SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728384 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, February 15, 2008 10:22 PM
P-43?
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:00 AM

The Penguin thnks he knows! Seversky 2PA. Designed in 1397, two sold to the Russians, similar engine to the I-16, two seats, slightly faster.

http://www.davidpride.com/Aviation/PoF/PoF_054.htm

http://ww2drawings.jexiste.fr/Files/2-Airplanes/Allies/1-USA/02-Fighter-Bombers/2PA/2PA.htm

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Saturday, February 16, 2008 7:05 AM
You`ve got it sir Bow [bow], but Trexx was first, so it`s your turn mate. Apart from that, does anyone have some info and pics about the amfibian version 2PA-A. In the article, were i first read about this bird, there`s only one pic of the 2PA-A on the take off and no additional info except that it was tested by the Russian NAVY. I`m really interested to see the undercariage.
  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Sunday, February 17, 2008 12:54 PM

 congo79 wrote:
You`ve got it sir Bow [bow], but Trexx was first, so it`s your turn mate. Apart from that, does anyone have some info and pics about the amfibian version 2PA-A. In the article, were i first read about this bird, there`s only one pic of the 2PA-A on the take off and no additional info except that it was tested by the Russian NAVY. I`m really interested to see the undercariage.

God bless Google

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Monday, February 18, 2008 2:53 PM

 congo79 wrote:
You`ve got it sir Bow [bow], but Trexx was first, so it`s your turn mate. Apart from that, does anyone have some info and pics about the amfibian version 2PA-A. In the article, were i first read about this bird, there`s only one pic of the 2PA-A on the take off and no additional info except that it was tested by the Russian NAVY. I`m really interested to see the undercariage.

 

I'm thinking... I'm thinking...

OK.

Who is credited as the first to publish a theory on the use of air power in the strategic sense... ? What was the publication?

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Monday, February 18, 2008 3:05 PM
 trexx wrote:

 

I'm thinking... I'm thinking...

OK.

Who is credited as the first to publish a theory on the use of air power in the strategic sense... ? What was the publication?

That would be Giulio Douhet, Undersecretary of Air to Mussolini in the 1920s, in his book The Command of the Air, published in 1921.

Cheers,

Chris (who studied the subject at university Smile [:)]

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Monday, February 18, 2008 3:19 PM
I`ll have to go with Gen. Julio Due /i`m not sure about the spelling/ in the book called Aerial Supremecy in the early twenties but it got out in 1932 after his death. I had the chance to read it and it`s a really great book. Gen. Due offered a science fiction novel in 1918 called Victory on the wings /i`m not sure for the name since i`m translating from bulgarian and mistakes are possible/ but i only heard about it so may be he first wrote about air supremecy there, but i`m just guessing. And something interresting, he was supposing there that the arch enemy - Germany, is useing 2000 massive tanks at 4000 tons each, powered by 6 diesels with combined power of 6000 h.p. I think the General went too far with this, but never the less in the novel the germans lost because the lack of air supremecy. OK so i`m definitely going with the novel!
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Monday, February 18, 2008 3:40 PM

 congo79 wrote:
I`ll have to go with Gen. Julio Due /i`m not sure about the spelling/ in the book called Aerial Supremecy in the early twenties

The title of the book in Italian is Il dominio dell'aria, which could easily be translated as Aerial Supremecy. You may well be right about the novel, though, whch concerned the strategic use of air power, and which he wrote while in prison, following a disagreement with his superior officers and subsequent court martial, in 1916.

Do you want another go?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Monday, February 18, 2008 4:01 PM
Interresting missmatch of the dates Whistling [:-^] it seem like my refferences are wrong but in my copy of the book /first edition in bulgaria/ it says that it was first issued in 1932 /after his death/. As about the novel it was mentioned in a historycal forum but the talks there was about that monster tank i wrote about. Well let trexx do the thinking which of us is right, and don`t forget that we both may be out of track and the right answer could be something like Jules Verne Sign - With Stupid [#wstupid] !!!
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Monday, February 18, 2008 4:16 PM

 

That would be Giulio Douhet, Undersecretary of Air to Mussolini in the 1920s, in his book The Command of the Air, published in 1921.

