Enter keywords or a search phrase below:
Is the Tamiya 1/350 Missouri with the correct full hull?
Correct as in; is it a full hull? It is a full hull, I have no idea if it isn't correct or not. I haven't heard anything to the contrary.
I'm from the government and I'm here to help.
Full.
Occasional factual, grammatical, or spelling variations are inherent to this thesis and should not be considered as defects, as they enhance the individuality and character of this document.
If remembered right there was a comment that it is not a complete full hull so I was thinking that it needs to be corrected, more bottom perhaps?
You may be confusing the 1/350 kit with the 1/700 kit.
The 1/350 kit has a full hull.
http://www.tamiya.com/english/products/78018missouri/index.htm
The 1/700 kit is a waterline kit
http://www.tamiya.com/english/products/31613missouri/index.htm
Or are you perhaps thinking of the old Revell kit which has the flat-bottomed hull?
Some Revell kits came with incomplete below the waterline hulls- Tanker Glasgow, Steamship Hawaiian Pilot are examples.
There WAS a confusing thread a few months back about this, but the kit does come with a full hull.
Modeling is an excuse to buy books.
What I am asking actually is if the full hull of the Tamiya 1/350 USS Missouri is the correct shape. I'm sorry for the confusion.
The Missouri has been out for many years and I have never heard any complaints about the hull.
"A man cannot say he has fully lived until he has built a model ship"
Ronald Reagan
www.quuxuum.org/.../shiprevs.html
Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.