SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Yorktown class carrier islands - update and partial retraction

543 views
1 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Yorktown class carrier islands - update and partial retraction
Posted by jtilley on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:59 PM
In several earlier posts I've mentioned a peculiarity in the island design of the Yorktown- class carriers, Yorktown, Enterprise, and Hornet. On the basis of the Navy "Booklet of General Plans" drawings for the Yorktown, I noted that there was an odd - and pretty conspicuous - open space in the front of the stack. It's marked "void" on the plans, and takes the form of a vertical gap running from the cap to the base of the stack. None of the kit manufacturers has noticed it.

My good friend Mike Dillard and I have been studying all the photos we can find of the three ships' islands. Finding pictures that show "the gap" is tricky. The front of the stack is usually blocked out by the mast and other equipment on the island just ahead of it. We're both convinced that the gap was present on the Yorktown and Enterprise throughout their careers. (As a matter of fact it's still present on the Yorktown. The gap is quite prominent in several photographs of the wreck.) We both are pretty firmly convinced, however, that the Hornet's stack didn't have the gap. Apparently this was one more minor difference between the Hornet and the other two ships. (The most conspicuous difference, as several other forum participants have noted, was the shape of the flight deck forward.)

I therefore apologize for my earlier gentle rebuke of the excellent Trumpeter Hornet kit: the manufacturer got it right. The stack in the kit is correct for the Hornet - though it would need to be altered for an Enterprise or Yorktown conversion.

Trumpeter - and, so far as I know, every other kit manufacturer - did make one small goof regarding the stack. It has three uptakes, each with a circular cap. The after one, for some reason, is supposed to be a little smaller in diameter than the others. That wouldn't be difficult to fix. I wonder if any of the aftermarket photo-etched sets caught it.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:54 PM
The third (most stern) uptake is smaller in diameter then the other two, I just finished building the Trumpeter kit, and it is sitting here on the computer table next to me. The WEM set I used for PE also has PE replacements that are correct as well.
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.