QUOTE: Originally posted by MusicCity
Robert you were one of the guys I was referring to when I said:
QUOTE: some people have very good results with them, and produce some fantastic paint jobs. |
|
and one of the reasons I try and be reserved in my comments about them. If some of the high-power modelers have good results with them they can't be all bad.
|
|
High-power???
Nay! Low-power, low-tech, low-income
To be honest, if I were to find an airbrush that was:
Siphon-feed, Side-loading, MM enamel bottle adaptable, Easy to clean, and Paints one millimeter lines right out of the box...
I probably would have changed long ago...if it cost less than $100.00. I'm just too cheap.
My Aztec does have definite and fairly easy to identify limitations. One of the biggest ones being that it appears that Aztec and acrylics don't seem to get along...particularly if you don't clean the brush and tip
immediately after spraying. When I tried spraying a couple acrylics (on a whim), the results were not favorable! Enamels - at least for me - haven't had any problems. Also, if my modeling genre of choice was 1/72 armor or aircraft, I would need to change airbrushes...period. That's because the Aztec will not deliver small enough detail for subjects in smaller scales. However, for 1/35 armor, 1/32 aircraft, and big Sci-Fi subjects, it works pretty well.
I look at it this way. It's a whole lot better than spray cans, even if it has a problem or two.
Enjoy your modeling...