SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

B-17 and B-52 Comparison

10862 views
32 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    September 2003
  • From: Philippines
Posted by nkm1416@info.com.ph on Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:13 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by toomanyslurpees

by the way my comments were origionaly in better context before I realized there was a second page here if that seemed alitte out of the blue. though now that you're talking engine noise, myself being twenty three can only wonder what a thousand bomber raid must have sounded like.
....and the sound of the tons of bombs raining from them!
  • Member since
    September 2003
Posted by DaveB.inVa on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:21 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by butchy

QUOTE: Originally posted by AJACKETSFAN

QUOTE: Originally posted by shrikes

Look at the Hawkeye, Orion, and Hercules. Of course, the B-17 had radial engines and today's planes use Turboprop engines...


Heck look at the Tuplov "Bear", it's the counterpart of the B-52 and it's still in service.

Yeh but I think the Bear is a much "newer" aircraft than the Buff..
A nice comparison would be the B 17 and B 29.. Big difference there and same time frames.


Kinda weird you mention the Tu-95 Bear and the B-29. They are very closely related! The Tu-95 is a direct descendent of the Tu-4 Bull which was a direct copy of the B-29. Their fuselage diameters are exactly the same and just everywhere you look on the Tu-95 you see B-29, from the nose all the way to the layout of the cockpit. Its really cool that the rudimentary elements of the B-29 still live on today in another country and that it does really well! The Bear is one of my favorite aircraft and it being related to the B-29 (my all time favorite) just makes it that much better.
Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make history.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, August 11, 2004 7:55 PM
Now we've really veered off, but if you're impressed by the legacy of the B-29, remember that its design was stretched to the B-50, to the C-97 and from there to the Guppy and from there to the Super Guppy. I wonder if all the old C-97 Super Guppies are grounded now? (Or the regular transports. There used to be several flying in and out of Miami IAP in late 80s, early 90s). And I used to watch the Super Guppy take off from NASA Houston not so long ago, and if it wasn't loaded, the rear wheels left the ground before the nose. I never, to this day, have been able to imagine how the designers knew that thing would fly. Especially with a big piece of a Titan missile or the Apollo Saturn on board. But at its heart (and tail and wings and, originally, engines) it's a B-29 all the way.
tom
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.