SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

To the camera experts in the house!

837 views
2 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: BOONEVILLE, MISSISSIPPI
To the camera experts in the house!
Posted by ipms40049 on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 12:50 AM
Does anyone know what the difference is between a regular digital camera and a digital SLR is?

Well kinda have two questions here. The second is that my wife is looking to get me the NIKON  D50 package kit for xmas, and I was wondering if anyone maybe knew about how this one is?

Pat Hensley Booneville, Ms "Thank you for being here and playing nice"...please do not drag sand outside the box ! CURRENT BUILD(s) Revell 1/72 U Boat VII C Tamiya Willys Jeep - for 2010 Nats Bronco's Staghound -for 2010 Nats Dragons M16 Multi gun carriage - for the 2020 Nats. LOL
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Piscataway, NJ!
Posted by wing_nut on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 5:29 AM
An SLR, single lens reflex, camera of any king, digital or not, is one that has a prism/miroor system that sends the light from the lens up to the viewfinder so when you look through your are seeing what the camera sees.

Marc  

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Central Iowa
Posted by wm_brant on Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:40 PM
The SLR is quite a bit more versitile and expensive than a 'point and shoot' style of camera.

Some of the advantages-- which you may or may not value -- of an SLR include:
  • Interchangeable lenses.  You can get specialized 'macro' lenses for extreme closeups, or wide angle lenses, or telephoto lenses.  These lenses can have quite a bit better resolution than a point and shoot's lens.  The SLR lenses usually are 'faster' -- meaning that they let in more light; you won't need to use flash quite as much.  This also allows you more control of 'depth of field' -- the part of the picture in focus.  You can go for having everything in focus, or only part of the subject in focus.
  • More flash options.  Many digital SLRs have a point-and-shoot type flash built in.  You can also use off camera flash, bounce flash, shoot through an umbrella (softer light and shadows), use multiple flash, etc.  The seperate flashes are also a lot more powerful than the ones on point and shoot cameras, giving you more 'range' on your flash shots..  Point and shoots have just a single weak flash pretty close to the lens which usually results in a red-eyed, pasty-skinned flat picture (if people) or glaring 'hot spots' if taking pictures of something like a model.
  • You can keep your investment in lenses when you 'trade-up' bodies. 
  • Better located, sized, and shaped controls, and better access to the controls the camera offers.   Controls on a point and shoot have to be small in size, limited in number, etc.  That means that you might have to hunt around on a point and shoot to find a control that is just a button press away on a SLR.
  • Usually better, faster auto-focus
  • Smaller delays between shots
  • Higher resolution sensors
Downsides of an SLR include:
  • More expensive
  • More complex
  • Larger
Bottom line -- if you are *serious* about photography, you should consider a SLR.  If you just want to get the picture and not have to futz with a lot of things, buy a point and shoot.  I own and use both.

Recommendation -- if you're seriously looking at taking pictures of your work that show your model to the best advantage, an SLR is the best way to go.  But you will spend more.  And since there are a lot of accessories for SLRs, you will find more things to spend money on.  Believe me, I know.

  -- Bill
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.