SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Etch mate PE bender

9235 views
18 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Nashotah, WI
Etch mate PE bender
Posted by Glamdring on Friday, November 4, 2005 10:32 PM
I really want an etch mate, but because I and my family is cheap, $50 is a little expensive. So, is there something out there that folds PE for about $20-$35?

I really want to start working with PE, and I have been told this device is must have.

Robert 

"I can't get ahead no matter how hard I try, I'm gettin' really good at barely gettin' by"

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: San Tan Valley,AZ
Posted by smokinguns3 on Friday, November 4, 2005 10:46 PM
Mr fold it its around 18.99 got mine at hobbytown. its made of pvc plastic 3 inches long i think its a good starter until you can aford somthing bigger.
Rob I think i can I think i can
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Tochigi, Japan
Posted by J-Hulk on Saturday, November 5, 2005 8:22 AM
I can't help you with a cheap PE tool, but I have the Etch-Mate, and it's great.
It makes folding PE very easy and fun! I love it.

I'm sure Alasdair will drop by momentarily to tell me how wrong I am! Wink [;)]Big Smile [:D]
(He endorses the Hold 'n' Fold, another fine PE tool)
~Brian
  • Member since
    January 2004
Posted by Ali1kj on Saturday, November 5, 2005 11:25 AM
Nope,

but why recomend something that the orginal poster has discounted due to price ??

I am sure he has also discounted the Hold&Fold as well on the same basis rather than not wishing to own the latest and finest folding tool on the market :) even if you are happy with your "old-concept" design :)

AJ
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Tochigi, Japan
Posted by J-Hulk on Saturday, November 5, 2005 11:39 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Ali1kj

Nope,

but why recomend something that the orginal poster has discounted due to price ??

I am sure he has also discounted the Hold&Fold as well on the same basis rather than not wishing to own the latest and finest folding tool on the market :) even if you are happy with your "old-concept" design :)

AJ


Alsasdair, you kill me! Smile [:)]

You are absolutely right, though: Glamdring had already decided against the more expensive tools, so I should have kept my mouth shut (or more accurately, hands motionless. Typing, you see.) about the Etch-Mate.

Sorry, Glamdring!

I guess it would have been more appropriate to point out that a decent set of flat pliers, a pair of tweezers, and a razor blade (all can be had for a few dollars) can yield results comparable to the expensive folding tools, albeit not as easily and certainly not as enjoyably.

OK, now here's where I really get it from Alasdair! Wink [;)]
~Brian
  • Member since
    January 2004
Posted by Ali1kj on Saturday, November 5, 2005 7:21 PM
Again Nope....agree with ya mate :)

AJ
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, November 13, 2005 3:24 PM

I am sure he has also discounted the Hold&Fold as well on the same basis rather than not wishing to own the latest and finest folding tool on the market :) even if you are happy with your "old-concept" design :)

Sorry to get in on this one Ali1kj but you would say that seeing as you sell the hold & fold. There are a lot of people that have tried both & the etchmate may be old but still comes out on top. I`m not saying that the hold & fold do not work, just every time this subject comes up your there. I thought this sort of thing was going to be stopped on here. Do you see the makers of etchmate jump in every time hold & fold get a mention! NO.

  • Member since
    January 2004
Posted by Ali1kj on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:20 PM
You see,  I know a little about the subject. But I do NOT compair, I  refer to indapendant sites if you note.  This tell those who have only ever heard of one type of tool about the Whole market, which is an advantage to them. If they chose the most expensive, fine, cheeper, fine as well.  We know that people at times "aspire" to a better tool (car ect) but budget affects us all. Its about choice and whats about.

I always  refer to PMMS etc so PLEASE do not  jump down on me.  But as always some one thinks its unfair..  Pleeeeeease read the posts.

However, please tell me and everybody just why it is better
.   Give us the info
Have you tried the new tools ? , the 5-SPEED ??, the BUG (2 inch)  the 8 inch or even the 14 inch for the railroader...well no I bet you have not.
Now if you would like to tell everybody just why it is better and explain your reasons and show the features that make it "better" please do. EVERYBODY would benifit.
 Personally I would love to see such reviews as they would allow me to improve the tools even more.


 "There are a lot of people that have tried both & the etchmate may be old but still comes out on top"
Can you say this ? , on what basis ?,   please show the reviews that say that.... 
IF you  can I am sure that everybody will learn somthing. Personally I think you will not be able to do such but would love to see you try :) as you would do both of us and the reast of the modelling public a good service.
Please use facts however, not that old "them/us/lets have a fight thing that both MM (John) and SS (me) will never again get into.

Well there is a chalange for you.  Will you take it, money where your text is ??

You say "Stop this"
 If you note, I have never said anything untrue or biased. I also never comment on the other tools whitout talking about them all in "general" then pointing people to reviews who show and know as much or more about the hobby and PE esp.    Terry at PMMS is one such gent.
 I ALWAYs declair my intrest as well.

