Glamdring wrote: |
No, he is absolutely right. The Bible states the dimensions of the Ark and archeological evidence can show how ships were built back then..... |
|
I'm sure both statements are true. 1. The Bible does state the dimensions of the Ark & 2. Archeological evidence does show how ships were build back then.
I’m not going to argue about each of these facts but unfortunately they rather contradict each other quite a lot.
1. The length of the Ark is stated as being 300 cubits long. During history the length of a cubit has changed significantly but let us suppose that they used the natural cubit which equals 45 cm or 18 inches or 1.5 feet. That gives us a length of 450 feet or 135 meters (other cubits are longer so that would only increase the size of the Ark even more). This size isn’t exaggerated considering the fact that all land animals, including the now extinct ones (like dinosaurs!), would have to be taken onboard the Ark. 450 feet is even a little on the small side then.
2. Archeological evidence about how ships were build back then has been found but is rather scarce which is understandable since the flood is supposed to have happened between 3402 and 2309 B.C. The evidence found does however not show that ships with the size of the Ark were ever built.
Even to this date it just isn’t possible to construct a practical and seaworthy wooden ship with a length of more then 350 feet or 107 meters (even then iron reinforcements and pumps to counter continuous leaking are necessary). The argument that Noah used technology that is unknown to mankind right now is off course a very simple explanation probably made up by people who just don’t have a satisfying answer.
Maybe we should accept that the story about Noah and the Ark is just a myth and nothing more. After all, the whole purpose of the flood was to wipe the wicked people from the face off the earth; did it work? The next flood, if it ever comes, surely is centuries to late….