Can't do it, man. Unless you ask about specific kits.
Each company you list (except Midship, which has produced only two
distinct sets of moldings so far, of roughly similar quality) has
produced a range of quality and a range of accuracy, as well as a range
of "fineness", indicating how thick the edges of the exposed bulkheads,
masts and gunbarrels might be.
In some cases, the range goes from good to great in one measure, but
one of the other two goes from poor to pretty good. And any
individual kit is only a specific data bit on the graph.
So if you crave thin edges and don't have much of an eye for accuracy,
one kit might be your favorite, but another from the same manufacturer
might mot meet the same quality standards. This is ESPECIALLY
true with the latest Trumpeter kits where quality is random - some
great and some not, and Dragon, with a few rubber parts - what's up
with that?
You tilt the scale if you know the age of the kit - many of the oldest
1/700 kits don't stand up to the current standard, even Tamiya's oldest.
Old, original Hasegawa cruiser kits are generally accepted as junk -
the newest Hasegawa cruiser kits from a couple years ago are accepted as the best kts
made. There's no rule you can follow - you have to go kit by kit.
Another measure of "good" is the number of additional features included
in the kit. Can you build it as a different version?
Different rig? different aa suite? etc? Some people
get excited about padding the spares box. With one kit I realized
I was filling my spares box with parts that were too crummy to be used
on future projects. That was a hollow victory...
Aoshima? The oldest were the worst you'll ever encounter, but
along the way, they upgraded a few. nicely. And they reboxed a
few with no improvement at all. You'd better figure out which is
which, because the prices are all increased.
I do love 1/700, but they don't make it easy for us, and the fact that
your question doesn't have an answer is exactly why it is difficult.
Good luck,
Rick