SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Scientific Models U.S.S. Constitution

7899 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, February 12, 2012 11:18 AM

warshipguy

Don,

Do you remember any of the detail issues with the kit?

Bill

'

Yeah, the fittings supplied were really cheap.  Fortunately, there was a great source of ship modeling supply, AJ Fisher, only a few miles from our house in Detroit, so for that kit I drove to Fisher's and bought some decent fittings (deadeyes and blocks).

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: CT
Posted by Seamac on Saturday, February 11, 2012 10:42 PM

Hello All,

I know there are 2 versions of the Scientific Constitution model - the older is smaller, less detailed and looks to be much more of a job to build.  The other model I am aware of was the "Bi-Centennial" ediditon (K300 I think), builds to 28" L, has a pre-carved either poplar or clear pine (rather than balsa as in the smaller kit) hull, much more and better detail in both wood and cast fittings.

I haven't built either (or many wood ship models for that matter, yet) but early Model Shipway, Marine Models, Tru Scale, etc. are a step or 2 above the larger kit.  It looks like Don has done a remarkable job on the kit!  Don, is your model the smaller kit or was the larger kit available before 1976?  If that is the smaller, then you are a MASTER BUILDER as the parts in that kit as supplied would make something more resembling a kids bathtub toy if well built (and something less attractive if not). 

That's my opinion and I am sticking to it...  unless I change my mind.

Seamac
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Saturday, February 11, 2012 4:36 PM

Don,

Do you remember any of the detail issues with the kit?

Bill

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Saturday, February 11, 2012 9:47 AM

Got around to finding and scanning the photo I mentioned in above post.  Photo is dated 1957 but I am sure I built it a couple of years before that.  Didn't have a very good camera then, so pic is not very good.

Built it to give to my Dad, and he wanted a different paint scheme, so it is colorful but not very authentic :-(

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Friday, February 10, 2012 10:34 AM

Dan,

I'd love to see it!

Bill

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Friday, February 10, 2012 9:48 AM

Boy, what a memory!  I built that kit in the mid fifties. I believe I have a picture of it in a scrapbook.  I will try to find it to scan and post it.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Friday, February 10, 2012 9:34 AM

One issue that I have with the kit is that I'm not sure of the period it is supposed to represent. All the spar deck guns are wheeled cannons; no carronades are present.  I believe that she was so armed when built but shortly after commissioning shifted to carronades on the spar deck.  But, there is no Herculean figurehead, which she carried until shot away at Tripoli.  I haven't looked closely enough at other details, I just put mine on a shelf in the basement and said thank you to my son for the gift.  I haven't had  the heart to sell it.

Bill

  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: Sarasota, FL
Posted by RedCorvette on Friday, February 10, 2012 6:30 AM

I've also got one that was given to me.   The fact that people give them away is probably a hint...

It has a blanked out solid hull that takes a lot of shaping and sanding.  I would suspect that's a big reason why so many first-time wooden ship modelers get bored and/or frustrated with it and give up.

I would categorize the kit as more of a "representation" rather than a scale model.  

That being said, it does provide the opportunity to learn and practice some wood modeling skills, but is going to take some serious time or effort to complete. 

If I ever finish mine I'll probably use it as a decorative piece on a bookshelf  or coffee table.

Mark

FSM Charter Subscriber

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, February 9, 2012 10:23 AM

There are a couple of build blogs on the net, however I couldn't find any finished.

I had a Scientific Cutty Sark that I eventually gave to a friend who is more of a wood worker type.

I guess it depends on your priorities.

 

If you are looking for an accurate and detailed model, there are lot's of better and easier choices.

Looks like that kit might bring you or your friend $ 60 -$ 70 on ebay from a collector.

But, if you take the time and effort, I'm sure you'd be proud of the results.I for one would certainly be impressed.

  • Member since
    February 2011
Scientific Models U.S.S. Constitution
Posted by yzfrider2001 on Thursday, February 9, 2012 9:44 AM

I was given a Scientific Models U.S.S. Constitution kit by a friend and am having a difficult time finding any information on it. Is it a decent kit that builds into a fair (hopefully good) representation of the Constitution, or is it a waste of time? Thanks in advance!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.