SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Revell 1/72 C-54D Skymaster

3607 views
16 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Revell 1/72 C-54D Skymaster
Posted by Aggieman on Saturday, May 15, 2021 6:09 PM

It's a Candy Bomber!

This is one of those kits that I immediately grabbed upon its release a few years ago.  It has long been an interesting aircraft to me given its history in the Berlin Airlift of 1948-1949.  To that end, I used this famous photograph as inspiration, and as it turned out, a reason to persevere through what turned out to be a dog kit.

Yes, it's a bad kit.  At least, that was my experience with it.  The instructions are awful. Parts fit is far too often even worse.  Despite the overly busy decal sheet, the decals performed perfectly. 

So what was wrong with the parts fit?  The engines, for starters. Revell provides 4 full P&W R-2000-9 twin wasp radials.  Problem was, there was too much there and absolutely no room to fit all of that into the cowlings.  I ended up leaving off the rings that feed into the exhaust stacks just to be able to get the cowlings around the engines and fit properly against the separate cowl flap parts.

The landing gear were another rough spot.  The gear parts in and of themselves are fine, but when the instructions are as bad as these were, location of some of the parts became a big issue.  I think I got everything where it was supposed to go, but one part in particular was the forward gear door actuator.  It's a triangle that has a mounting bracket to the firewall as well as one leg of the triangle intended to mount to the cowling ceiling.  The instructions are not clear which leg is to go to the ceiling; lots of dry fitting revealed it to be the shorter of the three legs of the triangle.

But I'll give the kit designers major props for one impressive design feature that I don't believe I've seen employed on any other kit featuring rows of windows.  There is an inner shell to the cargo section of the fuselage where you install all the detail that is absolutely invisible once you close everything up.  The outer shell is the fuselage itself, with the expected window openings.  You install the clear window filler piece as normal, then when you put in the inner shell component, voila, you have protection against popping any of those tiny windows out of their mount, which results in small pieces rattling around inside your build.  So kudos on that.

I'm also not happy with my choice of paint.  I used Alclads for the exterior, over an Alclad shiny black primer coat.  But the primary paint I went with is dark aluminum, with white aluminum for the control surfaces.  I think the dark aluminum is just a bit too dark, but I used what I had in sufficient quantities to cover this bird.  And even in 72nd scale, this thing is big.  

The decals were entirely from the kit sheet.  They are very similar to the inspiration photo above, but don't appear to be an exact match.

You might notice the tiny stand under the tail in the first 4 of these photos.  That came with the kit.  I opted not to put any weight into this, knowing full well it would be a tail sitter but also knowing that I'm hanging it from a wall in my workshop, so why bother with the additional weight?

Next up, I need a big break from NMF, especially considering that I still have 3 in my to-build stash for this year.  I am therefore heading off to a galaxy far, far away to tackle the Republic Star Destroyer, first seen in Episode II - Attack of the Clones and then featured in the awesome battle that opens Episode III - Revenge of the Sith.  I picked up a lighting kit for this thing from MadMan Lighting, which is a first for me, as I've typically just set up my own lighting for most of the models that I have done lighting for (not very many of those, mind you).

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Saturday, May 15, 2021 8:02 PM

Very nice job, Aggieman - maybe you can make a silk purse from a sow's ear!  However, I don't think I'll be adding one to the stash any time soonSmile

Oh, and I think the paint looks just fine - well done.

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Northern California
Posted by jeaton01 on Saturday, May 15, 2021 10:49 PM

It looks great to me, Stephen.  I agree it's a kit that requires a lot of patience, just from looking at the one I have.  A lot of parts in that box!

John

To see build logs for my models:  http://goldeneramodel.com/mymodels/mymodels.html

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Saturday, May 15, 2021 11:33 PM

Yes I've got one too in the stash. Santa Fe Railroad "Sky Chief". Fresh flowers, meat and produce to any airfield in the Western US in a refrigerated cargo aircraft.

The tail stand is a real thing. Douglas was a bit behind the curve on designing an aircraft with tripod landing gear that could load freight in the same way as the C-47 or their Curtiss competitor the C-46.

The Berlin Airlift is a war in itself for which too little attention is given.

Historic tidbit: which airforce ran flights in volume from which location that did not have a runway?

 

Bill

 

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    March 2012
  • From: Corpus Christi, Tx
Posted by mustang1989 on Sunday, May 16, 2021 7:47 AM

Despite all the trouble it gave you it looks to have turned out well. I can see where the landing gear could get a bit tricky and it's a real shame that Revell didn't think about housing all the engine detail well under the cowlings but again....it looks like you made that all work out good. 

I did notice that the top "CARRIER" decal on the port side didn't adhere too well at the top but other than that you turned out a very good looking build bud.

                   

 Forum | Modelers Social Club Forum (proboards.com) 

  • Member since
    October 2019
  • From: New Braunfels, Texas
Posted by Tanker-Builder on Sunday, May 16, 2021 7:48 AM

Hi;

     Was that the plane that I grew up knowing as the DC-6-B , in civilian life?

