no.  The JFK is too big for Baltimore's Inner Harbor,  .  Norfolk/Newport News wouldn't be bad.  They already have the Wisconsin, but ex-Navy might just support a carrier.      Wilmington - nope.  Charleston - nope.  Savannah - nope.  Perhaps Jacksonville/Mayport.

The funding to support a retired ship museum is an extensive and expensive proposition that needs to be thoroughly explored well in advance.  It may be better to let it go than do a half-a**ed job.

My wet blanket opinions

  • Member since
    July 2013
aircraft carrier jfk
Posted by DURR on Wednesday, November 25, 2009 11:41 AM

it was announced on the news today that the gov will donate this carrier to any state or city that is willing to turn it into a museum  

i would love to see it here in mass

either in battleship cove in fallriver  next to the wwII battlewagon uss massachusetts

or in quincy mass next to one of the last heavy cruisers  the uss salem

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.