SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Aircraft Trivia Quiz

728407 views
7409 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:39 PM
John, are you around? Has anyone gotten it yet?
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:56 PM
Sorry, the grandkids are here and even with 4 computers on the net I've had little time.  The answers posited are correct, but you two have split them.  What now?

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Friday, June 27, 2008 12:20 AM
Mr Eaton, you must pose a tiebreaker! :) only for the two that split the answes:
  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: Tucson
Posted by cardshark_14 on Friday, June 27, 2008 1:01 AM
 jeaton01 wrote:
Sorry, the grandkids are here and even with 4 computers on the net I've had little time.  The answers posited are correct, but you two have split them.  What now?


No problem. I was just starting to wonder if everything was okay. There've been a lot of accidents on the forums recently. Glad to hear that you are spending time with family. Smile [:)]

I'm fine with a tie breaker, however if mojo has a question lined up he can take it, as I don't have one.

Cheers,
Alex
Never trust anyone who refuses to drink domestic beer, laugh at the Three Stooges, or crank Back In Black.
  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Friday, June 27, 2008 2:55 AM

Break a leg, sprain a foot, chuck a frisbee, get us a ???

 

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, June 27, 2008 8:04 AM

Okay, let's try an easy one to keep things moving along.

 

Name the biplane that has the highest production number of all?

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: San Francisco, CA
Posted by telsono on Friday, June 27, 2008 11:53 AM

That would be the Antonov An-2 Colt with over 18,000 aircraft produced.

Mike T.

Beware the hobby that eats.  - Ben Franklin

Do not fear mistakes. You will know failure. Continue to reach out. - Ben Franklin

The U.S. Constitution  doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. - Ben Franklin

  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, June 27, 2008 2:05 PM

Not an Antonov of any kind, sorry Mike.

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Friday, June 27, 2008 6:18 PM

Polikarpov Po-2. 40,000+

Cheers, Richie

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Shell Beach, California
Posted by mojodoctor on Friday, June 27, 2008 7:10 PM

The Polikarpov is it!

 

In fact, it's the second all time most produced aircraft of any kind second to the Cessna 172.

 

Whatcha got fer us Richie?

Matt Fly fast, fly low, turn left!
  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 12:54 AM

Maybe this is easy, dunno. Anyway here it is:

What type Allied aircraft was credited with the first 'kill' against a german plane, and the first American plane to sink a U-boat in WWII?

Cheers, Richie

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:01 AM

For the first part, I would suggest a PZL P11c.

For the second, I don't really know. My guesses range from a Blimp to a Dauntless ... or a Martin patrol bomber ...

I'll plump for the Dauntless.

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:10 AM
Sorry Brews, wrong on both counts. The same type did both feats.
Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    July 2007
  • From: Nuevo, CA
Posted by guardsmen22 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:49 AM
Was it a J4F Widgeon?
Helicopters can't really fly-they are just so ugly that the Earth immediately repels them. Photobucket
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: Edgware, London
Posted by osher on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:57 AM
PBY Catalina
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Kansas City MO
Posted by Dougums on Saturday, June 28, 2008 3:48 AM
A-29
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Bicester, England
Posted by KJ200 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 6:28 AM
Hudson?

Currently on the bench: AZ Models 1/72 Mig 17PF

  • Member since
    March 2006
Posted by simpilot34 on Saturday, June 28, 2008 6:59 AM

 Dougums wrote:
A-29

Yes Dougums, the Lockheed A-29 Hudson. You were right as well KJ, but Dougums beat ya to it. All yours Dougums! Well done!

Cheers, Richie

Cheers, Lt. Cmdr. Richie "To be prepared for war, is one of the most effectual means of preserving the peace."-George Washington
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Saturday, June 28, 2008 9:43 AM

 simpilot34 wrote:
Sorry Brews, wrong on both counts. The same type did both feats.

Ooh, I must defend my honour :)

A Hudson scored the first kill for the RAF on 8 October, 1939.

A P.11c shot down two Do 17s on 1 September, 1939. 

The Poles were allies too, after all.

 

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Kansas City MO
Posted by Dougums on Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:25 PM
   I figure I will post a fairly easy question due to the fact I completely guessed at  the last question.
 
How many crew members did the B-17 have?
 
Bonus ... name the positions... Wink [;)]
 
  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:01 PM

Crew of 10

Pilot,
co-pilot
navigator
bombardier
flight engineer
radio operator
waist gunners (2ea)
Ball turret gunner
tail gunner

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: Kansas City MO
Posted by Dougums on Saturday, June 28, 2008 2:20 PM
Very nice, Screaminhelo.  I just finished watching Memphis Belle. Thumbs Up [tup]Thumbs Up [tup]  On to you.


  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Saturday, June 28, 2008 8:07 PM

O.K.  Here goes another easy one.

Two aircraft were design projects for one country that were later, individually developed by two other countries into operational aircraft which were adversaries.  What were the project aircraft and what were the adversary aircraft?

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Sunday, June 29, 2008 1:03 PM

Maybe I was too confusing in my question.

HINT #1
One of the two design projects did reach the prototype stage but it was never completed.  The second design was never more than a paper project to my knowledge.

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Sunday, June 29, 2008 10:21 PM
 Dougums wrote:
   I figure I will post a fairly easy question due to the fact I completely guessed at  the last question.
How many crew members did the B-17 have?
Bonus ... name the positions... Wink [;)]

Late war, 8.  The Bombardier was replaced by a "Bombagator" in some aircraft. The Navigator was cross-trained as a Bombardier and took over his duties on the bomb run, "toggling on the leader" (hitting the bomb release switch as soon as he saw the bombs drop from the lead aircraft) since the Norden Bombsight wasn't needed. The cheek guns were also eliminated and the Nav took over the chin.  Some units also had a gunner ("Togglier") in place of the bombardier whose main function was the chin-turret and toggled the lead on the bomb run.  H2X radar-equipped Forts did away with the ball-turret and the gunner, and many squadrons eliminated the second waist gunner as well...

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 10:59 AM
HINT #2
The first aircraft was eventually developed into a fighter that bears more of a family resemblence than anything else.  The second aircraft was developed into fighter that appears very similar to the original design.

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:28 AM
I have to ask... Jet or prop?

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:32 AM
Jet

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Monday, June 30, 2008 11:55 AM

My jet knowledge stops around 1953...  Only thing that comes to mind is the YF-17/-F/A-18 run-off, but I don't think the F-17 was ever put into production.  Doesn't fit all your parameters, either...  I'm officially stumped.  Carry on without me, fellers...

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2004
  • From: Georgia
Posted by Screaminhelo on Monday, June 30, 2008 1:37 PM

 Hans von Hammer wrote:
My jet knowledge stops around 1953...  Only thing that comes to mind is the YF-17/-F/A-18 run-off, but I don't think the F-17 was ever put into production.  Doesn't fit all your parameters, either...  I'm officially stumped.  Carry on without me, fellers...

Not early enough Mike.  Since your jet knowledge stops in 1953 though, you should be right in the ballpark for the second half of the question.

More hints

The two production aircraft are quite well known for their conflict.

After all of the paperclips were out of the way, design#1 was very closely followed for a research aircraft to explore concepts that were not included in production aircraft#1. 

Design#2 seems to have been simply developed into a combat aircraft, although there is very little information available for the block of time between the design and production aircraft#2.

Mac

I Didn't do it!!!

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.