Cheers,

Chris (who studied the subject at university Smile [:)]

 

 

You smart, Bast__rds! DANG! Unstumpable... I'm getting miffed!

 Chris Hall nailed it. Both answers are correct. The Italian General who monkeyed around with bombardment using airplanes prior to World War One and wrote some interesting thoughts that were born from his endeavors.

Ok, Chris you're up...

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 4:10 AM

Right, here we go.

This British triplane, first flown in 1918, had an enclosed cockpit and a central engine room with four engines, turning chain-driven, wing-mounted propellers. The second version was more conventional, and had an open cockpit and engines mounted in tandem in wing-mounted nacelles.

The final version was powered by coal-fuelled steam turbines. Although the only problem with the turbines themselves was that they were too powerful for the aircraft's airframe, neither of the two examples of this version actually flew.

Name that plane!

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 11:35 AM
i`ll have to say The Bristol Braemar. And here`s i nice little article with a photo http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mchughes/tree/pages/Braemar_Overview.htm
  • Member since
    June 2006
  • From: Patterson, CA
Posted by SoD Stitch on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 12:12 PM

 congo79 wrote:
I`ll have to go with Gen. Julio Due /i`m not sure about the spelling/ in the book called Aerial Supremecy in the early twenties but it got out in 1932 after his death. I had the chance to read it and it`s a really great book. Gen. Due offered a science fiction novel in 1918 called Victory on the wings /i`m not sure for the name since i`m translating from bulgarian and mistakes are possible/ but i only heard about it so may be he first wrote about air supremecy there, but i`m just guessing. And something interresting, he was supposing there that the arch enemy - Germany, is useing 2000 massive tanks at 4000 tons each, powered by 6 diesels with combined power of 6000 h.p. I think the General went too far with this, but never the less in the novel the germans lost because the lack of air supremecy. OK so i`m definitely going with the novel!

Interestingly enough, toward the end of WWII, Germany actually did consider building a super-tank as Douhe predicted; it was to be powered by a couple of submarine diesel engines. I'll see if I can't find my reference material and post more details tomorrow.

1/48th Monogram A-37 Dragonfly: 95% (so close!); 1/35th Academy UH-60L: 90%; 1/35th Dragon "Ersatz" M10: 75%; 1/35th DML E-100 Super Heavy Tank: 100%; 1/48 YF-12A, 95%; 1/48 U-2R: 90%; 1/48 B-58 Hustler: 50%; 1/32 F-117, 50%; 1/48 Rafale M: 50%; 1/48 F-105D: 75%; 1/48 SOS A-1H Skyraider: 50%; 1/48th Hobby Boss Su-27: 50%; 1/16th Revell Lamborghini Countach: 75%; 1/12th Otaki Lamborghini Countach: 25%; Tamiya 1/35th M3 Bradley Cavalry Fighting Vehicle: 25%

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 1:35 PM

 congo79 wrote:
i`ll have to say The Bristol Braemar. And here`s i nice little article with a photo http://homepage.ntlworld.com/mchughes/tree/pages/Braemar_Overview.htm  

Braemar it is. The steam-powered version (called the Bristol Tramp) was ordered by the Royal Mail Steam Packet Company, whose engineers had little experinece of internal combustion engines, but knew their way around a steam engine...

Braemar: http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/bristol_braemar.php

Pullman (luxury passenger version of Braemar): http://www.aviastar.org/air/england/bristol_pullman.php

Tramp: http://www.edcoatescollection.com/ac6/Bristol%2037%20Tramp.html

Your turn, Congo!

Cheers,

Chris.

