Okay, I just decided that I'm going to ditch the plastic container hood and go with the cardboard box. The geometry is just too much better than the plastic tote - no compound curves to deal with, fan installation is practically nothing, and sealing/reinforcing it is a breeze. I weighed out the pros and cons, and tried mock-ups of both, and the cardboard box won hands down in every category. Not only is it extremely simple and cost-effective to build, but it's also more comfortable to use. The only advantage to the plastic tote, again, is the lid, but that's hardly a show-stopper. Heck, simply draping a towel over the box is a workaround. Plus, my room is not very dusty to begin with. With the simple geometry of the box, a decent, filtered lid can be fabricated for a couple bucks worth of materials within minutes
Don, that idea of using an automotive air filter is brilliant. If I ever make another booth, I am probably going to try that. That is an excellent idea
Chris, that's a great source of information, especially regarding how the different draft models work and the effect of static pressure. I actually used that as part of my research into designing my booth. My only contention with Mr. Raddatz' article, and it's actually pretty slight, is that I believe the formula for 100 cfm/sq ft @ the hood opening may be unnecessarily aggressive. I believe the critical point should probably be the plenum opening. After reliable testimony from Mr. Stauffer and others - including the painters at the aircraft company where I work - and the results of my own tests, I've come to believe that 100 cfm/sq ft at the plenum (note: this still includes taking static pressure into account) is adequate to exhaust both particulates and vapors from airbrush spray, and even aerosol cans. I use the terms "probably" and "may" and "I believe" because I am far from an expert on the subject. That is an excellent article, though, and I would advise anyone thinking about designing their own spray booth to check it out