Yes, as a matter of fact, I really did like the Albatross Gearing/ Sumner kits. But I stopped holding my breath for the promised Big Five battleships about fifteen years ago.
And, since you served up such an obvious offer for horn-blowing, I will comply and try to provide a link to the photo of the Albatross kit that I took to the IPMS USA Nationals last week, the the kit that placed somewhere lower than third in class - . I built it as USS DeHaven, DD-727.
I've never been able to photograph the critter, due to the dark Navy Blue scheme, but somebody did on the IPMS USA site, and I saved their photo here - thanks!:
I fixed the kit up with a bunch of details, starting by straightening out the stem by adding some sheet plastic and putty, and then replacing weapons, adding railings, cable reels, splinter shields, pe radars, and various other stuff.
My biggest concern for Gearing/Sumner models is below the fwd twin 40mm platforms, where most of the ships have distinctive oval-shaped openings. The JAG resin kit represents these correctly. DeHaven was one of a group that had just three vertical posts there, and that is what I modeled. The third group was wide open. Skywave didn't represent any of the three groups correctly, and that is what I like least about the Skywave Gearing/Sumner kits.
Other folks hold the Skywave deckline against it - instead of having a gracefully curved shear, it is composed of two straight lines, if you look for it. I know that fouled-up shear is there, but it doesn't bother me as much as the side below the 40mm platforms.
As for the Albatross kit, most folks just discount it because it was the first one on the market, and it doesn't have any sharp detail of its own.
There's my $.02 worth, in an area where we all have $.02 or an opinion.
Rick Heinbaugh