SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Mirage 1/400 IJN P-102 (ex-USS STEWART) -- Build and mini-review

5516 views
8 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Towson MD
Mirage 1/400 IJN P-102 (ex-USS STEWART) -- Build and mini-review
Posted by gregbale on Wednesday, July 9, 2014 12:24 PM

This is the Mirage 1/400 kit of the IJN Patrol Boat P-102, which had one of the more intriguing histories of any WW2 warship.

The four-stacker Clemson-class destroyer USS Stewart (DD224) was damaged in the Battle of Badung Strait in February 1942, and drydocked at Surabaya (Java) for repairs, where she was further damaged by falling off her keel blocks. With the port under enemy air attack the ship could not be repaired, so she was ordered destroyed ahead of the advancing Japanese forces. Demolition charges were set off within the ship, and she sustained further damage when a Japanese bomb hit amidships. When the port was evacuated on 2 March, the drydock containing her was scuttled. Her name was struck from the Navy list and was soon assigned to a new destroyer escort, DE238.

However, when the Japanese occupied Surabaya, they raised and refitted the hull, adding the characteristic trunked funnel replacing the Stewart's 2 forward funnels, and eventually installing the standard tripod mast. She was rearmed and refitted with Japanese equipment, and commissioned in the IJN as Patrol Boat 102 in September 1943, and operated with the Japanese Southwest Area Fleet on escort duty. In this role she had a hand in sinking the renowned Gato-class sub USS Harder in 1944.

In August 1945, she was found by American occupation forces laid up in Hiro Bay near Kure. She was recommissioned in the USN and sailed for home, though she eventually had to be towed back to San Francisco when her engines failed.

DD224 was again struck from the Navy list and decommissioned in 1946, and sunk off San Francisco as a target for aircraft.

I am a big fan of the old four-stacker destroyers, and a huge fan of Mirage's line of kits of the same, though there are some issues. The kits are designed so that every cleat, bollard and fitting is supplied as a separate piece to be cut, painstakingly cleaned and then attached. Same goes for things like the boat davit assemblies, each constructed from a dozen or so parts with no attachment sockets and few locating markings. As if that weren't bad enough, the moldings are delicate and the plastic brittle, so certain items (like yards and flagpoles) simply cannot be cut from the sprues by any method without a high probability of damage. The instructions are “busy” --OK, more like “frantic”-- with tiny arrows and not-terribly-clear scrap views going all over the place., but they do supply drawings for every step that show what the completed assembly is supposed to look like, which helps a bit.

The good news is that there are plenty of extras and spare parts (since different ships in the series are crafted with different sets of sprues), the moldings are reasonably delicate and as to-scale as is practical, and the kits (at least where I have acquired them) are insanely inexpensive. I've got a whole fleet lined up, which, when completed, will mostly fit in the space of a single sheet of paper.

I chose to depict her in Japanese service with no added markings, though the kit sheet supplies markings for her repatriation scheme with numbers and Japanese flag for the hull. I built the kit more or less straight OOB, adding only assorted PE rails and ladders (mainly from Tom's Modelworks), and minimal rigging with stretched sprue. In a moment of wandering inattention I screwed up and put the prop guard braces on the bottom instead of the top of the guard where they belong, but didn't feel like tearing it out and repainting. Colors are Tamiya acrylics, weathered with artists oils.

My next project in the series will be one of the lot—probably the Ward—in her “as built” configuration, complete with WW1 dazzle scheme. I've acquired both the GMM and White Ensign PE sets to fit her out, so there's lots of building fun in store.

Hope you enjoy the pics.

Greg

George Lewis:

"Every time you correct me on my grammar I love you a little fewer."
 
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Wednesday, July 9, 2014 2:20 PM

Thank you for the interesting story- I had not read that before.

Great looking model too.

I'll look at Mirage's kits, I like that scale.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Thursday, July 10, 2014 10:33 AM

I love 1/400 scale. They are large enough to be easily detailed while being small enough to be easily displayed. They are quite inexpensive compared with 1/350 scale ships. And they are of very interesting and rare subjects. The Mirage kits are nice . . . they also manufacture many different U-Boats in many different versions, even the diminutive Type II. There are decent photo etch sets for these kits as well as some resin conversion sets. They are an enjoyable build!

Your P-102 is nicely done! It is also an interesting subject. However, those upside-down prop guards are noticeable. It should be easy enough to correct them.

Bill

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Friday, July 11, 2014 8:17 AM

Aha !

      So you got that one .I got the U.S.S. Ward And the U.S.S. Butler ( a D.E. ) and I will tell you this . At 1/400 they are tiny ( as tiny as I want to go ) . Now for the comment about all those widdle-bitty parts . I wish All companies did this . Although a pain , It looks so much better than molded on detail .

Also think , Mirage also has a very odd makeup of ships that certainly are not dull  .I not only have the same ships in paper , but all in plastic from Mirage . Some ships demand high dollar spending like the Hasegawa version of the " HIKAWA-MARU " . Thanks to Mirage and a papermodel company , I have Four iterations of this one ship !

.The paper model looks great with all the widdle - bitty Parts from Mirage I've built up over time .On that note have you ever tried shaping a P.E. Stokes litter in this scale ? He! He! Good luck on your group and thanks for the pictures , very nice job indeed .You got the history right too !

Tanker - Builder

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Friday, July 11, 2014 8:42 AM

1/400 is a popular scale in paper, as well as in plastic in Europe.  JSC offers an extensive range in 1/400 that look very nice when built!.  This range includes many ships that are simply not available in plastic or resin, as well as ships that are horrendously expensive in 1/350 scale. Also, many ships are offered in 1/200 and 1/250 scale that can be scaled down to 1/400 quite easily by re-printing on your printer, including many WWI warships and pre-dreadnoughts. And, there are after-market detail sets available for these ships!

Bill Morrison

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Towson MD
Posted by gregbale on Friday, July 11, 2014 12:58 PM

I am also a big fan of 1/400 scale for ships of all sorts and eras, and the paper models available in the scale are challenging as well as impressive when  built. I've got the JSC Edmund Fitzgerald and the victory ship "Mexico Victory" waiting on the ways.

As to the Mirage four-stackers, I've got several of the Wards, the Noa w/seaplane, several HMS Montgomerys, the HNoMS St Albans and the St Nazaire version of HMS Campbeltown. [I love four-stacker destroyers!] The White Ensign PE set has fittings for many of the RN lend-lease ships, while the Gold Medal PE set is mainly US fittings. Both look like excellent sets, and I look forward to using them.

Thanks to all for your comments.

Greg

George Lewis:

"Every time you correct me on my grammar I love you a little fewer."
 
  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Groton, CT
Posted by warshipguy on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:44 AM

I just picked up the Mirage 1/400 HMS Campbeltown and was amazed that something so small would have so many deck fittings. Wow!

Bill

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 8:55 AM

Hi ;

     You think that's amazing .Figure in a Buckley class from them and you have a downright beautiful little ship

      Stokes litters and all ! I know many ships from that time were painted in that awful dark Blue .Don't do it ! All your work will disappear in the darkness !

  From now on My ships are going to be dazzle or other camo or just plain Navy grey !

  • Member since
    February 2007
  • From: Brunswick, Ohio
Posted by Buckeye on Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:29 AM

Very nice build with a interesting history behind it.

Mike

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.