SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728382 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:42 PM

Thanks- I'll give it a try. Please let me know if this is too obscure-but this aircraft is a personal favorite of mine...

IT is a between wars ( late 1920's / early 30's ) british fighter prototype that flew  at a US air race, of which six total were made of the three different versions and finally fought ( I think 3 planes in all )  with the Chinese air force against the Japanese during that lengthy conflict.

 

Good luck all, Keith

This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Friday, January 12, 2007 10:13 AM

According to my sources, the only *British*...

Go to fullsize image

 fighter type to serve with the Chinese Air Force between 1937 and 1945 was the "Gloster Gladiator Mk.I"

  Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Friday, January 12, 2007 7:05 PM

Absolutely true for production fighters , but this was a series of prototype aircraft and a generation "younger" so to speak. 6 aircraft produced only- of three different "series" - and performed at the Chicago air races one year as an acrobatic exhibition aircraft...

It is indeed a toughie... feel free to skip right by this one and keep the room moving along...

Cheers, Keith

This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:22 AM
 hudskit wrote:

Absolutely true for production fighters , but this was a series of prototype aircraft and a generation "younger" so to speak. 6 aircraft produced only- of three different "series" - and performed at the Chicago air races one year as an acrobatic exhibition aircraft...

It is indeed a toughie... feel free to skip right by this one and keep the room moving along...

Cheers, Keith

If you want us to skip this one, I would apperciate knowing which aircraft you had in mind anyway.

On the other hand, you can answer the question yourself if we can't without loosing your turn, and "switch the question" to one that might be more conventional if you wish.

Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 5:56 PM

Sure thing- the aircraft I had in mind was the Blackburn Lincock- a small single bay biplane fighter that while very nimble and very manuverable but simply wasn't quite "good" enough for production. A single demonstrator aircraft was flown at the chicago air races one year (perhaps 1928?) with a very sexy set of single helmets over each individual radial cylinder. I believe 3 of the other series demonstrators were purchased by the Chinese for use against the Japanese- but being a fairly "hot" aircraft they were wrecked instead by their chinese pilots.

On a more conventional note- what aircraft was purchased by the chinese govt for General Claire Chennault as a personal aircraft?

This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:03 PM
He had a Curtiss P-36

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:07 AM

Close enough to be a winner! He was presented with a curtiss H-75H- which was a very simplified version of the export series hawk H-75- utilizing fixed landing gear and a single row (in-house) wright cyclone radial instead of the US army specified Pratt/whitney twin wasp.

Another correct answer would have been the Boeing Model 100- an export version of the P-12B- that he alledgedly used to shoot down 7 or so japanese aircraft over Nanking before it was rendered unservicable due to a lack of spares.

The baton passes on...

Regards to all,

Keith

This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 10:40 AM
 hudskit wrote:

Sure thing- the aircraft I had in mind was the Blackburn Lincock- a small single bay biplane fighter that while very nimble and very manuverable but simply wasn't quite "good" enough for production. A single demonstrator aircraft was flown at the chicago air races one year (perhaps 1928?) with a very sexy set of single helmets over each individual radial cylinder. I believe 3 of the other series demonstrators were purchased by the Chinese for use against the Japanese- but being a fairly "hot" aircraft they were wrecked instead by their chinese pilots.

Thank you for sharing-that is a funny story Laugh [(-D]

  Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:39 PM

Thanks for cutting me some slack on the Chennault question, Hudskit!

 The next question then is:

 

There were two attempts at escorts for 8th Air Force bombers that did not work out though some of one of these types of aircraft did fly some missions.  Name both aircraft by their proper designations and why they failed to meet the requirement.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:56 PM

Was one of them B-24s converted into a seriously mean looking machine, which I believe flew a missions?

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 5:58 PM

 jeaton01 wrote:

There were two attempts at escorts for 8th Air Force bombers that did not work out though some of one of these types of aircraft did fly some missions.  Name both aircraft by their proper designations and why they failed to meet the requirement.

Not sure I completely understand the question.  Initially, the 8th AF had Spitfires (4th FG) and P-38s.  The turbos on the P-38 did not do well in cold and damp conditions.  It could handle hot and damp or cold and dry, but cold and damp caused the oil in the turbos to jellify.  The P-38s had the range to escort the heavies, but too many mechanical problems.

 The Spitfire didn't have the range of course.  RAF Spitfires did often cover the heavies on the first leg outbound and last leg inbound.

The P-47 was the first good escort fighter the 8th had.  It had better range than the Spitfire, but not enough to escort the bombers all the way to target deep in Germany.  As far as they could go, they were very effective.  The 56th FG ended up the top scoring FG and was the only 8th AF group not to convert to P-51s by the end of the war.

Those are the only escort fighters I can think of before the P-51 came along.  There may have been something more obscure, but I've never heard of it.

 Bill

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 6:01 PM
 osher wrote:

Was one of them B-24s converted into a seriously mean looking machine, which I believe flew a missions?

 I don't know about a heavily armed B-24, but there was the XB-40, which was a heavily armed B-17.  I forgot about that one.  It was too heavy and couldn't keep up with the bomber stream.  One feature from it was retained, which was the chin turret which ended up on the B-17G.

 Bill

  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 7:23 PM

I believe the XB-40 was actually used operationally in the Med at least once- if I recollect correctly when the drawback of it's reduced speed was discovered it was then used to "hunt" ex-Allied aircraft being used by the italians to shadow bomber streams (specifically at least one P-38 ) by posing as a "straggler" on the return flight. I don't believe it was ever used operationally by the 8Th airforce in the ETO.

