Tecs wrote: |
Ok I have done the underside of the spit' and am fairly happy, would appriciate some feedback. |
|
I personally disagree with shaded panel lines as being the most realistic representaion of weathering (shading vs non-shading in the aircraft forum is about like Aztek vs. non-Aztek here). That disclaimer aside, your shaded panel lines look to be as effectively done as any that I can recall. Oddly enough, your concerns about not being neat enough is precisely what makes your shading effective. For future improvements, try to be even more random and less neat. The last time there was a debate on shading vs. non-shading in the A/C forum, there was one photo produced which had some shading that sort of followed a number of the panel lines. However it was certainly blotchy and uneven. The shading on some panel lines were fairly dark, others lighter. On some, the width was narrow and others wide. Some panel lines might show no color variation and sometimes the shading woul be in the middle of a panel.
I would suggest on the upper surfaces, go for an even more subtle effect. What I've observed from photos and real life, is that panel lines and any sort of shading, real or perceived, is lot more pronounced on light gray than darker colors. All in all, you should be more thar fairly with Spit thus far.
Andy