SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

I'll probably get shot for this but this kit makes me long for the quality of Lindberg kits......

2157 views
23 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2005
I'll probably get shot for this but this kit makes me long for the quality of Lindberg kits......
Posted by Ron Smith on Saturday, May 20, 2006 10:09 PM
Someone gave me a Trumpeter The Sullivans today and words to accurately sum up just how bad it is would all be censored . I really didn't think it was possible but they made a crappier kit than their North Carolina.

No joke the USS The Sullivans by Trumpeter is an almost complete waste of plastic. You can use the hull and major structures but if you want something that doesn't resemble the old Lindberg motorized battleships you might as well resign yourself to sanding off all the detail including everything but the locators for the deckhouses off the decks. Plan on puttying and sanding the turret seams and replacing the turret hatches, don't even bother looking at the directors, 20mm's and 40mm's Swipe a set of stacks from a Tamiya kit, sand the "walkways" off all the decks, replace all hatches/doors/scuttles. Sand off and replace all the bracing details (a fair number of which are not even close to plumb), don't forget to sand off the half-assed attempts at ladders (at least the aztek stairs are separate parts). Will Trumpeter *ever* get a clue what hawse pipes are and what they look like? Also plan on moving the hull side exits for the hawse pipes, no biggie since what's there is not even a bad joke. While you're swiping the stacks from a Tamiya kit swipe the main director, torpedo tubes, torpedo tube doghouse, rafts and aft prop-shaft brace (the thing Trumpeter molded is more appropriate to a BB it's so clunky). So-so attempt at K-guns. What I think are torpedo and AA directors at best vaguley resemble the real thing.....if that. The depth charge loading davits are clunky (OK, so I'm being overly kind there). Plan on somehow making chocks and replacing the anemic bitts.

I'll give them this, while crudely molded the props are slightly better than Tamiya's in shape and you can actually use the prop shafts.

It's obvious they copied Tamiya's kit but the result looks like what a Xerox machine on a bad acid trip might produce. They should slap a $2 price sticker on this pig and sell it at the dollar store to kids. Kids won't mind $2 for something to throw together with tube glue and glossy square bottle Testors paint to have something to shoot at with BB guns then give the old Viking funeral with firecrackers.
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Burlington, Ontario Canada
Posted by gburdon on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 4:16 PM

 Ron Smith wrote:
Someone gave me a Trumpeter The Sullivans today and words to accurately sum up just how bad it is would all be censored . I really didn't think it was possible but they made a crappier kit than their North Carolina.

No joke the USS The Sullivans by Trumpeter is an almost complete waste of plastic. You can use the hull and major structures but if you want something that doesn't resemble the old Lindberg motorized battleships you might as well resign yourself to sanding off all the detail including everything but the locators for the deckhouses off the decks. Plan on puttying and sanding the turret seams and replacing the turret hatches, don't even bother looking at the directors, 20mm's and 40mm's Swipe a set of stacks from a Tamiya kit, sand the "walkways" off all the decks, replace all hatches/doors/scuttles. Sand off and replace all the bracing details (a fair number of which are not even close to plumb), don't forget to sand off the half-assed attempts at ladders (at least the aztek stairs are separate parts). Will Trumpeter *ever* get a clue what hawse pipes are and what they look like? Also plan on moving the hull side exits for the hawse pipes, no biggie since what's there is not even a bad joke. While you're swiping the stacks from a Tamiya kit swipe the main director, torpedo tubes, torpedo tube doghouse, rafts and aft prop-shaft brace (the thing Trumpeter molded is more appropriate to a BB it's so clunky). So-so attempt at K-guns. What I think are torpedo and AA directors at best vaguley resemble the real thing.....if that. The depth charge loading davits are clunky (OK, so I'm being overly kind there). Plan on somehow making chocks and replacing the anemic bitts.

I'll give them this, while crudely molded the props are slightly better than Tamiya's in shape and you can actually use the prop shafts.

