SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

do you thing parts count on some models is too high

13600 views
47 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2013
do you thing parts count on some models is too high
Posted by DURR on Monday, July 19, 2010 9:46 PM

i think  separate parts for every thing sometime is out of hand .   example   i am putting together a fleet of 1/700th scale destroyers  and many parts are only as big as pencil points  they break as you remove them from the sprue  or the carpet monster eats them.   parts this small can and should be molded on  to me in many cases it is like buy my model it has more parts then my competition   

 

ok done ranting   what do you guys/gals think

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:38 AM

I do think armor gets overcomplicated. The companies must think that part-count leads to bigger sales. I don't always have a ton of time and don't feel like putting together 500+ parts all the time, especially considering that each part needs to be cleaned up! I do understand that indy-tracks can add to the parts count, thus inflating it.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    June 2008
  • From: Iowa
Posted by Hans von Hammer on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:38 AM

Yeah, some kits are definately over-engineered...

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:11 AM

Oh yeah I think most Trumpeter kits are ridiculous. Hundreds of parts for stuff that could easily be combined.

Also most PE sets, I use about half of it. Which is why I don't buy the things much except for ships.

I like resin kits a lot where one part can replace dozens of plastic bits.

I like sticking stuff together of course, but gluing 16 flap actuator fairings to a wing doesn't do it for me.

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:53 AM

I agree with you guys, I try and avoid tanks when im frustrated beacuse of the small pieces. 

I like what bandai has started doing with some of their gundam kits, if there are inner workings that physically move and support weight with hinges and joints they come pre assembled and molded into one working piece, because there are ALOT of small pieces on those and loose one and it doesnt stand up

I know you guys dont do those kits but when the TREE count is in the 10s to 20s thats alot of parts

 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: New Jersey
Posted by redleg12 on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:09 AM

I will agree...some vendors have gone nuts wilh a pile of little parts to fill a box and raise a price. I love the detail but some parts are soo small and delicate, they are impossible to remove, and clean up....GRRRRR

Rounds Complete!!

"The Moral High Ground....A Great Place to Emplace Artillery."

  • Member since
    May 2010
Posted by plasticaddict on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:37 AM

bondoman

Oh yeah I think most Trumpeter kits are ridiculous. Hundreds of parts for stuff that could easily be combined.

Personally I like kits with more parts, adds to realism. On the other hand smaller parts mean more PE too as simpler parts of a complicated structure can be put together in PE parts.

Although sometimes I get frustrated, I generally like kits with more detail parts.

Cem.

 

  • Member since
    October 2009
  • From: South Carolina
Posted by jetmodeler on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:44 AM

I agree. There is way to many parts in some kits.

Makes you wonder why they don't just put the actual thing out there.Smile Dots

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Western North Carolina
Posted by Tojo72 on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:11 AM

Yes some kits are definitly over engineered,I think some companies divide stuff into assemblies just to increase their parts count !!

  • Member since
    September 2007
  • From: Truro Nova Scotia, Canada
Posted by SuppressionFire on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:54 AM

DML (Dragon Models limited) immediately pops into mind on this topic. Expect 1/3 of the parts to be allocated to the spare parts bin, the PE replaces plastic detail thus increasing the spares. The 3-in-1 series are great for extra parts IF you model armor of the same type. It boils down to initial cost.

Trumpeter usually (my limited experience with this brand) has the exact parts count for the basic model with few if any extras. One recent kit included 'clear' fuselage parts for a see-through effect....all of which were sent to the spares bin.

Tamiya pleases most modelers by simplifying detail into single plastic parts, many of which serious modelers scratch build anyways or resort to the AM for PE replacements. They have strayed from this formula a few times only to return to their roots.

Hobby Boss packs interior detail into their kits with few or no variant options. Detail is excellent at a reasonable price.

Before purchasing look over the options available and decide how much detail you need. Online is a excellent way to 'peek inside' without asking to do so at the store or be surprised at home. Cost & parts count should be considerations to get the most out of your time & enjoyment.

