SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

FR RICHELIEU battleship 1943 1/700 (finished)

4138 views
13 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Wednesday, December 7, 2011 9:01 AM

tigerman

Cool job. I like the camo. Unusual ship to say the least.

Hello Tigerman
I noticed that you like armor, did you see my "M1132 Stryker ESV" posted?

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Wednesday, December 7, 2011 8:59 AM

Hello Tigerman
I noticed that you like armor, did you see my "M1132 Stryker ESV" posted?

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Monday, November 7, 2011 9:24 PM

Cool job. I like the camo. Unusual ship to say the least.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Sunday, November 6, 2011 9:20 AM

Gunpla Master

Nice job, I have a foundness for this Grand Lady, she was more than capable of holding her own against any Axis BB, thought that test really never happened.  This vessel would serve well into the 60's.  You did a great job on the ship.  As pointed out, she did have limits on fire and control of weapons so close, but remember the tech. of the times and when she was laid down, few if any compaired to her!  Nice.  I hope to post another build thread of this lady in 1/200. BIGSurprise

Scratch-built 1:200?
  LOA: 1280mm Uff ....( Do not forget the space to exit the yard!)Wink
good luck

  • Member since
    May 2010
  • From: North Carolina
Posted by Gunpla Master on Thursday, November 3, 2011 8:54 PM

Nice job, I have a foundness for this Grand Lady, she was more than capable of holding her own against any Axis BB, thought that test really never happened.  This vessel would serve well into the 60's.  You did a great job on the ship.  As pointed out, she did have limits on fire and control of weapons so close, but remember the tech. of the times and when she was laid down, few if any compaired to her!  Nice.  I hope to post another build thread of this lady in 1/200. BIGSurprise

/ ]

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Friday, October 7, 2011 10:32 AM

TD4438

One of these days I'm gonna tackle battleship PE.I hope my results are similar to this.Two thumbs up!Toast

 

(PE 0,005 ") Warning! Very fragileConfused

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Friday, October 7, 2011 10:26 AM

bondoman

This ship is interesting reading. Again, great model and thanks for prompting a little research.

There's a bunch of problems associated with firing multiple guns next to each other from close by. Captain Mac knows a LOT more of this stuff, but a couple of basics are that there's a need to stagger the timing by a second or so, otherwise the shells can run into each other.

On this ship, the 15 inch guns were in pairs, although there was some thought put into the design of the gun rooms to separate them in order to minimize damage in a catastrophe.

But the pairs of guns exhibited a problem with wake effect between the shells, and weren't set up to fire in sequence, at least according to wiki.

But she served as a unit for the Allies 1943-1945, and wasn't decommissioned until 1967.

Yes, this problem of incompatibility of arms, was in constant time between the battleship

Weapons in 1943
Oerlikon x 48 20/70 a-a
14x4 Bofors 40mm (1,575 ") a-a
M1930 6x2 100/45 (100mm)a-a
M1936 3x3 155/55 (155mm)
M1953 2x4 380/45 (380mm) (15 ")

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
Posted by alexander47 on Friday, October 7, 2011 10:10 AM

MiG-29

WOW! looks great. Good Work. I didnt realize she had 4 Barrel Turrets!

Yes starting in 1943 and previous position of the aircraft platform

  • Member since
    September 2011
  • From: Earth (usually)
Posted by Centhot on Friday, October 7, 2011 5:59 AM

I don't know much about this ship, to be honest, but it looks good, nice build, and interesting colors!

2012 A/B/C: 10/3/0 (Acquired/Binned/Completed)

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by TD4438 on Friday, October 7, 2011 1:55 AM

One of these days I'm gonna tackle battleship PE.I hope my results are similar to this.Two thumbs up!Toast

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, October 7, 2011 12:43 AM

This ship is interesting reading. Again, great model and thanks for prompting a little research.

There's a bunch of problems associated with firing multiple guns next to each other from close by. Captain Mac knows a LOT more of this stuff, but a couple of basics are that there's a need to stagger the timing by a second or so, otherwise the shells can run into each other.

On this ship, the 15 inch guns were in pairs, although there was some thought put into the design of the gun rooms to separate them in order to minimize damage in a catastrophe.

But the pairs of guns exhibited a problem with wake effect between the shells, and weren't set up to fire in sequence, at least according to wiki.

But she served as a unit for the Allies 1943-1945, and wasn't decommissioned until 1967.

  • Member since
    November 2010
  • From: Australia
Posted by MiG-29 on Thursday, October 6, 2011 8:59 PM

WOW! looks great. Good Work. I didnt realize she had 4 Barrel Turrets!

                                                       "Superiority is our priority"

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, October 6, 2011 7:46 PM

I like it a lot. It's still a BIG ship at that scale. I know very little about her, but your model has prompted some reading.

  • Member since
    June 2011
  • From: Loures Portugal
FR RICHELIEU battleship 1943 1/700 (finished)
Posted by alexander47 on Thursday, October 6, 2011 2:32 PM

model

Kit / plastic 1 / 700
The extra kit: PE thickness (0.005 ")
Rails: 45.5 "
Ladders back-breaking type: 9.0 "

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.