It's obvious they copied Tamiya's kit but the result looks like what a Xerox machine on a bad acid trip might produce. They should slap a $2 price sticker on this pig and sell it at the dollar store to kids. Kids won't mind $2 for something to throw together with tube glue and glossy square bottle Testors paint to have something to shoot at with BB guns then give the old Viking funeral with firecrackers.

Ron;

I have not personally seen this kit, however if it is anything like the care the actual ship has had it would not surprise me. I recently visited the ship in Buffalo New York and I am sorry to report the care (or lack there of) extends from the horrible repainting of the ship right through to the displays in the "museum" everything seems to be cobbled together at the dime store level.

Cheers;

Gregory

VETERAN - (Noun) - Definition - One who signed a blank cheque as: “Payable to The People of Canada, Up To and Including My Life."
  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 10:56 PM
 gburdon wrote:
I have not personally seen this kit, however if it is anything like the care the actual ship has had it would not surprise me. I recently visited the ship in Buffalo New York and I am sorry to report the care (or lack there of) extends from the horrible repainting of the ship right through to the displays in the "museum" everything seems to be cobbled together at the dime store level.


Have a look: http://www.specwarnet.net/ron/sullivans/sullivansindex.html
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Burlington, Ontario Canada
Posted by gburdon on Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:08 AM

Ron;

Now I see what you mean. That has to be the biggest waste of good styrene I have seen in a long time.

It reminds me of kits my friends and I used to build to blow up on the creek behind the house when we were kids. The kind of kit you bought for nothing and laughed yourself silly when it blew apart with some homemade firecrackers in the hull.

There is the hope of a re-release or two or three until they get it right eh!

Cheers;

Gregory

VETERAN - (Noun) - Definition - One who signed a blank cheque as: “Payable to The People of Canada, Up To and Including My Life."
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Southern California, USA
Posted by ABARNE on Thursday, May 25, 2006 1:09 AM

Well Ron, I guess what they say about about a picture being worth a thousand words is true.  Initially, I thought your first post was probably something of rant.  After seeing the comparitiv photos, it seems as though you were actually a bit restrained!  Although I'm still surprised at the how much more kits cost these days compared to what I spent as a kid, I don't mind too much if the kit is quality kit.  If picked up something like that, I would probably immediately consign it to future use for testing experimental building and painting techniques.

Andy

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:28 AM
 gburdon wrote:
Now I see what you mean. That has to be the biggest waste of good styrene I have seen in a long time.

It reminds me of kits my friends and I used to build to blow up on the creek behind the house when we were kids. The kind of kit you bought for nothing and laughed yourself silly when it blew apart with some homemade firecrackers in the hull.

There is the hope of a re-release or two or three until they get it right eh!


Now you see why I mentioned the old Lindberg battleships, they compare favorably.

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Thursday, May 25, 2006 3:40 AM
 ABARNE wrote:
Well Ron, I guess what they say about about a picture being worth a thousand words is true.  Initially, I thought your first post was probably something of rant.  After seeing the comparitiv photos, it seems as though you were actually a bit restrained!  Although I'm still surprised at the how much more kits cost these days compared to what I spent as a kid, I don't mind too much if the kit is quality kit.  If picked up something like that, I would probably immediately consign it to future use for testing experimental building and painting techniques.


I'm not one to slag a kit just to slag it but I also refuse to blow sunshine up nether regions when I know just how bad a kit is. On the ship sites I have clearly stated this kit is a great aftermarket accessory for the Tamiya kit, which also has major warts. All told it's as cheap to buy the resin Yankee Modelworks Johnston and you won't have the frustration level building it either.

Trumpeter has flat out fallen on their face the last three 1/350 USN kits..........CV-2 major fit problems due to poor engineering and MAJOR accuracy problems resulting from them not buying the correct plans and photos for the fit they kitted. North Carolina- horrid fit, very poor engineering, sloppy machining, serious accuracy issues arising from both the previous problems and then some (the ship and over 20,000 original drawings are all in one place). Sullivans-well you just saw what junk it is.