Upset at the inferance

Alasdair




  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 3:31 PM
To answer your question yes i have tryed the 4inch &  2 inch bug, i was given them by a friend of mine  who lives in linc`s, he got two of them from you at euro 2004 (i believe ) He went & got the etchmate.As i he thought they where ----he was also an engineer of 30 years. So i have tryed them, one thing i would like to ask if the hold & fold are so good why,(if  i am correct ) are you offering replacement bases to those whos have movment on them. Why i have to explain to them out there,they can make their own minds up by visiting reviews& releases under artices at www.ww2modelmaker. Basically most of us that are on this site know 1, what you sell & 2 who you are. If somebody asks were you get a PE folder we can tell them of both of the sites without you pushing the items you sell. P.s i would not use hold & fold as i find the etchmate better & cleaner folds due i think to the grove on the eatchmate & find that it holds the PE better.
  • Member since
    January 2004
Posted by Ali1kj on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 5:14 PM
 I am please you have used them..

On the replacements   out of OVER 14000 units in the EU (where I represent the HOLD & FOLD) I have replaced 4 bases and 6 tool heads in 4 years....that is good for me. Never a quibble and never a problem.   And I think even you would say that's a fantastic record.  As for movement, without a grove, who cares ??  You fold the metal against the edge of the tool head  NOT the base. In truth, if it were not for the unique need for us modellers to use the outside edges of our folding tools, there would be no need for giude dowels either, the base is just to leaver against. Unless you stick on a grove, I cover why we do not below.
All PE alinemend and presure/folding lines are to/against the head edges and those forces we know need to be horizontal. If they are you can have finer edges and thus tighter folds. We TOTALLY dispute that the grove gives tighter folds. This has been dis-proved many times. Please correct your pricipels of metal folding here.

The BUG was launched at LAST years Trucks&Tracks show, you have seen the old 2inch MICRO ?, which is not the same as the BUG and is an old design , as old as the 4 inch, the EM came out just after the old "extended-head" design.  Please get your facts correct on  our products..
The BUG is a massive improvement with major a redesign to the way it works, shape and rotating head and other  features. A totally new tool.

The 4 inch tool was replaced at the beginning of THIS year by the 5-Speed, a TWIN clamp tool...again the biggest improvement is the head design...so please compare like with like.
An upgraded 4 inch tool is still made in the USA, basicly thinner edges and a rotating head unit that gets rid of the need to remove the head from the base to use the long egde on the inside. Esp usefull for the ship guys with thier mad masts !! :)

On the folding grove, as your friend is an engineer he should be able to follow the basic principles of his profession. Folding metal with "bending breaks" is an art in itself which goes back many many many years. The Hold & Fold and all the clones out there are all following that orginal principal.
Pete Forrest (USA) the H&F "inventor", has stated this many times. Remember nothing is new, not even in modelling :).
 The reason we do not and never will apply a grove is as below. The basics are as old as sheet metal itself. As is the design basics of all folding tools on the market. Ever wondered why all the other tools have not coppied the grove ??. Sure it works for light etch, but try it on heavey railroad etch and you will understand. The basics tell us that it is horizontal pressure that folds tigntly, not leaverage.

from here
http://www.precipice.co.uk/article1.html
We also belive that the folding grove limmits the design function. You cannot move the tool head back to widen the working bed. There are 4 positions on the hold and fold, two on clone designs.

Note this review was based on the old  8 inch twin clamp, the twin clamp design was used for the New 5-Speed, however ALL tools now have the new micro edges for even tighter folds and better stress transfer as well..

ALL single clamp tools are "weak at the edge", There is a massive drop off in the clamp force with
any single clamp tool at the outer edges. This is physics and cannot be improved on without extra down force which would damage the tool by bending. Also fingers could nor tighten it that much.  We have moved to twin clamps for these reasons. 

The twin clamp tools  work better in the hand as well, you hold it with your fingers between the clamps and operate the sprung head with you thumb...dead easy . Both the 4 inch H&F and the "other" single clamp (4 to 6inch wide tools) have clamps screws in the centre which makes hand holding less easy than the twin clamp design. You cannot get around that either, so we did the twin design.

ALL single clamp tools suffer from the head plate guide dowels blocking larger parts from passing between these. Hence twin clamps and no screw or dowels in the way.  A Big + for 1/16th Aber Tiger sets and other large scale stuff. As well as  Ship rails and masts, railway etc. etc.

We believe this is a basic formula, we regard it as such. MM do it their way, we do it ours.

All tools made in the UK(EU) have etch bending beams, some have the new pre formers as well ( 5-Spped and 8 inch MkRv2).  These to do Aber German clamps, Head Lamp guards ect. These features are NOT found on ANY other tools on the market today and are another inovation found on our tools. Again the Small Shop invents, again I am sure others will follow and we will need to make better tools all over again :)  That said without the "clones" we would not of been drive to improve...so bring it on :)

On the  ME thing
Basically most of us that are on this site know 1, what you sell & 2 who you are.
I do NOT hide who I am , as you say all the members know me, please do not even infer what you are trying to infer.

Hope this covers the reasons we design the way we do and is informative to the other members.

