SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 7:58 AM

Most people know the Vulcan that bombed Port Stanley, in 1982, and cheered on the crews bravery.  However, a fellow aircrew had an experience possibly as traumatic, if not worse, during the same 'Blackbuck' mission.  What was the aircraft, what was the almost fatal decision they made, what saved them.  For 2 more related questions (just for fun):

What vital lack of equipment meant that the possibly superior American aircraft not be used (i.e. what was missing), for the mission of the second aircraft?

What was the ditty the American pilots had about the airport they used?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 3:21 PM
The Victor tanker was used, as it could be refueled itself in flight. One of the last two Victors flew beyond their return bracket while flying to meet the returning bomber, and had to be refueled themselves in order to return.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 4:14 PM

Excellent answer Bondoman! The crew of the last Victor tanker took a decision to follow the Vulcan to the Falklands, as per the plan, even though they has short fuelled, meaning that they were likely to run out of fuel and dive into the sea.  At least the bestseller Vulcan 607 rectified the situation.  17 aircraft to enable one Vulcan to drop some bombs on Port Stanley.

The KC-135 did not (does not?) have the ability to refuel itself, so, whilst it's range was longer, it couldn't make to from Ascension Island to the Falkland Islands, and back...

Thankfully someone had the foresight to send up a Victor tanker to look for the last Victor, just in case...

Anyway, all yours Bondoman!

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 8:30 PM
 osher wrote:

What was the ditty the American pilots had about the airport they used?

???

Don't keep us in suspenders any longer, please!

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 10:25 PM

Thanks, that was an amazing mission. What was the song, something about "Wideawake" for the "Ascencion"?

Question:

So, what major multi-engined attack warplane had Britain negotiated to sell to Argentina prior to the conflict, and the Canberra doesn't count.

And for extra because it's OT, what was the original name of the ship that figured in that war with the largest loss of life?

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 11:16 PM

I'm guessing that the plane would be the Tornado.

Shame on me for forgetting the name of the ship. Sir Galahad, was it? or Atlantic Conveyor?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 2, 2008 11:48 PM

no, and no.

It is interesting how the Argentine Regime was on a weapons buying spree for years and years. They even had a Sheffield class destroyer on order, and paid for, which Britain quietly laid claim to following the loss of her namesake.

 

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 3, 2008 12:12 AM

The ship would have been the Argentine navy light cruiser General Belgrano, which was hit by two Mk.8 torpedos from the British SSN HMS Conqueror, in the only known instance of a SSN firing a torpedo in anger. She started life as CL-46 USS Phoenix, launched at the New York Shipbuilding Corporation in March 1938.

When the ship went down, she took 321 crew and two civilian contractors with her.

Other ships to be sunk in the Falklands war were:

ARA Santa Fe (one casualty)

HMS Sheffield (20 casualties)

HMS Coventry (19 casualties)

HMS Antelope (2 casualties)

HMS Ardent (22 casualties)

RFA Sir Galahad (48 casualties, mosty members of the Welsh Guards)

MV Atlantic Conveyor (12 casualties, including her captain).

As to British warplane sales to Argentina scuppered by the Falklands conflict - well, there weren't that many British (as opposed to Multi-national with British involvement) multi-engined combat aircraft programmes in the late 1970s/ early 1980s. We actaully did sell them some Lynx helos, for use on their Type 42 destroyers - were we planning to sell them Nimrods?

Cheers,

Chris.

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 3, 2008 12:39 AM

Chris, you are correct about the Phoenix. She and a sister the Boise, CL-47 6" gun cruisers, were sold to Argentina in 1951, the Boise being scrapped prior to the Falklands War.

Like the soldiers who died on the Galahad, and the Tristam, I find the sinking of the Belgrano particularly sad insofar as a cruiser with a complement of 1000 or so has of course all kinds of ratings who lost their lives in every kind of circumstance, cook to captain.

Not the Nimrod, but I'll add this: I'll accept any answer so long as you have a creditable reference, then give you mine.

Bill

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Thursday, April 3, 2008 2:51 AM

Again - and this is another guess, more by a process of elimination than anything else - the SEPECAT Jaguar?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, April 3, 2008 2:53 PM
... and if not the Jaguar, then the Buccaneer?
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 3, 2008 5:35 PM
No and no. A hint- four jet engines.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Thursday, April 3, 2008 5:42 PM
Victors?
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Thursday, April 3, 2008 5:47 PM

Oh geeze...

Bondoman, what was the question?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 3, 2008 7:20 PM
 trexx wrote:

Oh geeze...

Bondoman, what was the question?

Question:

So, what major multi-engined attack warplane had Britain negotiated to sell to Argentina prior to the conflict, and the Canberra doesn't count.

No to Victor, but you are getting closer.