When I review a kit I prefer to do a build review or post build synopsis, Sullivans just wasn't worth wasting the time. I look at parts fit, engineering of the kit, consistency and fineness of detail and then accuracy. I also have three main questions I keep in mind:

1-How will a first or second time ship modeller react to the fit, engineering of the parts and finished look of the kit?

2-Would it embarrass me to build it OOB and put it on a show table?

3-Using MSRP does the kit require so much after market to correct problems that the cost exceeds, equals or aprroaches a resin kit? Note-in the case of BB's and carriers my cost figure goes to "does the cost to correct the kit more than double the MSRP of the kit?"

CV-2 failed questions 1 and 3, accuracy, engineering and fit.

BB-55 failed all three questions, accuracy, fit, parts engineering, detail consistency.

Sullivans pretty much failed everything miserably (I have not yet checked the fit and I'm not going to, it's not worth the time). I have a spare Tamiya kit that has a hosed up hull I got in a swap and enough PE and resin extras to replace everything wrong on the Trumpy kit, the point is, you shouldn't have to do that.

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: 37deg 40.13' N 95deg 29.10'W
Posted by scottrc on Thursday, May 25, 2006 7:05 AM
I'm glad I'm not the only one who has felt this way about most of the Trumpeter releases after buildnig one.  It seemed whenever I questioned the accuracy and engineering of one of their kits, I needed to prepare for a flame.

Scott

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Thursday, May 25, 2006 10:55 AM
 scottrc wrote:
I'm glad I'm not the only one who has felt this way about most of the Trumpeter releases after buildnig one.  It seemed whenever I questioned the accuracy and engineering of one of their kits, I needed to prepare for a flame.


You're not alone, I can live with the few problems on the Essexes because it's almost impossible to kit anything but ship X at time Y and if you're lucky one other ship will have that exact same configuration. PE will also fix most of the problems (don't forget after people complained about it, they fixed the flight deck round down problem of the initial release). The Liberty isn't perfect but that's a class of over 1000 vessels and again PE fixes most of the problems. But since Franklin the USN kits have been nothing but steadily worsening products.

I hear the Soviet ships are nice but I also hear they have major problems, personally I don't care since I have no interest in them. There is a stunning silence about Hood on the web..........you'd think after all the whinging for a new 1/350 kit that's gone on the past decade that *somebody* from that camp had a comment. I do hear some good things from people I trust but I've heard almost as many negatives. I'll probably never know myself since I have almost as much interest in Hood as I do the Soviet ships or USN subjects after 1945.
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Thursday, May 25, 2006 11:46 AM
Pitt-Tee-Full !!

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Saturday, May 27, 2006 10:52 PM

i bought 2 of their chinese destroyers 1/350 scale and

i have come to the conclusion that it would be less work to melt them down and shape the plastic rather than build the models   Censored [censored] Sad [:(]

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Singapore
Posted by Tankbuster on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 8:28 PM

When I first saw and advertisement of the Sullivans release from Trumpeter, I was anxious to get one. Now that I see what I was waiting for, I think I hold off until Trumpeter does a complete overhaul! (Yea Right).