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Sunday, May 16, 2021 11:53 AM

Mine is up on my  sod.  In spite of checking beforehand the fuselage has a big gap from interior being wider than inside of fuselage.

Also, isnt the C-54 the DC-4 and not the six?

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Sunday, May 16, 2021 12:22 PM

Tanker-Builder

Hi;

     Was that the plane that I grew up knowing as the DC-6-B , in civilian life?

 

No.

 

Bill

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Sunday, May 16, 2021 12:25 PM

It is a very welcome replacement to the rather excremental Mach 2 C-54.

 

Bill

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    May 2020
  • From: North East of England
Posted by Hutch6390 on Sunday, May 16, 2021 2:57 PM

GMorrison
Historic tidbit: which airforce ran flights in volume from which location that did not have a runway?

The RAF operated Sunderland flying boats from the river Elbe, near RAF Gatow, until the waterways they used to set down on froze over.  Ironically, they usually carried cargoes of salt!

Edit: - oops! just checked my facts, RAF Gatow was the destination of the Sunderlands, but the departure was from the Elbe.  Serves me right for trying to be a clever-bottom and jumping in!Embarrassed

 

Vell, Zaphod's just zis guy, you know?

   

TakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakkaTakka

 

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Sunday, May 16, 2021 3:08 PM

Hutch6390

 

 
GMorrison
Historic tidbit: which airforce ran flights in volume from which location that did not have a runway?

 

The RAF operated Sunderland flying boats from the river Elbe, near RAF Gatow, until the waterways they used to set down on froze over.  Ironically, they usually carried cargoes of salt!

 

We have a winner! Well done, sir.

I believe these also operated from the Wannsee.

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    July 2019
  • From: Vancouver, British Columbia
Posted by Bobstamp on Sunday, May 16, 2021 3:52 PM

The DC-6B was a “further development” of the DC-6, which was developed from the DC-4/C-54 Liftmaster that was used in the Berlin Airlift. It was among the last of the propliners to “rule the skies” until the first jetliners took to the air. 

Compared to both the DC-4 and the DC-6, the DC-6B was longer, faster, more powerful, more luxurious and had a higher service ceiling. With full tanks and less than a maximum load of passengers, it had a greater range than the other planes. Like the DC-6, it too was pressurized; the DC-4 was not pressurized. Most of the C-54s that survived the war were sold to airlines for conversion to passenger use; Douglas produce a few DC-4s after the war, but in 1946 the DC-6 became the company's money-maker.

Bob 

 

On the bench: A diorama to illustrate the crash of a Beech T-34B Mentor which I survived in 1962 (I'm using Minicraft's 1/48 model of the Mentor), and a Pegasus model of the submarine Nautilus of 20,000 Leagues Under the Seas fame. 

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Monday, May 17, 2021 5:31 PM

Hutch6390

Very nice job, Aggieman - maybe you can make a silk purse from a sow's ear!  However, I don't think I'll be adding one to the stash any time soonSmile

Oh, and I think the paint looks just fine - well done.

 

Thank you for your kind words, Hutch.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Monday, May 17, 2021 5:32 PM

jeaton01

It looks great to me, Stephen.  I agree it's a kit that requires a lot of patience, just from looking at the one I have.  A lot of parts in that box!

 

Thanks John!  Patience, definitely.  And not only a lot of parts in the box, but a lot of tightly-packed parts that even my sprue cutters had a hard time getting to without damaging the actual parts, had to use my XActo for many parts.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Monday, May 17, 2021 5:34 PM

GMorrison

Yes I've got one too in the stash. Santa Fe Railroad "Sky Chief". Fresh flowers, meat and produce to any airfield in the Western US in a refrigerated cargo aircraft.

The tail stand is a real thing. Douglas was a bit behind the curve on designing an aircraft with tripod landing gear that could load freight in the same way as the C-47 or their Curtiss competitor the C-46.

The Berlin Airlift is a war in itself for which too little attention is given.

Historic tidbit: which airforce ran flights in volume from which location that did not have a runway?

 

Bill

 

 

Agreed, Bill, the Berlin Air Lift just seems forgotten to history some times.

  • Member since
    January 2015
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by Aggieman on Monday, May 17, 2021 5:36 PM

mustang1989

Despite all the trouble it gave you it looks to have turned out well. I can see where the landing gear could get a bit tricky and it's a real shame that Revell didn't think about housing all the engine detail well under the cowlings but again....it looks like you made that all work out good. 

I did notice that the top "CARRIER" decal on the port side didn't adhere too well at the top but other than that you turned out a very good looking build bud.

 

Thanks for your kind words, Mustang.  Decals were the highlight of the kit, the CARRIER portion is entirely my fault for not noticing that.

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Hancock, Me USA
Posted by p38jl on Thursday, May 20, 2021 5:31 AM
Looking pretty good from the 207 ! nice job !

[Photobucket]

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.