SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728385 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Indy
Posted by raider83 on Saturday, April 5, 2008 7:34 PM
Was it an Avenger? Just a wild guess. Confused [%-)]
On the bench: Monogram 1/48 Kingfisher Cardinal Ritter- Class 1A 2008 Indiana State Football Champs
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Saturday, April 5, 2008 11:10 PM
Nope. It wasn't what you would expect, but it was a Grumman.
''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, April 6, 2008 12:03 AM

Well, Wikipedia says it was a Grumman Widgeon, flown by Captain Johnny Haggins and Major Wynant Farr, who, having been scrambled by another, returning, aircraft,  spotted a U-boat beneath the surface. They couldn't depth-charge the boat without determining its depth, and were almost BINGO fuel themselves when she rose to periscope depth. They then dropped two depth charges, almost literally blowing the boat out of the water.

Oddly enough, the date of this far-from-insignificant event does not seem to have been recorded.

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Sunday, April 6, 2008 12:11 AM

Yep! You got it Chris!

By the way, this event took place only 25 miles off of our coast. Just about an hour's boatride from the local marina near my house.

''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, April 6, 2008 12:23 AM

OK - according to press reports earlier this week, what achievement might Admiral George J. Dufek have shared with some rather special Adelie penguins? Smile [:)]

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by Matt90 on Sunday, April 6, 2008 12:30 AM
:) I see we watch the same BBC!
''Do your damndest in an ostentatious manner all the time.'' -General George S. Patton
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Sunday, April 6, 2008 12:58 AM
 chris hall wrote:
Oddly enough, the date of this far-from-insignificant event does not seem to have been recorded.

Not even on www.uboat.net ?

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Sunday, April 6, 2008 1:01 AM
 chris hall wrote:

OK - according to press reports earlier this week, what achievement might Admiral George J. Dufek have shared with some rather special Adelie penguins? Smile [:)]

I'm guessing ... he didn't really fly after all?

Dufek was an Antarctic flyer by reputation.

  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Sunday, April 6, 2008 3:41 AM

Yes he did - and so did the pengies (in CGI form, anyway Smile [:)] ) Question is, where did he fly?

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 7:15 AM
About time for a clue?
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 7:46 AM

It's easy enough to google. Hint - the pengies didn't really do what he did!

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 7:56 AM

Landed on the South Pole.  

I don't google answers unless no one knows it and the quiz has stalled.Evil [}:)]

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    February 2004
  • From: Weymouth, Dorset, UK
Posted by chris hall on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:11 AM

That's the one! Your turn,Shark!

Cheers,

Chris.

Cute and cuddly, boys, cute and cuddly!
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:19 AM

What is this?

 

Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:22 AM
It's a Saab, the 21 I think?  Wasn't it converted to jet power, or something?
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:32 AM
Righto!  The J21, later converted to the J21R with a jet.  Its all yours!Thumbs Up [tup]
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 8:38 AM

In the 1950's the Americans had 2 (or more?) misnamed aircraft.  One should have had the same family name as the earlier aircraft, as the changes were small, but it had a whole new name (or number, rather), to get funding, as a new aircraft.  Conversely, another aircraft had a such radical departure from it's earlier siblings, it should have had a new name/number, but, to get it in, it just had a letter added to the number, to make it another in the series.

Can you name the aircraft?

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 9:28 AM

One, I guess, would be the F-102/F106

The other would be the F-84F?

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 10:14 AM

The F-84F is correct, but the other no.  I just double checked the history of this other one, and, it seems that between the original, and the revised, there was a 3rd designation, but only used for the prototype, where it was realised that even more revisions were needed, leading to the 3rd aircraft number.

Remember, this aircraft was renamed to make out it was a new aircraft...

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 2:49 PM
FJ-4 Fury?
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 3:47 PM
Well, the Fury would also answer the question of a radically altered aircraft that kept it's designation.  However, I'm looking for an aircraft that was given a new designation for political purposes...
  • Member since
    January 2004
  • From: VARNA, BULARIA
Posted by congo79 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 3:56 PM

Could it be the Panther/Cougar?

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North East Texas
Posted by roadkill_275 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:36 PM
You're probably looking for the B-29 to B-50. Boeing and the Air Force couldn't sell Congress on a WWII bomber in the 50s', {EDITED FOR ACCURACY}. So they called it the B-50. I think at one time the B-50 was called the B-29C or maybe D
Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:50 PM
Hmmm, the B-50 flew on R-4360 Pratt radials.
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North East Texas
Posted by roadkill_275 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:55 PM

Ooops, My bad, You're completely correct.

 

The only other one I can think of is the B-36 to YB-60. It lost out to the B-52 because of Congressional shenanigans. The YB-60 would've been a better plane IMHO. 

Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 4:55 PM
Well done Roadkill!  Yes, indeed, the B-50 was basically a B-29 with new engines, and some other new bits.  Yes, sometimes a new engine can make a whole new aircraft (Hawker Typhoon became the Tempest, Handley-Page Hampden became the Hereford), but, in this instance, it was to get funding, primarily, that the name was changed.  Over to you...
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 5:07 PM
 roadkill_275 wrote:

Ooops, My bad, You're completely correct.

 

The only other one I can think of is the B-36 to YB-60. It lost out to the B-52 because of Congressional shenanigans. The YB-60 would've been a better plane IMHO. 

Something tells me you grew up around Fort Worth?
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: North East Texas
Posted by roadkill_275 on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 5:31 PM

Here's mine:

Name the Aircraft and the nickname of the aircraft that is known as the loudest aircraft ever built  My only hint is it was in the fifties. And there is a kit of it!

Kevin M. Bodkins "Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup" American By Birth, Southern By the Grace of God! www.milavia.com Christian Modelers For McCain
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 5:44 PM
Ryan FR-1 Fireball?
  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Northern California
Posted by trexx on Wednesday, April 9, 2008 5:46 PM

I know! It's a turbo-prop version of the F-84....

 

Republic XF-84H (XF-106) Thunderscreech 

Republic XF-84H (XF-106) Thunderscreech 

Check out the "T" Tail!

This plane was dang high performance, but simply, too loud

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.