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/razordws/GB%20Badges/WMIIIGBsmall.jpg

 

 

  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: 41 Degrees 52.4 minutes North; 72 Degrees 7.3 minutes West
Posted by bbrowniii on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:08 AM

I'd say yes, there are some kits that have way too many parts.  I think it is the DML Pz IV (3-in1) kit that has something like 1400 parts.  Ridiculous.

I do think there has been a bit of a trend away from that (minus indy link tracks).  Most of the newer kits I have seen have parts counts in the 300 - 500 range.  Still high, but not extreme.  As a matter of fact, it does seem like most of the companies heard builders complaints with parts counts.  Again, looking at that DML kit, for a while, that seemed to be the goal DML was shooting for - kits with nearly or over 1000 parts.  Now, it seems like they and other companies have realized that, while we like detail, we also like the ability to actually finish a kit...

'All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing' - Edmund Burke (1770 ??)

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:16 AM

Yes...and no...

  • Member since
    November 2008
  • From: Biding my time, watching your lines.
Posted by PaintsWithBrush on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:34 AM

I guess it depends on one's manual dexterity and eyesight situation.

We ask for more detail and bemoan the high count of small parts.

DISCLAIMER: I am in the "older guy, dwindling eyesight" category so I don't mind lots of detail parts in a 1/35 armor kit but I would totally avoid a 1/700 model.

A 100% rider on a 70% bike will always defeat a 70% rider on a 100% bike. (Kenny Roberts)

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Steilacoom, Washington
Posted by Killjoy on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:13 AM

I completely agree that the high part count was a sales technique to appeal to those who complain about (Tamiya for example) older kits lacking or being 'soft' on detail.  That being said, the technology for plastic molding has come so far, that many of these very fine and minute details could easily be done as part of the whole instead of 50 separate parts.

But hopefully without opening a can-o-worms here, some of it depends on whether you gravitate more towards the builder end of the hobby or the painter end.  I personally like to assemble kits, but find it gets tedious.  I LOVE to paint however, and have had a ton of fun with a buddy who is a speed freak assembler putting together multiple plastic sci-fi kits for Warhammer 40k, and I was airbrushing as fast as he was assembling. 

In summary, If I see a parts count that high, I steer clear and head for a simpler kit while others I know go "ooh!  1000 parts!"  In the end, whatever makes you happy!

Chris

A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:05 PM

It also depends on what the parts are for, if the whole thing is going to be painted in the same camo who cares if the little hook or whatnot is molded in, but if it is something like the tools on the side of a tank they shouldnt be molded on for ease of painting.  but on that note they shouldnt all be seperate items either.

atleast for me, the carpet monster a lovecraftian terror more then a nuisance I dont have a kit to date that has all it's parts because of droping pieces

I stoped work on that 1/25th jagtpanther because I misplaces some of the tools

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 12:33 PM

Dragon actually learned from the feedback they received concerning too many parts/complexity from their 3 in 1 kits.  The now famous Mk IV C and 88 flak took such a beating from the high part count that they actually started a whole new line of kits to address the issue: the SMART kit line, which is now their main line for new releases...

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Steilacoom, Washington
Posted by Killjoy on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:06 PM

Maybe I am very careful or really lucky (probably a bit of both), but I rarely ever drop a piece when modeling, and can't remember EVER losing one. 

For those of you with clubs for hands, or the shakes, may I highly recommend something like this?

http://www.micromark.com/PARTS-CATCHING-APRON,8108.html

Chris

A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Florida
Posted by Railfan 233 on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 1:17 PM

It's the oposite for me. I don't have a lot of money to spend on my hobbies, so I normally build Revell/ Monogram cars and airplanes, with not a lot else. Parts count rarely excedes 150, so I never get as much build time as I want.

I would like to give it a shot with a 1/32 scale B-52, though That out to satisfy my build cravings for a whileBig Smile

  

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/razordws/GB%20Badges/WMIIIGBsmall.jpgRed, White, and YOU! group build of 2010

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:25 PM

I have and will avoid any of the Dragon super-kits due to high parts total. I completely basic construction for the Tamiya Panzer IV J and was satisfied with the part count. Not over engineered at  all and looks like the deal when built.