Hint no. 2 and this'll make it easy- it was outdated in 1982.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Thursday, April 3, 2008 7:31 PM

The Shackelton?

Great question, I'm stumped!

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, April 3, 2008 8:50 PM
If none of the above, Vulcans?
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Thursday, April 3, 2008 8:56 PM
 bondoman wrote:
 trexx wrote:

Oh geeze...

Bondoman, what was the question?

Question:

So, what major multi-engined attack warplane had Britain negotiated to sell to Argentina prior to the conflict, and the Canberra doesn't count.

No to Victor, but you are getting closer.

Hint no. 2 and this'll make it easy- it was outdated in 1982.

Thanks. But I haven't a clue!

Hmmm... Four engined jet 'attack' aircraft?  I don't have anything but wild guesses!

The Shackleton is not a jet... had Griffons...

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Thursday, April 3, 2008 10:15 PM

 Brews wrote:
If none of the above, Vulcans?
Warbird Tech Series, Volume 26, "Royal Air Force Avro Vulcan", page 89, in part:

"The final irony that caps the events in the South Atlantic was that a delegation from the Fuerza Aerea Argentina had visited the UK early in 1982 to discuss purchase of a quantity of redundant Vulcans plus a substantial spares package. In light of the invasion of the Falklands, the possible sale of redundant members of the Vulcan fleet to Argentina was hastily dropped."

I'm still curious about the song though?

Nicely done, Brews, and on to you. I'd like to see a Falklands/ Malvinas GB. There's a couple of active forum members from Argentina who have interesting projects, it'd be nice to do a "both sides" GB, I think (?).

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Friday, April 4, 2008 5:44 AM
 trexx wrote:

The Shackleton is not a jet... had Griffons...

 Technically no, but some marks did have booster engines attached to improve takeoff and climb performance. Didn't work to well, though, they wore out the airframes. 

Unfortunately it only had two jet engines and the Argies weren't interested in purchasing it. Sigh [sigh]

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, April 4, 2008 2:49 PM
Apparrently, the fuel tank of the Vulcan was a good hiding place for Mechanics skiving off. I have it on good authority that one Vulcan at least took off with a card table still inside the wing.
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, April 5, 2008 9:49 AM

With the recent passing of Sir Edmund Hillary, it is appropriate to ask this easy question:

What was the first plane to fly over Mt Everest, who was the pilot, and who makes the best 1:72 kit of the machine?

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, April 5, 2008 10:45 AM

That would be a modified Westland Wallace prototype, G-ACBR, flown by Flight Lieutenant D.F. McIntyre, 75 years ago yesteday. The only 1/72 kit of this aircraft of which I'm aware is the FROG/ FROGspawn kit, which I recall building in the early 1960s. It came with six FROG free gift Gold Tokens....Smile [:)]

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, April 5, 2008 11:25 AM

The penalty for answering so rapidly and correctly, with additional information regarding the anniversary, is that you must now build one within a month.

All yours, maestro.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, April 5, 2008 1:58 PM
 Brews wrote:

The penalty for answering so rapidly and correctly, with additional information regarding the anniversary, is that you must now build one within a month.

Well, there's on on eBay at the moment with just over a day to go, no bids at $US5.99 (plus $US13.00 p&p)....am I tempted? Nah - it's Heller Victory time of year again!

Anyway - what's special about this Tupolev Bear:

and in what important, and safety-critical, way did it differ from its US equivalent?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Saturday, April 5, 2008 3:06 PM
It was different because it's crews "glowed" with pride after each and every flight. Must have been a helluva ride!
''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, April 5, 2008 3:16 PM

Quite so. Apparently, some of their early SSNs and SSGNs suffered from similar problems. Or rather, their crews did. Thumbs Down [tdn]

Your turn, Matt!

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Saturday, April 5, 2008 4:54 PM

:)

 For everyone that didn't know, the airplane in question is a TU-119, also known as the "Nuclear Bear." It was built in response to the NB-36 program in the U.S., only the Russians didn't invest in radiactive shielding like we did so the crews that flew this plane ended up getting blasted with lethal amounts of radiation. Few survived into the 1990's.

Hmm....my turn, eh? This should be an easy one.

What WWII U.S. unit of the C.A.P. successfully sank a U-boat in the Atlantic during WWII, what type of airplane were they flying, and why was it unusual?

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, April 5, 2008 5:03 PM
That's not the Catalina that sunk a u-boot, with a joint British/American crew, but was credited to the British, as the Americans were supposed to just be observers?  (or something like that)
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Saturday, April 5, 2008 5:48 PM

Na, sorry.

 I made a slight mistake in the question, as the CAP sunk two U-boats during the war. The question applies to the first. Please don't use Google to directly search that, though.

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.