SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 7:30 PM

.....or was that Fireball?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    November 2004
  • From: Columbia Gorge
Posted by brain44 on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 9:43 AM

XF-84H Thunderscreech by Republic?

 

Brian  Cowboy

"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I expect the same from them." John Bernard Books (The Shootist)
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 7:13 AM

Ryan Firebee?

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Tuesday, February 9, 2010 12:11 AM

Curtis XF-15C powered by a piston engine and a turbojet.

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, February 8, 2010 11:20 PM

nope, they built more than a dozen of the Xb-35/YB-49s.  This aircraft was designed to use two different types of propulsion at the same time, instead of being designed for one and then changed to another.

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: Novi, Mi
Posted by Lancair IV on Monday, February 8, 2010 9:07 PM

Northrop YB-49?

 

Rob Byrnes

Novi, Mi

  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Monday, February 8, 2010 6:55 PM

OK, this one shouldnt be too hard.

I'm looking for an aircraft.  This plane was never put into production, with only three examples built.  It flew quite well, and had good performance, but by the time it got into the air there were new forms of propulsion being brought into service.  Of the three, one crashed, while a second was scrapped.  It was a unique design in that it was to use two different forms of propulsion.  This was also the last aircraft designed by this manufacturer for this intended role. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, February 6, 2010 10:02 PM

That's the one. i've been a long time fan of WIGE aircraft, it's just weird to see, since most people aren't used to seeing a plane that close to the water

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    January 2009
Posted by F-8fanatic on Saturday, February 6, 2010 8:12 PM

That would have to be the Soviet Lun Ekranoplan....built in 1987.  It is a wing-in-ground effect plane, designed to fly close to the surface of the water and take advantage of ground effect to move a very heavy load at nearly 400 miles per hour. 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, February 5, 2010 9:15 PM

Nope, the only thing unusual about the spruce goose was it's size. This plane actually reached operational service in 1987, though only one was built

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    September 2009
  • From: Spring Branch, TX
Posted by satch_ip on Friday, February 5, 2010 7:51 PM

Spruce Goose?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, February 5, 2010 7:39 PM

no, and nope

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Friday, February 5, 2010 6:37 PM

ME-323 Gigant?

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, February 5, 2010 6:26 PM

The Bristol Brabazon, with it 4 pairs of coupled engines.

 

How about the ANT-20?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, February 5, 2010 5:28 PM

nope, that's not it. what aircraft is that one??

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, February 5, 2010 5:12 PM

Would this be the big beastie;

         ?

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Friday, February 5, 2010 4:33 PM

This aircraft is very unusual in that it's maximum altitude of 24,600 ft was rarely reached, in fact most flights didn't go higher than 2000ft. It suffered from sever stability and control deficiencies and also required a massive amount of power to take off (8 engines). The aircraft's design, while strange, was ingenious and gave it tremendous load carrying ability and range.

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Friday, February 5, 2010 9:07 AM

Borg R3-MC0

I thought an american design for the london-melbourne race was not to obscure for this quiz but since there was almost no response I think I was wrong on that judgement. Black Eye

Like said, not my line at all, but you would have thought with an air racer GB going on there may have been more forthcoming?

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Friday, February 5, 2010 9:01 AM

Irish swoop was indeed the plane I was looking for. A further development of Irish Swoop was the Bellanca 28-90, a light bomber. Spain ordered several 28-90's but they where never delivered.

I thought an american design for the london-melbourne race was not to obscure for this quiz but since there was almost no response I think I was wrong on that judgement. Black Eye

Navypitsnipe, it is your turn! Toast

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Thursday, February 4, 2010 5:27 PM

i cheated and used a combination of google and wikipedia to find the answer a few days ago. i wasn't going to put the answer up but since everybody seems stumped i'll post what i found. the only plane i was able to find is the "Irish Swoop" it was a Bellanca 28-70 built for Col. James Fitzmaurice to enter in the 1934 MacRobertson Race from England to Australia

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Thursday, February 4, 2010 6:21 AM

Milairjunkie

Would the "luck of the Irish" have anything to do with the boat owned by both Sopwith & Fairey?

No, the Irish connection has to do with the name of the plane and the pilot. The design itself was US (another hint).

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Thursday, February 4, 2010 5:02 AM

Im afraid to say after much head scratching I am done on this one, civvy street really isn't my strong point.

Would the "luck of the Irish" have anything to do with the boat owned by both Sopwith & Fairey?

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Thursday, February 4, 2010 3:16 AM

eeehh, no replies? Is my question to vague? Unintresting subject?

Mhhhh, lets try to better the sitiuation: I am looking for an entry in the biggest, single event race of the 1930's.

  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Monday, February 1, 2010 9:37 AM

No relpies yet, so here is a hint: the so-called "Luck of the Irish" could not save this plane from beein a failure.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Sunday, January 31, 2010 1:15 PM

 Thanks for the correction on that one, i received bad information and didn't verify it. the engine mounting setup for the Sea Fury was heavily based on the Butcher Bird. the first production Sea Fury flew in January 1946.

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Sunday, January 31, 2010 5:32 AM

OK:

I am looking for a race plane which was failure. A redesigned variant was made in a small series production but never reached its intended client.

  • Member since
    October 2007
  • From: Scotland
Posted by Milairjunkie on Saturday, January 30, 2010 12:37 PM

navypitsnipe

thanks. this aircraft was the final development of Kurt Tank's "Butcher Bird". NOTE: NOT the final evolution, this aircraft was the final development of a aircraft that was heavily based on the TA 152.

Sour grapes I know, but if the Hawker Fury / Sea Fury were "heavily based" on the Ta 152, considering the Ta 152 reached the Luftwaffe in January 1945 & the Fury first in September 1944, this gave Hawker a period of -6 months to "heavily base" the Fury on the Ta 152.

 

 

Borg R3-MC0Osher, I do belive the floor is yours.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, January 30, 2010 11:17 AM

That's not the one i was looking for but it's close enough. the answer i was looking for was the Hawker Hunter which was essentially a swept wing version of the Sea Hawk. the prototype P.1035 was a highly modified Sea Fury, the design was redone as the P.1040 which became the Sea Hawk. Over to you

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
  • Member since
    September 2004
  • From: Utereg
Posted by Borg R3-MC0 on Saturday, January 30, 2010 11:07 AM

I think the anwser is the Hawker Sea Hawk, it started as a development of the Fury; as the project p. 1035.

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: USS Big Nasty, Norfolk, Va
Posted by navypitsnipe on Saturday, January 30, 2010 8:13 AM

you're on the right track with those aircraft, but you need to look at what was developed from them. thin k early british jets

40,000 Tons of Diplomacy + 2,200 Marines = Toughest fighting team in the world Sis pacis instruo pro bellum
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.