Cheers, Keith

 

This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:26 PM
XB-40 by Lockheed-Vega was actually used by the 8th AF on a few missions. However, they stopped using them after a few missions- they couldn'tkeep up with the bombers on the home leg.
''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:39 AM
Everyone is going the right direction.  The YB-40 was used by the 8th AF in Europe, and the reason it failed was that it couldn't keep up with the bombers once they had dropped the bombs, and was then not able to defend itself against fighter attack once it became a "straggler" on the way home.  The other aircraft was not used operationally but it was built and tested.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:40 AM

 jeaton01 wrote:
Everyone is going the right direction.  The YB-40 was used by the 8th AF in Europe, and the reason it failed was that it couldn't keep up with the bombers once they had dropped the bombs, and was then not able to defend itself against fighter attack once it became a "straggler" on the way home.  The other aircraft was not used operationally but it was built and tested.

I think osher brushed on one which was the XB-41,a one-off that was a long-range escort version of the B-24D Liberator. It was designed to fill a similar requirement as was the Boeing YB-40, namely, to provide escort for bombers penetrating German airspace.

Wouldn't that qualify as one?

Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Tacoma, WA
Posted by Jaypack55 on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:03 PM
Darn tom, you beat me to it!

-Josh

Current Builds: If I were to list everything I have in progress, it'd take way too long! Some notable inclusions:

Hasegawa 1:48 KI-84

Tamiya 1:48 P-51D (in Iwo Jima long-range escort markings)

4 (yes, four) Tamiya 1:48 F4U-1s (1x -1D, 1x -1A, and 2x -1s)

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:13 PM

Tom is the big winner!  My reference is Lloyd Jones's "U S Bombers".  The XB-41 never got past one prototype, modified from B-24D 41-11822. 

Over to you, Tom.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:28 PM

Well, OK, sort of along these same lines:

Which U.S. Navy patrol plane produced the most gunnery aces with air-to-air shoot downs of WWII in the Pacific Theater of operation?

Hint:

The correct answer involves a varient of a recently above mentioned aircraft.

Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Tacoma, WA
Posted by Jaypack55 on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:48 PM
I'd have to guess either the PB4Y-1 (liberator) or -2 (Privateer)

-Josh

Current Builds: If I were to list everything I have in progress, it'd take way too long! Some notable inclusions:

Hasegawa 1:48 KI-84

Tamiya 1:48 P-51D (in Iwo Jima long-range escort markings)

4 (yes, four) Tamiya 1:48 F4U-1s (1x -1D, 1x -1A, and 2x -1s)

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Thursday, January 18, 2007 3:41 PM

 Jaypack55 wrote:
I'd have to guess either the PB4Y-1 (liberator) or -2 (Privateer)

You got it JaypackThumbs Up [tup]

You go next!

Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Southern Oregon, USA
Posted by gedenke on Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:05 PM

Go figure! One question I actually knew and Jaypack beat me to it!

-Geoff There is an art . . . to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. — Douglas Adams, 'The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy'.
  • Member since
    October 2005
  • From: Tacoma, WA
Posted by Jaypack55 on Friday, January 19, 2007 10:14 PM

Okay, here's my question:

What was the most-produced series of fighter aircraft in history?

Here's a hint: it was in WWII, towards the right.

-Josh

Current Builds: If I were to list everything I have in progress, it'd take way too long! Some notable inclusions:

Hasegawa 1:48 KI-84

Tamiya 1:48 P-51D (in Iwo Jima long-range escort markings)

4 (yes, four) Tamiya 1:48 F4U-1s (1x -1D, 1x -1A, and 2x -1s)

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Friday, January 19, 2007 10:20 PM
 Jaypack55 wrote:

Okay, here's my question:

What was the most-produced series of fighter aircraft in history?

Here's a hint: it was in WWII, towards the right.

 Towards the right?  Not quite sure what you mean by that.  I believe the Me-109 was the most produced.  By series, do you mean something like the Yak series?

Bill 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Reno, NV
Posted by espins1 on Friday, January 19, 2007 10:24 PM
 Jaypack55 wrote:

Okay, here's my question:

What was the most-produced series of fighter aircraft in history?

Here's a hint: it was in WWII, towards the right.

Bf109 Whistling [:-^]

Scott Espin - IPMS Reno High Rollers  Geeked My Reviews 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Saturday, January 20, 2007 2:46 AM
To the right on the map, to the right of the Urals, even.  The Stormovik, memory says in excess of 38,000.  The Me-109 was up to almost that high a number, around 35,000, again from memory.

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Reno, NV
Posted by espins1 on Saturday, January 20, 2007 12:26 PM
I checked the production figures.  Over 31,000 Bf109 aircraft were produced, but over 36,000 IL-2 Sturmoviks were produced, and the improved version of the IL-2 was the IL-10, and over 6,000 of those were produced for a whopping total of 42,000!  Shock [:O] Wow!! [wow]

Scott Espin - IPMS Reno High Rollers  Geeked My Reviews 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Saturday, January 20, 2007 7:21 PM
I reread the question, and Jaypack did say fighter, which would make the 109 the candidate since the Stormovik was a ground attack aircraft. 

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Saturday, January 20, 2007 8:07 PM

It appears that he's looking for a Russian fighter, and he did says series.  The Yak is the biggest series I can think of.  Yak 1-9 were all similar airframes with progressively better equipment.

 Bill

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Saturday, January 20, 2007 11:25 PM
 wdolson2 wrote:

It appears that he's looking for a Russian fighter, and he did says series.  The Yak is the biggest series I can think of.  Yak 1-9 were all similar airframes with progressively better equipment.

 Bill

I think you may have it, Bill.

Yak-1    8,700

Yak-3    4,848

Yak-7    6,339

Yak-9   16,769

Total    36,656

Yak-11   4,566

Total:   41,222

 

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.