SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Airfix "Royal Sovereign" work in progress pics

11081 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2006
Airfix "Royal Sovereign" work in progress pics
Posted by EPinniger on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:41 AM
Here's my model of the 17th-century British warship "Sovereign of the Seas" (or "Royal Sovereign") built from the 1/168 scale Airfix kit. (Apologies for the LONG post, I wanted to give a brief summary of the kit and the ship it represents for those who are unfamiliar with it - not sure how well known this kit, or the real ship for that matter, is in the US).
The "Sovereign" was built in 1635 and was essentially the first ship-of-the-line, although "line of battle" tactics weren't in use at the time of its construction, In appearance, it has features of both earlier galleons and later ships. In many ways it was the "Dreadnought" of its time, as it was almost twice as large, with twice as many guns, as anything before it, and it provoked an "arms race" among other maritime nations who rapidly built their own equivalents. (The Swedish "Wasa" and French "St. Louis" are examples, I think)
Though it looks improbably ornate for a warship, it actually saw more action than many WW2 ships, serving as the flagship of the Royal Navy from 1637 to 1696 and fighting in several wars (mostly against the Dutch). Its eventual fate was to be accidentally destroyed by fire when in dock for repairs.
I believe it was originally named the "Royal Sovereign" and later renamed "Sovereign of the Seas" but I'm not sure of the date when this name change took place.

The Airfix kit dates from the 1960s and is the largest plastic kit of this ship available. (The Aurora/Pyro/Lindberg kit -recently reissued by Lindberg under the ridiculous label of "Blackbeard Pirate Ship" and briefly reissued by Revell Germany in the 1980s - is about 1/200 to 1/250 I believe) It's definitely not up to the standard of Airfix's best sailing ship kits (such as the Wasa and Prince) but significantly better than the Victory. The hull carvings and ornamentation appear to be rather simplified, but are still fairly "sharp" even in recent reissues of the kit, and look good when painted. The figurehead (intended to represent the Saxon King Edgar on horseback) is very crude, however, partly because it's moulded into the hull in two halves (a seperate single part, as on the Victory kit, would have been a better method). The carved figures at the railing ends are also "flat-backed" - I assume they were three-dimensional carvings on the real ship. Finally, the deck fittings are fairly sparse and probably not as ornate as they should be.
The biggest problem with this kit (recent issues, anyway - a 1960s or 70s-vintage kit would probably be better in this respect) is the flash and mould lines, which are a pain to remove, particularly on the railings and gun carriages. It also has the "stub" gun barrels for all of the lower gun decks, a "feature" common to all the Airfix sailing ships (those that have guns, anyway...)

I haven't attempted to make this model as accurate as possible, firstly as sailing ships are really a secondary modelling interest of mine (my main interests are powered warships from the 19th century to WW2, along with aircraft from WW2 and earlier), and secondly (most importantly) as there is so little reliable information on the real ship. (Though the Sovereign is documented much better than, for example, the average 16th-century galleon from the Armada period, there are only two contemporary drawings of the ship - an oil painting and an engraving - which I believe actually contradict each other in some details).
Hence my modifications and additions will be fairly "generic" and more to improve the appearance of this fairly old kit than to improve its accuracy. I added some basic detail to the (completely featureless) interior sides of the bulwarks and railings. This also hides their thinness a bit. I'll also be adding some figures and additional deck "clutter", possibly some additional deck fittings as well. I modelled all the lower gunports closed as I couldn't face the job of drilling out and sanding all the ports, installing the gun decks, and lengthening all the gun barrels (as I did earlier with the Airfix Victory)!

Anyway, here are a few photos of the model under construction:

Unpainted, showing some of the detail added to the bulwark interiors.


Painting in progress. The deck and lower hull have been painted + drybrushed (the deck needs a lot of retouching) and the gilding on the upper hull is nearly complete. This still needs to be retouched a bit and has not been highlighted or washed yet, so looks fairly "rough" but it gives an idea of the finished ship's appearance. The gold is Revell (acrylic) Gold on a base of Revell matt black. It will be highlighted with Citadel acrylic "Shining Gold".
The hull below the waterline is painted with Revell Stone Grey, giving a dull off-white look which is I believe is fairly close in colour to the wax/tallow-based "white stuff" anti-fouling mixture used on ships of this period (copper plating wasn't introduced until the mid 18th century AFAIK)



Stern gallery. (Some of the painting still needs to be retouched, and an oil wash needs to be added to the carvings). Though the decoration is simplified somewhat on the Airfix kit it still looks impressively intricate and ornate when painted. Windows are painted with "graphite" metallic craft acrylic paint, which gives a more subtle effect than silver.


Guns and carriages. There are actually two different sizes of cannon here, but it's hard to tell the difference (not sure what the exact calibres were). The barrels were cast in bronze. These guns look rather small for a ship of this size, as they're the ones for the spar deck - all the larger guns were on the lower gun decks, to lower the ship's centre of gravity.

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Netherlands
Posted by Grem56 on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 9:03 AM

That is a very nice build so far ! The Revell Stone Grey works well on the underwater ship (have to remember that one). Keep the photos coming when you get to the masts and rigging.

Julian Thumbs Up [tup]

 

illegal immigrants have always been a problem in the United States. Ask any Indian.....................

Italeri S-100: http://cs.finescale.com/FSMCS/forums/t/112607.aspx?PageIndex=1

Isu-152: http://cs.finescale.com/FSMCS/forums/t/116521.aspx?PageIndex=1

 

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:15 AM

Looks nice although I hope you haven't glued the lantern in place yet; it's fitted backwards Wink [;)].

