A number of factors will most likely apply.
1- Types of materials available for making 3D printed items.
2- Increased resolution capable of producing small , quality items that can compete with resin aftermarket items. 3D printers would need to supplant resin casting as a home hobbyist's primary, economical choice in making multiple copies of model parts.
.
Finally, and most importantly:
3- Will modelers be allowed to own such printers?
The current controversy about drones in civilain ownership is, basically, centered around what someone might do with his drone.
A 3D printer could be used to make a drone.
The armed drone in a video posted on ( You Tube?) was supposed to have been made by the person who mounted the pistol on it. I am not impressed by the video. Predictably, the drone yaws in-flight ; recoil shoves the drone back and down. I would sum it up as a Fail.
Also, a video was posted some years ago of a 3D printed smooth bore zip gun that supposedly fired a small caliber bullet.
Since that time, some politicians have been pushing for a ban on civilian ownership of 3D printers because someone else "might" make a gun.
Dunno about anyone else, but I would NOT trust my life to an explosive charge that is detonated inside a plastic tube.
Discuss.
Dang! wish they'd fix that spell checker.
Have a nice day !
BTW........FWIW, MAKE magazine's Ultimate guide to Desktop Fabrication ; 39 machines tested and Reviewed
is on the news stands now.
A fun read