 

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 4:07 PM
OK, i know that i`ve stalled the quiz a little bit, but here`s the new question. This plane was based /if not identical/ on a fairly famous plane used from the mid 30`s well into the WW II,  was used as an advanced trainer, and took off for the first time in 1942. The predecesor was famous with its agility, even though even in the begining of his fighting career he was thought to be already obsolete in some aspects. Oh and another clue, it was used even after the end of the war, but with other countries airforces of course. Name that plane.
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: New Iberia, La.
Posted by artabr on Wednesday, February 20, 2008 6:54 PM
Arado Ar 96B ?
God & the soldier we like adore, In times of trouble not before. When troubles ended & all things righted God is forgotten & the soldier is slighted.       Francis Quarles 1592-1644
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Thursday, February 21, 2008 7:09 AM
No, not even close.
  • Member since
    January 2008
  • From: New Iberia, La.
Posted by artabr on Thursday, February 21, 2008 8:44 AM
 I didn't think so. The  date was off.  Try try agian.Big Smile [:D]         ART
God & the soldier we like adore, In times of trouble not before. When troubles ended & all things righted God is forgotten & the soldier is slighted.       Francis Quarles 1592-1644
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Thursday, February 21, 2008 9:51 AM

Contenders might include Polikarpov, Fiat and Nakajima. Of those, I'd go for Polikarpov... now to see if they made a trainer that looked like an I-16.

Edit: Polikarpov I-16 UTI

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Thursday, February 21, 2008 11:53 AM

The AT-6 Texan? Confused [%-)]

Tom T Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Thursday, February 21, 2008 1:32 PM

Nice thinking Brews, but it`s not the I-16/UTI-4. But in some ways you`re not so far off the right answer. Here`s a little tip the original plane and the successor were produced by different companies.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Thursday, February 21, 2008 2:11 PM

It's...

 THAT year, "1942" that is making mine and others inclination to the solution incorrect.

If not for that late year it could've been the Bf-108 "Taupin" and/or the AT-6 "Texan"

So I was thinking some Northrop dirivitive that the Swiss used... Hmmm...

They copied a few types from the U.S.A. around that time...

 

AM I -----> (((WARM?)))

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:14 PM
Nope, it`s really cold, brrrrrrrrrrr.
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Thursday, February 21, 2008 5:29 PM

 congo79 wrote:
Nope, it`s really cold, brrrrrrrrrrr.

 

DRAT!

 

OK Guys, Its gotta be Russian...

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Friday, February 22, 2008 3:29 AM

Bücker Bü 181A / D Bestmann, as produced from 1942 by Fokker, AB Hägglund & Söner, Zlin, and the Egyptian firm Republic and used, during and after the war, by Sweden, Czechslovakia, Egypt, Algeria, Hungary and Switzerland? 

Just a guess, really.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Friday, February 22, 2008 7:34 AM

Even cooooooooooolder. OK here`s a big clue, at the end of the war, the trainer was supposed to be used in suicide missions, but i`m not sure that they actually did use it for that.

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:30 PM

Well the Fieseler Fi 103, (V-1) was never considered manueverable or agile...

The year of first flight is correct... and it was used by other countries after the war...

 

I'm dang stumped...

 

  • Member since
    April 2005
  • From: Baton Rouge, LA
Posted by T_Terrific on Friday, February 22, 2008 1:58 PM

 congo79 wrote:
Interresting missmatch of the dates Whistling [:-^] it seem like my refferences are wrong but in my copy of the book /first edition in bulgaria/ it says that it was first issued in 1932 /after his death/. 

Hey Cong:

Is this the same book you got this question out of Whistling [:-^]?

In other words, if you are using a virtually unknown reference book that has information that conflicts with others, and if nobody can find the answer anyplace else, how are we supposed to figure it out? Confused [%-)]

Tom Cowboy [C):-)]

Tom TCowboy

“Failure is the opportunity to begin again more intelligently.”-Henry Ford

"Except in the fundamentals, think and let think"- J. Wesley

"I am impatient with stupidity, my people have learned to live without it"-Klaatu: "The Day the Earth Stood Still"

"All my men believe in God, they are ordered to"-Adolph Hitler

  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Friday, February 22, 2008 3:52 PM
No no, it`s obviously the same book but the publisher put the wrong dates.
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Friday, February 22, 2008 3:58 PM

It appears that i really put a tough one, so here`s the next clue: The trainer was built in continental Asia.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.