Btw, if you need some inspiration take a look at this model: http://www.old.modelarstwo.org.pl/szkutnicze/galeria/inni/sovereign2/index.html

Bryan
  • Member since
    January 2006
  • From: istanbul/Turkey
Posted by kapudan_emir_effendi on Tuesday, December 19, 2006 6:51 PM
She was known as the "Golden Devil" to the Dutch, who were rightly terrified by this super warship. However, All the existing models are based on the well known payne engraving that show her in 1637 fit. Before she saw any action (in the first Anglo-Dutch war) she was altered. Altough I obtained detailed descriptions of those changes; I did not saw any pictures of her as she appeared during the Cromwellian tyranny era. But, I menaged to find a van de Velde sketch showing her after the great 1660 reconstruction. She emerged clearly a new ship with a totally different taffrail, beakhead and much much lowered bulwarks. she saw most of the action at that configuration. It's pretty impossible to build her in that disguise by using plastic kits; it's better to scratchbuild. I have the old Pyro/Lindberg model of which I'm quite happy. Though the plastic is a little bit thick; the kit possesses wood grain detail (of which the Airfix kit is devoid) and the ornaments are fine for considering the scale (1/250). The only problem are the masts; which are so crude, and the molded sails. These must be built from scratch. There is also the always present ratline problem but this can be well solved by a photoetch set I think.
Don't surrender the ship !
  • Member since
    August 2006
Posted by honneamise on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:35 AM

I have read that the ship was renamed "Royal Sovereign" after its 1660 refit, so I assume all those reconstructions and models of her "as-built"-appearance should be more properly named "Sovereign of the Seas"? 

The model that is featured in the polish link is awesome, it looks perfectly real to me - had I not seen the display case I would have thought it was a full-scale replica! I have never seen better carvings and ornaments. What makes me scratch my head are the gratings that are installed ABOVE some decks - are these meant to be protective covers? I know of the gratings that covered the main deck like on the French St. Louis, but this seems different...      

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: 37deg 40.13' N 95deg 29.10'W
Posted by scottrc on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 7:11 AM

Looks really good with all the gold gilding and I agree, I like the grey.

Scott 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Netherlands
Posted by Grem56 on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 8:43 AM
 honneamise wrote:

What makes me scratch my head are the gratings that are installed ABOVE some decks - are these meant to be protective covers? I know of the gratings that covered the main deck like on the French St. Louis, but this seems different...      

To hazard a guess I would say protection for the guncrews from falling rigging, spars etc. during battle.

Julian

 

illegal immigrants have always been a problem in the United States. Ask any Indian.....................

Italeri S-100: http://cs.finescale.com/FSMCS/forums/t/112607.aspx?PageIndex=1

Isu-152: http://cs.finescale.com/FSMCS/forums/t/116521.aspx?PageIndex=1

 

  • Member since
    January 2006
Posted by EPinniger on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:10 PM
 bryan01 wrote:

Looks nice although I hope you haven't glued the lantern in place yet; it's fitted backwards Wink [;)].

Btw, if you need some inspiration take a look at this model: http://www.old.modelarstwo.org.pl/szkutnicze/galeria/inni/sovereign2/index.html

Thanks for pointing this out - I couldn't figure out which way round the lantern was supposed to go from the kit instructions (they aren't very clear) and it didn't really look right to me either way round, so I chose the way which fitted best - obviously the wrong one! Angry [:(!] (yes, it is glued in place). I'll try and fix this later.

Also thanks for the link - that model really is nothing short of awe-inspiring! It shows how simplified the Airfix kit is.

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: I am at play in the fields of the Lord. (Texas)
Posted by m60a3 on Wednesday, December 20, 2006 8:39 PM

 She's a beauty. Please post more pics when you can.

        60
 

"I lay like a small idea in a vacant mind" - Wm. Least Heat Moon "I am at the center of the earth." - Black Elk My FSM friends are the best.
  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Posted by bryan01 on Thursday, December 21, 2006 3:47 PM

Well EPinninger, I do hope you will find a way to correct the lantern.

In the meantime here are some facts about the Sovereign of the Seas you might find interesting.

She was designed and build at Woolwich shipyard by Phineas Pett (he also build the Royal Prince 1610) who made a lavish model of her - with parts cut away as to show some features inside - which he presented to king Charles I.

The king was greatly impressed and thus in 1634 the ship was ordered very much to the dismay of most of the king's advisors, particularly the "Elder Brethren of Trinity House". This institute deemed the ship to become "a total failure since the design is in many ways too revolutionary. We feel that physically such a large ship can not be build. Her masts will be dangerously high and, because of her size, no port in England will be able to accommodate her. Her anchors and cables will be far too heavy to handle and will not be strong enough to keep her safely moored in bad weather".

Eventually the critics were proven wrong but revolutionary she certainly was.

She was the first true three-decker (102 or 104 guns) ever build and by far the heaviest ship ever constructed in England (and probably the rest of the world).

Her rigging was exceptional as well; she introduced royal masts and sails on the fore and mainmast and a topgallant sail on the mizzen. A second mizzen or Bonaventura-mizzen, until then a common feature for very large ships, was omitted.

Her stern lantern was so large it could easily fit twelve men. Sovereign of the Seas was launched in 1637, at a building cost of £65.568. Of this enormous amount (normally a Man of War would cost £6.500 - the average annual wage in those days was £3) no less then £6981 was spend on decoration.

 

Bryan
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.