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Salisbury Massachucetts USA
Posted by PanzerWulff on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:15 AM
Ok being the "Tread Head" that I am I had gone out and bought this kit to try to build my fathers ship DD-510 USS Eaton which was a square bridge fletcher like the USS The Sullivans.But what I first thought was a good kit turns out to be in the eyes of the guys on this thread who know WAY more than I do about model ships a TOTAL LEMONShock [:O]Sad [:(]Boohoo [BH]. I was going to try to get some AM detail parts to spruce it up even before reading this thread, but other than the PE sets I was going to get where can i find some AM 20mm's at least. Some of the probs mentioned I can deal with myself (such as the doghouse inaccuracies) and the detail sets should deal with some of the others but those 20mm's are horrendous as you guys mention. Any help for this Rookie Ship modeler would be greatly appreciatedBow [bow]
ACE??? you were NEVER an ace AN ace HOLE maybe! (Lister to Rimmer on BBC's RED DWARF) Chris"Hey GRAVITY still works"Gray
  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:25 AM
 PanzerWulff wrote:
Ok being the "Tread Head" that I am I had gone out and bought this kit to try to build my fathers ship DD-510 USS Eaton which was a square bridge fletcher like the USS The Sullivans.But what I first thought was a good kit turns out to be in the eyes of the guys on this thread who know WAY more than I do about model ships a TOTAL LEMONShock [:O]Sad [:(]Boohoo [BH]. I was going to try to get some AM detail parts to spruce it up even before reading this thread, but other than the PE sets I was going to get where can i find some AM 20mm's at least. Some of the probs mentioned I can deal with myself (such as the doghouse inaccuracies) and the detail sets should deal with some of the others but those 20mm's are horrendous as you guys mention. Any help for this Rookie Ship modeler would be greatly appreciatedBow [bow]


My first question, how deep are your pockets for this project? Just give me a rough amount and it'll help point you in the right directions.

Second question since you're a treadhead, can you deal with Aber German tool clasps and/or Modelkasten tracks? That will help me tell you what to get and what to avoid. really good 20mm's are about as fiddly if not moreso.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Mansfield, TX
Posted by EdGrune on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 6:43 AM

While Ron checks your credit rating - here is what is probably the top of the line in the replacement detail sets

L'Arsenal's twin 40

L'Arsenal's 5"/38 single

L'Arsenal's Mk37 director.

L'Arsenal also makes quad 40s, 20mm Orelikons, Mk51 directos and other details.   They are likely the best available.  Jacques Druel of L'Arsenal has indicated that he may package a Fletcher refit set.

Toms Modelworks, Gold Medal Models, Flagship Models and Eduard all offer aftermarket PE sets.  The Eduard is for the Tamiya (unless they are bringing a new set) so discard that set.    Of the remaining three, I think I'd recommend the GMM as the most comprehensive.

Tom Harrison of Toms has worked with Trumpeter in the past, and as a result he has gotten early preview samples.  Tom has reworked his old Fletcher set for the Tamiya into some new items for the Trump.   It might not be a bad way to go.

Rusty White of Flagship has not indicated if he is going to update his set.  It is a good set to begin with.

Yankee Modeworks has also indicated that they may be considering a refit package of parts from their resin USS Johnston kit, probably not to include the PE fret.

  • Member since
    April 2004
Posted by pmm736 on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:48 AM
that L'Arsenal stuff looks very nice!  Is there a distributor here in the states?  I went to their website and found it a bit confusing.
  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Mansfield, TX
Posted by EdGrune on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 11:31 AM

 pmm736 wrote:
that L'Arsenal stuff looks very nice!  Is there a distributor here in the states?  I went to their website and found it a bit confusing.

In the States, check Pacific Front Hobbies

http://www.pacificfront.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=38_105

Call Bill Gruner at PacFront instead of trying to email him.   He runs a one man shop and does not answer email as fast (or if ever) as we would like him to.   Otherwise he is a good man to deal with.

Also check White Ensign Models, though they are in the UK.  Purchase with a credit card & let them handle the currency conversion.   Shipping is fast from the UK John Snyder at WEM is good folk and well informed

http://www.whiteensignmodels.com/

  • Member since
    September 2005
  • From: Chehalis, WA
Posted by Fish-Head Aric on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:06 PM
hmmmm, maybe I will go on and build that Lindberg HSM Hood I have been dodging on the modelbox stack after all?
~Aric Fisher aric_001@hotmail.com
  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:34 PM
 EdGrune wrote:

While Ron checks your credit rating - here is what is probably the top of the line in the replacement detail sets

I deliberately asked those two questions to determine what level of fiddliness he is comfortable with and what his budget is. I could easily write up a laundry list of "the best" and quadruple the cost of the kit, that is not my goal. I want to recommend the best bang for the buck at the level he is willing to deal with.