I think the paint job and weathering are more important in most cases to the finished project then parts count, unless maybe you're building a diorama.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

Zar
  • Member since
    October 2008
Posted by Zar on Tuesday, July 20, 2010 10:35 PM

Agree big time! Some models have way too many parts. I have been scared off by many Dragon kits when I see over 600 parts.

Dre
  • Member since
    June 2007
  • From: here, not over there
Posted by Dre on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 9:46 AM

Meh... high parts count helps keep me out of bars and out of jail.  

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Phil_H on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 10:08 AM

Try HobbyBoss's 1/48 T-34s - there's about 400 parts in something just slightly bigger than two packs of cards.Hmm

  • Member since
    January 2007
Posted by Gigatron on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:10 AM

In all honesty, I don't think I've ever taken notice of actual parts count.  The only time I notice is when I go from building a 1/48 plane to a 1/72 plane.  It goes from taking two months to build, to two days.  I don't mind that, so much Wink.  Otherwise, I'm just assuming they're giving you the number of parts to build the kit you purchased.  I enjoy scratchbuilding, but if I don't have to scratch every piece of missing detail, I'm not going to be upset.

Another time I noticed is when I built an Eduard FW-190.  There were so many parts left over, I thought I did something wrong.  Turns out, they include parts that will work on future releases, but not necessarily on the kit you're building.

-Fred

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Western North Carolina
Posted by Tojo72 on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:32 AM

Phil_H

Try HobbyBoss's 1/48 T-34s - there's about 400 parts in something just slightly bigger than two packs of cards.Hmm

You know Phil,it might have had a lot of parts,but I didn't find that kit to be over engineered or cumbersome,I guess a lot of the parts were the tracks.That was a pretty good kit to build.

AKA Raiderfan2779  TnT

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Massachusetts
Posted by jadgpanther302 on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:53 AM

Someone in the armor forum is putting together a Pz. IV B and it has individual nuts too attach.

Overkill.

  • Member since
    March 2008
  • From: Steilacoom, Washington
Posted by Killjoy on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:09 PM

Only individual nuts will attempt that kit! Propeller

A veteran is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:24 PM

Ya know, whats even the point?  You could spend all day putting them on, but someone who spent that much time painting and weathering it to perfection is gona have a nicer kit.  In a competition Id put money on them not giving you an award just because the kit was complicated, if anything more parts makes the assembly more difficult and gives chance for more mistakes

 

  • Member since
    July 2008
  • From: Florida
Posted by Railfan 233 on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:55 PM

I wouldn't mind giving the kit a shot (I can't afford any of the high-tech kits, so even if it's more complicated, I dream of being able to get a kit or two like that)

  

http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/razordws/GB%20Badges/WMIIIGBsmall.jpgRed, White, and YOU! group build of 2010

  • Member since
    December 2007
  • From: Bridgeview, Illinois
Posted by mg.mikael on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 4:01 PM

Are kits over-engineered, now that may be an understatement. Thankfully most kit brands realize that the majority of modelers don't want something that has a part count hitting the 4-digits. And for those who love the high part counts, their are the AM parts and some kit brands that still love to really cram those sprues in the box. Case in point, Cyber-Hobby.

Awhile back I purchased a 1/35 Cyber-Hobby Raketenwefer auf Fahrgestelle Pz. IV thinking it would be a neat one of a king build considering I hadn't seen anyone build it. (That probably has something to do with the fact the kit has an extremely high part count I only learned about after I bought it.Bang Head)

Long story short, here are the numbers.... total 1,339 parts (728 parts in grey styrene, 293 photo-etched metal, 288 "Magic Track" tracks, 25 clear styrene, 4 pre-bent brass, and 1 twisted steel wire). Yes, it's still sitting in the stash.

"A good plan executed now is better than a perfect plan next week." - George S. Patton

  Photobucket 

  • Member since
    April 2008
  • From: Philadelphia PA
Posted by smeagol the vile on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:05 PM

Yea, thats nuts, I couldnt imagine trying to put together all o those track links

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.