SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Name the top five war ships in naval history

10360 views
71 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Tuesday, September 11, 2012 4:54 PM

Sort of like white phosphorous but not real.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:41 AM

Tirpitz

Zuiho

Roma

Shinano

Fuso

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:02 AM

HMS Lollipop...

She was a good ship...

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 11:10 AM

Old Ordie

GMorrison

Old Ordie

Breaking off that attack to rush to the defense of the CVL USS Gambier Bay, the Johnston drove off another heavy cruiser.  She then fought off

Gambier Bay was actually a Casablanca class CVE, as were the other carriers.

You are absolutely correct, sir.  In my day, the little ones (which were much larger than Gambier Bay) were not designated that way, one of the dangers of working from memory a good deal when I write - cross bleeding time periods (aka, just plain befuddlement, LOL!)  CVEs were even punier than CVLs (run, Yamato, run Wink).

An interesting thing, though, about US Navy designations, especially in aviation, is that they change frequently (carrier and squadron designations).  An example would be, when I was embarked on the Kitty Hawk, she was CVA-63.  When she was decommisioned, many years later (nearly forty, in fact), she was designated CV-63, and had been for some time.  Which should I use when writing about her?

I was stationed on USS Lexington. When I served on her she was CVT-16. She was also CV-16, CVA-16 and AVT-16. When I have seen it all written out it is USS Lexington CV-16/CVA-16/CVT-16/AVT-16.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    May 2012
  • From: Milford, Ohio
Posted by Old Ordie on Wednesday, September 12, 2012 2:46 PM

subfixer

Old Ordie

... An interesting thing, though, about US Navy designations, especially in aviation, is that they change frequently (carrier and squadron designations).  An example would be, when I was embarked on the Kitty Hawk, she was CVA-63.  When she was decommisioned, many years later (nearly forty, in fact), she was designated CV-63, and had been for some time.  Which should I use when writing about her?

I was stationed on USS Lexington. When I served on her she was CVT-16. She was also CV-16, CVA-16 and AVT-16. When I have seen it all written out it is USS Lexington CV-16/CVA-16/CVT-16/AVT-16.

Well, that answers that question.  Thanks, subfixer.

Gamera

HMS Lollipop...

She was a good ship...

Yes, she was.  HMS Lollipop, mmmmmm ...

 

Flight deck:  Hasegawa 1:48 P-40E; Tamiya 1:48 A6M2 N Type 2 ('Rufe')

Elevators:  Airfix 1:72 Grumman Duck; AM 1:72 F-4J

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Saturday, September 29, 2012 9:50 AM

HMM.-- 1-H.M.S. VICTORY

            2-U.S.S.CONSTITUTION

            3-H.M.S. QUEEN ELIZABETH

            4-U.S.S.MAINE/OLYMPIA

            5-D.K.M. SCHARNHORST/BISMARK

This list is matched to my knowledge of warships.All usually follow "logical progression of design" All are significant for their time. Now there are many more and way to many to list in the top five,and,as you can see ,I fudged-sorry !      TANKER-builder

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Sunday, September 30, 2012 2:37 AM

Manstein's revenge

Tirpitz

Zuiho

Roma

Shinano

Fuso

Fuso? Could you elaborate why?

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Sunday, September 30, 2012 2:39 AM

SSBN- 658 Mariano Vallejo. Of the first generation SSBN, my Godfather was the skipper, and she  was the last to patrol, last to off-load her missiles and the last to arrive in Washington making her the last of the "Forty-one for Freedom."

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, September 30, 2012 11:15 AM

tigerman

Manstein's revenge

Tirpitz

Zuiho

Roma

Shinano

Fuso

Fuso? Could you elaborate why?

Lost with all hands...

  • Member since
    August 2012
Posted by Winetanker on Wednesday, October 3, 2012 8:32 PM

These kind of debates are interesting, but so open to .......debate.

By "naval history" does one mean impact on World History????

If so, those fire boats sent against the Spanish Armada are probably tops. Either that or the trireme's sent against the Persian fleet.

While I'd rate Enterprise (WW2--CV-3?) high, but it isn't like Japan would have won the war if she'd been lost. Ditto, Old Ironsides.

I don't see where Iowa class BB can be included since they are basically an evolutionary dead-end. Although, through retro-fitting, they still serve today; Aegis class ships are far superior.

....working my way up the airbrush learning curve......

  • Member since
    August 2012
Posted by Bissyboat on Thursday, October 4, 2012 3:51 PM

Some good suggestions here. I'm glad the fire ships get mentioned. Iowa class capitol ships were massive vessels, but yes they also marked the end to a long era of battleships. But what a high to end it on. Rating the top five boats in naval history are meant to be on a global scale. Of course, you could device a list of boats coming from one single country. There are no set rules.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.