SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728382 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    December 2005
Posted by hudskit on Sunday, November 4, 2007 5:49 PM
Bucker 181 Bestmann?
This whole workin' for a living thing does get in the way of so many things....
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Sunday, November 4, 2007 12:39 PM

I know I said I knew jack about trainers, which I dont, but this thread is starting to get the better of me - would this be an Avia aircraft of some sort?

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Saturday, November 3, 2007 6:15 PM
. . . used in the Olympics
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Saturday, November 3, 2007 9:12 AM
nope, nope and nope. It is not an American aircraft. Remember the part about the founder and his prior company existing today. This aircraft was built under license after the war. As mentioned in the first question, it's earlier brethren was renouned as a star aerobatic mount . . .
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, November 2, 2007 11:40 PM
It's the Vultee BT-13.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, November 2, 2007 9:59 PM

NIX that last one. i'm going to say the PT-19

 

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, November 2, 2007 9:55 PM
  T-6 Texan/SNJ/Harvard???
40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Friday, November 2, 2007 8:43 PM

this was one of the most widely used primary trainers. later on built under license by several other firms.

 Milairjunkie wrote:

Sorry, what I know about trainers is - nothing.

I have had a look & found some Ryan, Fairchild, Fiat, Saab & Bucker examples, but none seem to tie in, & as mentioned my knowledge here is again - nothing. 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, November 1, 2007 6:21 PM

Sorry, what I know about trainers is - nothing.

I have had a look & found some Ryan, Fairchild, Fiat, Saab & Bucker examples, but none seem to tie in, & as mentioned my knowledge here is again - nothing. 

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Thursday, November 1, 2007 5:11 PM

Okay.

This WWII primary trainer was first flown in 1939. It was a low wing monoplane. It was quite aerobatic, and one of its older brethren was well known as quite the aerobatic performer. Many are still flying today. The founder of the company that designed/built it also founded a company that is known today as a car manufacturer.

-Bret
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 4:06 PM
Yes, correct & on to You.
  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:45 PM

Bristol 188

 

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, October 27, 2007 6:12 AM

This is a western twin engined supersonic research vehicle of the late 50s / early 60s, of troublesome stainless steel construction. It's real purpose was never fully realised due to it's unexpectedly high fuel consumption. 3 were made, 2 flew & 1 remains (static).

Some of the research data was put to use in an globally famous, georgeous aircraft which is also no longer flying.

The aircraft share a nickname with an axis aircraft of WW2.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, October 26, 2007 8:03 PM

You are correct. Fonderie Min. made a 1/48 kit which seems to be widely regarded as one of the worst kits every sold. I bought a set of decals for this a/c in IAF, since most Israeli markings from yore are pretty interchangeable, and they listed a kit by "HiTech" in 1/72, but I've never found it.

On to you

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, October 26, 2007 5:02 PM

This will be carrying on with the french theme;

Sud-Quest SO.4050 Vautour?

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, October 26, 2007 12:44 PM

Name this aircraft. And better yet, help me find a model in 1/72!!

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, October 26, 2007 6:03 AM

Yes, nail on the head with the 4000.

Yet another capable aircraft down the pan with the assistance of inferior US product.

Onto You bondoman 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, October 26, 2007 2:26 AM
It's the Mirage 4000.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by wdolson2 on Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:28 PM

It's definitely not the F-20.  That only had one engine, was not a state of the art fighter, and was introduced in the early 1980s.  I remember seeing the prototype fly over my high school.  (I grew up in Los Angeles.)

 The description fits the CF-105 better, though it was a late 50s design and I believe it had turbojets rather than turbo fans.  I wasn't aware that turbofans could be used on mach 1+ aircraft.

I would guess that the plane your looking for is probably a Mirage, but I am not all that familiar with the varients and time lines for those aircraft. 

 Bill

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: San Francisco, CA
Posted by telsono on Thursday, October 25, 2007 5:06 PM

Would this be the F-20 Tigershark?

Mike T.

Beware the hobby that eats.  - Ben Franklin

Do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out. - Ben Franklin

The U.S. Constitution  doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Ben Franklin

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, October 25, 2007 4:40 PM

This western aircraft was a child of the late 60s, being a twin turbofan delta fighter from a reputed manufacturer with large exports to its name.

It's initial development was in reply to requested proposals which were cancelled, the aircraft design & build then being funded by the manufacturer in response to expected export sales. For several reasons the export market never materialised, the prospective customers electing for something inferior.

Had the aircraft been brought to production, it would have been the "superior" air superiority fighter of it generation.

Its USPs were some of the construction methods used, and the control surface layout?

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Thursday, October 25, 2007 3:10 AM
Milairjunkie, You got it right. Initially the plane was fitted with the RD-45F`s. The VK-1 was fitted on the second prototype after the crash of the first one. It`s on to you now!
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:59 PM
OK, grasping at straws here, but the Lavochkin La-200 fits the description - almost (2 x VK-1s, not RD-45Fs)?
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Monday, October 22, 2007 3:24 AM
Nope, try the third plane in the competition Smile,Wink, & Grin [swg] !
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, October 19, 2007 9:39 AM

Would that be the rather ugly MIG I-320 R-1.

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Friday, October 19, 2007 3:48 AM

Nope, it`s not the SU. The SU was the first plane in the competition that flew, actually it was the plane that started it all. The craft i`m asking for has the same engine mount. You`re close, but not close enoughBow [bow].

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:35 AM

Suhoi Su-15 Samolet P.

Tandem mounted jets, offset cockpit. 

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Thursday, October 18, 2007 10:17 AM

OK, so i actually got it right Make a Toast [#toast] ! And now i`m with the tough part, asking the next question. So what would it be Sign - With Stupid [#wstupid] ? Here it is, that plane was built in 1949 and took it`s maiden flight on september the sixteenth the same year and was a part of the competition for first all weather interceptor for the USSR. Even though his counterpart made his first flight almost 5 months earlier it was obviously the better plane. It was powered by two RD-45F engines, and those were fit inside quite ingeniously. Despite the obvious quality of the aircraft, the generals desided that it`s not worth it against massive nuclear B-29 attacks so they just cancelled the order /first order was placed in 1951 for 50 aircraft/. Name that plane.

P.S. Sorry if i was slow with the question but keep in mind the time difference Propeller [8-]!

  • Member since
    December 2003
  • From: New York
Posted by skybolt2003 on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 3:02 PM
Its on to Congo79. He got it right.
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Wednesday, October 17, 2007 2:41 PM

The M50 was planned to start with 4 VD-7M motors from the Tu-22 as a stop gap before the delivery of M16-17 engines. VD-7M's couldn't be converted in time, so VD-7A's were fitted, the M50 then becoming the M50A. In early 1961, the two inboard engines were upgraded to VD-7MA afterburning units.

In the 1961 the aircraft seen at display practice & display had 2 VD-7A's + 2 VD-7MA's.

 I belive it's someones turn to chuck a new one into the pot!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.