BTW, I think you know,  I am personal friend with the guy at WW2MM, I do not refer people on this forum to another forum.  I generally refer to the PMMS site which is run by the most respected of reviews. Mr Terry Ashley. I remind you that ALL tools are covered there and in some depth.
PMMS site
http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/reviews/misc/tools.htm

Choice is choice, info is info, let the buyer choose based on full info and not massive marketing and massive adverts alone :)...BUT remember, the world IS FULL of Hold & Fold clones, we just improve them more often than the others.

All the best, and if your at the IPMS Nats, come over and see the new tools, you will be most welcome, honestly, we are modellers after all.

Alasdair
Small Shop EU
(On this post as its about our products)....normally Ali1kj....when I post models etc.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 8:15 PM

Yoda wrote the following post at 11-15-2005 9:31 PM:

" like to ask if the hold & fold are so good why,(if  i am correct ) are you offering replacement bases to those whos have movment on them."


All Hold-N-Fold units manufactured and sold by our company in the US (and any overseas markets excepting territory belonging to the Small Shop EU ) are shipped fully assembled *and* tested.

In June 2003, our company (Kalama Precision Machine) took over the manufacture and distribution of Small Shop (USA) products. Since that time, we've had exactly one unit returned for replacement...and absolutely no requests whatsoever for base replacment.

However :

*If* anyone is currently having any problems at all with any Hold-N-Fold product, we would encourage them to contact us directly through the Small Shop website.


Cheers,

--Sam & Julie Lockwood

The Small Shop (USA)


  • Member since
    October 2011
Posted by mrscout on Thursday, February 23, 2012 10:23 AM

New post to an old thread - BUT - one of the best responses I have read and informative on PE Benders.  Why just now? Just now looking for a bender and doiing research.

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Adelaide, Australia
Posted by zapme on Sunday, February 26, 2012 1:32 AM

Glamdring,

 

I use the "BUG". It fits in the hand of your palm, and if you don't do large photo etch it is perfect. I recon it cost me around $30. Highly recommended and top US quality also.

Cheers - Leo

 

My Blog - leoslatestbuilds.blogspot.com

On the workbench: 1/72 Airfix De Havilland DH88 Comet , 1/35 Trumpeter M1A1, 1/35 Tamiya Tyrannosaurus Rex, 1/8 (?) vinyl C3PO brand unknown

 

  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Calgary
Posted by MaxPower on Friday, March 2, 2012 10:15 AM

Edit: Just noticed this thread is a gravedig. Deleted my response. I wondered how a thread had 13 replies and more than 1600 views!!

  • Member since
    July 2010
  • From: Harlan, Kentucky, U.S.A.
Posted by robtmelvin on Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:02 PM

I have no experiece with either The Bug or the Hold-n-Fold, but I do have the Etch Mate 3C and find that it is worth every penny of its cost.  It handles longer pieces of PE very nicely and the groove helps with getting a  straight bend.  I can't make any comparisons based on my personal experience, but I can personally recommend the EtchMate as worth the cost.

Bob

Just launched:  Revell 1/249 U.S.S. Buckley w/ after market PE and guns.

Building: Italieri 1/35 P.T. 596 w/ Lion Roar PE.

  • Member since
    April 2009
  • From: Longmont, Colorado
Posted by Cadet Chuck on Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:19 PM

About four years ago, I bought a product from The Small Shop / Kalama Precision Machine- ref the post from Sam earlier.

I bought the 2" Mk II RTH Hold & Fold and can recommend it as a highly precision and well made product.  It's small, but versatile enough that I have been able to do any PE work that I have needed for aircraft models over the last four years.  I picked it up for $27 from a dealer at a toy train show, don't know what their current price is.

Now, if you are planning on bending long pieces like ship rails, etc, you would need a much larger model.

 

Gimme a pigfoot, and a bottle of beer...

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Maryland
Posted by usmc1371 on Sunday, March 18, 2012 8:37 AM

Anyone ever seen this one:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Professional-Tiger-model-Etch-Partner-Photo-Etched-Fixture-Tool-TOP-Item-/300679364009?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item4601e2fda9#ht_5078wt_1163

I wonder if it's any good.

It's inexpensive but made in China, so make your own assumptions.

-Jesse

  • Member since
    June 2012
  • From: Kidderminster, U.K.
Posted by Jockster on Thursday, July 12, 2012 1:51 PM

To Glamdring and usmc1371, that is the one I have, it feels well made and does the job just nicely, the top plate can be rotated 180 degrees and I bought it until I could afford something better, except I think I will stick with this. Glamdring, before buying this, I used a steel rule and single edged razor blade, and still do along with the etch-partner. hope this helps guys!

On the bench-1/350 Zvezda Varyag, Trumpeter Slava class Varyag and Tamiya CVN65 Enterprise. 1/400 Academy Titanic and 1/96 DeAgostini Victory.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2012
Posted by TBadger on Monday, August 6, 2012 8:50 AM

I use the Small Shop's BUG RTH folder.  It was about 45 shipped direct from their site, couldnt be more pleased with it.  I suggest getting their cutting assistant made of Plexi too, as it helps cut the frets without jumping your parts into the carpet monster

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.