SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Squadron Products P-40E Warhawk 1/48

3040 views
11 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Squadron Products P-40E Warhawk 1/48
Posted by Aggieman on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 7:00 PM

I have been busy at the bench to start this year.  Late last year I came across a photograph of a P-40F/L belonging to the 325th Fighter Group in North Africa, known more commonly as the "Checkertail Clan" after the distinctive yellow-and-black checkertail scheme painted on their tails.  I happen to love the P-40, so I actually have quite a few unbuilt kits in my stash, of which this Squadron Products release was one.

The kit came in a bag with a decent rendition of the original kit instructions and some kind of statement that it was number x of y total of this release.  What I came to find was that this kit began life as the AMT-Ertl P-40E released back in the mid-1990s.  There was a problem here, though.  The fuselage included in this "E" was of the "long" variety, which per my research was never an "E" model.  The elongated fuselage was introduced in the "F" variant to accomodate [aviation/flying issues] brought on by a different engine.

My inspiration was to build the Checkertail Clan Warhawk, so clearly this was exactly what I wanted.  Except that prior to even looking at this kit, I had purchased via eBay an actual AMT-Ertl P-40F which, when I opened the box, noted it did not contain the "F" fuselage.  So the idea of putting together a single P-40 quickly morphed into building two Warhawks.  All I had to do was swap the fuselage parts.

Anyway, this Squadron release contained resin parts for the air scoop that is common for early variants of the P-40.  That scoop is not on the "F" variant, which is what this so-called "E" release actually came with.  There also are resin parts that upgraded the cockpit quite nicely from the original kit parts.  Squadron's decal sheet is good although a few of them resisted all my efforts at getting them into place.  I eventually won that particular battle, though.

I built the ride of Colonel Robert L. Scott of the 23rd Fighter Group operating out of China in the Summer of 1942.  I always loved the insignia on this warbird with the flying tiger ripping through the Chinese insignia and the ripped apart Japanese banner.

The kit itself is not great.  People talk down the old Monogram P-40 a lot but I found that this AMT-Ertl kit was just a real PITA.  It has good detail overall but fit of the parts is not great.  I was unable to get any real dihedral established for the wings on this one (not so on the "F" that I built alongside this one).  I loathed the connectors for the gear doors. Way too obtrusive because they are big, fat blobs of plastic.  No detailing there at all. Some of that may very well be builder error but I won't be rushing out to acquire any additional AMT-Ertl Warhawks (would not be prudent given the existence of a couple of old Monogram, a Monogram Pro-Modeler, a 32nd scale Revell, and two of the new Airfix "B" variants already in my stash)...

[Build Photos]

Paints are Model Master with weathering from Tamiya weathering compounds and Flory wash.

I am disappointed with the pictures here.  Too many dark areas that I could not seem to get enough light into.  Not sure what that is the case.

Tags: P-40E
  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 8:58 PM

Boy, you were not kidding about the lack of dihedral on this build. Otherwise it looks pretty good. 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    March 2015
  • From: Streetsboro, Ohio
Posted by Toshi on Wednesday, March 22, 2017 9:17 PM

With all the issues you encountered, you did a great job on this build!

Toshi

On The Bench: Revell 1/48 B-25 Mitchell

 

Married to the most caring, loving, understanding, and beautiful wife in the world.  Mrs. Toshi

 

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Thursday, March 23, 2017 12:12 AM

Too bad about the dihedral, other than that it looks great.  We'll just claim RLS just pulled pushed too many negative G's!

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    February 2012
  • From: Olmsted Township, Ohio
Posted by lawdog114 on Thursday, March 23, 2017 2:24 AM
Nice job on Col. Scott's ride. It's my understanding that Squadron bought True Details and Aeromaster, which explains the branching to whole kits. I wish their selection was better. I find Sprue Brothers to fit my needs. We need a Merlin powered F/L in this scale bad, as the nose is completely different than the others. I want to build Lighthouse Louie but refuse to use that lousy Amtech kit.

 "Can you fly this plane and land it?...Surely you can't be serious....I am serious, and don't call me Shirley"

 

 

 

 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:56 AM

lawdog114
Nice job on Col. Scott's ride. It's my understanding that Squadron bought True Details and Aeromaster, which explains the branching to whole kits. I wish their selection was better. I find Sprue Brothers to fit my needs. We need a Merlin powered F/L in this scale bad, as the nose is completely different than the others. I want to build Lighthouse Louie but refuse to use that lousy Amtech kit.
 

Thanks Lawdog.  

I agree with the need for a good quality F/L Warhawk.  I'm not sure if it was AMT-Ertl or Amtech who originated this mold, but whoever, it has not aged well.  I'd prefer scratching out internal details on yet another Monogram "B" than tackling this turkey again.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:56 AM

Toshi

With all the issues you encountered, you did a great job on this build!

Toshi

 

Thanks Toshi.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:57 AM

jeaton01

Too bad about the dihedral, other than that it looks great.  We'll just claim RLS just pulled pushed too many negative G's!

 

I'll go with that explanation!

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Thursday, March 23, 2017 6:58 AM

stikpusher

Boy, you were not kidding about the lack of dihedral on this build. Otherwise it looks pretty good. 

 

Yeah, it looks like someone attached a 2x4 or something and called it a wing.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: SW Virginia
Posted by Gamera on Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:54 AM

Yeah the wing looks like a flat plane in the third from last photo! Still great job there, really nice work. 

"I dream in fire but work in clay." -Arthur Machen

 

  • Member since
    June 2014
Posted by BrandonK on Friday, March 24, 2017 10:11 AM

It may have beat you up during assembly but you won the war. This one looks quite good.

BK

On the bench:

A lot !! And I mean A LOT!!

2024 Kits on deck / in process / completed   

                         14 / 5 / 2  

                              Tongue Tied

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Tuesday, March 28, 2017 12:48 PM

Thanks for everyone's kind responses to my build of this less-than-stellar kit.  I did the best I could with it, and I stuck to it through all the trials it presented me, so I guess I have that going for me (which is nice).Wink

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.