  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Salisbury Massachucetts USA
Posted by PanzerWulff on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:46 PM
 Ron Smith wrote:

My first question, how deep are your pockets for this project? Just give me a rough amount and it'll help point you in the right directions.

Second question since you're a treadhead, can you deal with Aber German tool clasps and/or Modelkasten tracks? That will help me tell you what to get and what to avoid. really good 20mm's are about as fiddly if not moreso.
I am more used tothe indie tracks that come with the DML armor kits but i have used modelkasten tracks on 1of my tigers and a panzerIII based wespe. as for cost I could probably afford to sink an additional $75 or so after the PE set at this time but i am willing to pay more over time as this is to be a Gift to my father BTW I was planning to go with the GMM PE set
ACE??? you were NEVER an ace AN ace HOLE maybe! (Lister to Rimmer on BBC's RED DWARF) Chris"Hey GRAVITY still works"Gray
  • Member since
    April 2004
Posted by pmm736 on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 2:50 PM
 EdGrune wrote:

 pmm736 wrote:
that L'Arsenal stuff looks very nice!  Is there a distributor here in the states?  I went to their website and found it a bit confusing.

In the States, check Pacific Front Hobbies

http://www.pacificfront.com/catalog/index.php?cPath=38_105

Call Bill Gruner at PacFront instead of trying to email him.   He runs a one man shop and does not answer email as fast (or if ever) as we would like him to.   Otherwise he is a good man to deal with.

Also check White Ensign Models, though they are in the UK.  Purchase with a credit card & let them handle the currency conversion.   Shipping is fast from the UK John Snyder at WEM is good folk and well informed

http://www.whiteensignmodels.com/

Ed,  Thanks much for the links.  I've ordered from White Ensign before and they seem to have everything I need.

 

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by Ron Smith on Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:22 PM
 PanzerWulff wrote:
I am more used tothe indie tracks that come with the DML armor kits but i have used modelkasten tracks on 1of my tigers and a panzerIII based wespe. as for cost I could probably afford to sink an additional $75 or so after the PE set at this time but i am willing to pay more over time as this is to be a Gift to my father BTW I was planning to go with the GMM PE set


OK, then the fiddlyness of L'Arsenal 20mm's won't beyond your skills (I really hate recommending things then finding out what's normal for me is beyond the skills of the person I'm trying to help. You can't go wrong with GMM PE, get an extra set of watertight doors and you should have enough of the oval deck hatches for a DD.

If time isn't a concern I'd wait for L'Arsenal's upgrade set since it gives you stacks as well as the armaments.

Otherwise-
L'Arsenal Mk51 directors
L'Arsenal 20 and 40mm's
L'Arsenal, WEM or Corsair Armada 5" turrets
Find a Tamiya kit at a show cheap to steal the torpedo tubes, rafts, boats, stacks and Mk37 directors from
L'Arsenal also makes rafts, floater nets and Mk37 directors
Yankee Modelworks makes useable Mk51, Mk37 and torpedo directors along with torpedo tubes, rafts and boats




  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Salisbury Massachucetts USA
Posted by PanzerWulff on Thursday, June 1, 2006 12:31 AM
Thanks Ron I'm planning to take about a year building the Eaton I'll be sure to post pics of my progress from time to time.And thanks to all you guys for all your helpBig Smile [:D] TTFN
ACE??? you were NEVER an ace AN ace HOLE maybe! (Lister to Rimmer on BBC's RED DWARF) Chris"Hey GRAVITY still works"Gray
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by martinjquinn on Thursday, June 1, 2006 3:18 PM
 Ron Smith wrote:

L'Arsenal, WEM or Corsair Armada 5" turrets


WEM discontinued their turrets, IIRC.  Out of the three you mentioned, the Corsair Armada turrets are the best, with L'Arsenal a very close 2nd.  
Martin
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.