SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

USS ESSEX Question

2260 views
6 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
USS ESSEX Question
Posted by PTConsultingNHR on Monday, July 24, 2017 1:25 PM
Hello Guys,
 
Just confirming something.
 
The USS ESSEX, CV-9, ... When did she wear Measure 33-10A?  80-G-170025 says 1-19-1944. 
 
 Pattern_sheet%2C_MS-33_10A_for_Essex_class by Tim Connelly, on Flickr
 
And, the Mariana’s Turkey Shoot took place on June 19th and 20th, 1944.  So – would Measure 33-10A be accurate for the ESSEX during that operation?
 

 

Tim
  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Monday, July 24, 2017 1:33 PM

As far as I can tell...never.

Snyder and Short says M21 in 1943, M32, 6-10d in 1944, and back to M21 in 1945.

Navsource shows a number of photos of CV-9 after refit in San Francisco, where it is stated that in April 1944 she was repainted M32, 6-10d.

Her immediate successor CV-10 was painted in the measure- pattern you show.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by PTConsultingNHR on Monday, July 24, 2017 2:57 PM
Hi, A modeler named Scott Dunn just told me that ESSEX was in Measure 32-6D at the time of the Mariana’s Turkey Shoot …  20375724_10211989003614237_3832709988110055193_n by Tim Connelly, on Flickr Tim
  • Member since
    May 2008
  • From: Wyoming Michigan
Posted by ejhammer on Monday, July 24, 2017 2:58 PM

USS ESSEX CV-9

Commissioning to refit April 1944 carried Measure 21. From refit to at least 25 November 1944 (the Kamikaze hit) carried measure 32/6-10D. She was the only carrier that ever had this camo. The change back to measure 21 may have been done at Ulithi while undergoing flight deck repairs.

EJ

Assistant Treasurer

USS ESSEX CV/CVA/CVS-9/LHD-2 Association

Completed - 1/525 Round Two Lindberg repop of T2A tanker done as USS MATTAPONI, USS ESSEX 1/700 Hasegawa Dec 1942, USS Yorktown 1/700 Trumpeter 1943. In The Yards - USS ESSEX 1/700 Hasegawa 1945, USS ESSEX 1/700 Dragon 1944, USS ESSEX 1/700 Trumpeter 1945, USS ESSEX 1/540 Revell (vintage) 1962, USS ESSEX 1/350 Trumpeter 1942, USS ESSEX LHD-2 as commissioned, converted from USS Wasp kit Gallery Models. Plus 35 other plastic and wood ship kits.

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by PTConsultingNHR on Tuesday, August 1, 2017 2:10 PM

Hi.

 

May I ask all of you a question?  For a 1:700 CV, like the ESSEX, would you use invisible fishing line for the rigging?

 

Tim

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Tuesday, August 1, 2017 3:34 PM

I think so. I used to swear by the elastic stuff called EZ Line, but I'm having my second thoughts now. It's breaking on it's own on some of the models I have used it on. And my spool of it sort of melted and is useless.

Now I'm back to using thin monofilament. There's a thin one made for fly tying called Uni Caenis. One nice thing is that it holds knots.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Wednesday, August 2, 2017 9:21 AM

I also have switched to the monofilament fly tying thread.  I have some 5 mil stuff- two rolls, one black, and one white/translucent.  I use it on smaller ships and smaller scale, like 1:700. It looks fantanstic- you can barely see it.

However, that brings up a problem.  When I am doing the rigging, I can barely see it- at times it completely disappears, even though I wear 2.25 diopter cheaters when doing rigging.  I have found something that helps.  I have made to backdrops of foamcore, one white, the other black.  I use whichever is the complement to the color thread I am using.  When the thread is seen against that backdrop, it is visible.  However, when I try to see either thread against the ship- looking downward towards the deck, it disappears if the ship has a medium gray finish!  Then rigging gets really hard!

My philosphy has been that oversize rigging is worse looking than undersize, and I always try to err on the side of thinner rigging.  But now that I can get stuff that is that thin, I have the dilemma- thread that is too thin to be visible is a real struggle.

In thicker stuff I try to pick color that will reduce contrast, which makes it look thinner (I won't get into the visibility theory on which that statement is based).  In thicker threads that give me a choice of color, that is a good way to do it- pick a medium gray or cream or tan color- but that ultra thin stuff does not give you much choice of color.

As a final thought- really good, positionable lighting is really important in rigging small scale models.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.