SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Joint Strike Fighter Group Build

3821 views
42 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    November 2005
Joint Strike Fighter Group Build
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 9, 2005 4:16 PM
This GB is just for JSf (Joint Strike Fighter).
Rules:
1.Must be a plane in the JSF Program
2.FA-22 'Raptor' is not in the Program

I Need a GB Patch


Members:
1.Willjanuary-Italeri 1/72 XF-32 JSF
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 9, 2005 10:14 PM
There are kits of the JSF? I didn't know they even decided on what it looked like.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:29 PM
Yes Itarlei makes some and Revell makes the X-35 JSF
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 5:33 AM
Hey will, excellent idea! I've been wanted to add the JSF to my list of unbuilt kits for quite a while.

I was kind of hoping to wait until there were some more offerings out there (other than the italeri and revell kits), mostly to get a production F-35 kit rather than the prototype.

Ok, so if i can find one and am satisfied with the kit, I'll do an F-35.

But even if I can't I'll see what I can come up with for you in terms of a badge.

Btw, my brother has started a super hornet GB for early next year. Perhaps that might interest you ?

http://www.finescale.com/fsm/community/forum/topic.asp?page=1&TOPIC_ID=48905
  • Member since
    December 2004
  • From: Haninge, Sweden
Posted by Gilmund on Monday, September 12, 2005 5:34 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Comrade Sergei

There are kits of the JSF? I didn't know they even decided on what it looked like.


Man... did you live in a closet the last couple of years!?Wink [;)]
- Johan Byberg -</font id="blue"> "Who´s the most foolish, the fool or the fool who follows?"</font id="size1">
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 12, 2005 5:40 PM
O god , i am SO up to it in GBs, BUT I GOTTA JOIN THIS ONE!

Put me down, but i cant start for a month or 2, And ill make the patch

Update:

Here is your patch ^_^



URL: http://img353.imageshack.us/img353/5776/jsfgb20054bh.jpg
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:02 PM
I already posted one O.o
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Modeling anything with "MARINES" on the side.
Posted by AH1Wsnake on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:03 PM
Sounds like a cool idea. What 48th scale kits are available? Would this be strictly builds of the current prototype, or maybe throw in a little "what-if" and do some different camo schemes and foreign-user markings as well?

Oh, and watch your language, "sarge."

 

"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and those who have met them in battle. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion."
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 2:50 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by AH1Wsnake

Oh, and watch your language, "sarge."


Ok, one, you can quit putting my name in quotes, and two, i said ONE word. I know you have a grudge against me for that thread, but Its all history.
  • Member since
    August 2004
  • From: Nowhere. (Long Island)
Posted by Tankmaster7 on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:59 PM
That's tru sarge, he could, but he doesn't have to. Smile [:)] I don't think any of the JSF kits out right now are terribly accurate- most of the info is still classified, so I imagine cockpit detail is fictitious.
-Tanky Welcome to the United States of America, a subsidiary of Exxon Mobil Corporation, in partnership with Halliburton. Security for your constitutional rights provided by Blackwater International.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 13, 2005 8:07 PM
Probably are, but then again you COULD try to use a current generation panel to at least make it look decent. Im probably going to install an FA-18 or F-15 one in mine if there is no detail.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:23 AM
sorry sarge .... no offense intended ... just providing will with what i said i would.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:03 PM
I wasnt intending to Make him use mine or anything. He just picks what he likes i suppose Smile [:)]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:36 PM
Well lets have a vote ok! Burn16v thanks you really gave us some choises.
Number 1

Number 2

And Nuber 3
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:38 PM
No offense but...........................I go with Number 1
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 6:45 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by Sarge4109

QUOTE: Originally posted by AH1Wsnake

Oh, and watch your language, "sarge."


Ok, one, you can quit putting my name in quotes, and two, i said ONE word. I know you have a grudge against me for that thread, but Its all history.


What happened ''Sarge"?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 6:27 AM
i must say that i too am somewhat intrigued by all these veiled references to some "that thread ... history"
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 15, 2005 2:09 PM
Its a thread that i made, and something in it disagreed with his polotical view.

Back on topic, i think #1 is better than mine, but I think the text is to plain.
  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Modeling anything with "MARINES" on the side.
Posted by AH1Wsnake on Friday, September 16, 2005 12:47 AM
QUOTE: Originally posted by "Sarge"4109

Its a thread that i made, and something in it disagreed with his polotical view.

It had nothing to do with political views. It was a matter of decorum. Degrading insults against the Commander in Chief are inexcusable, no matter what the political party. It's a dead (and deleted) issue. Let's keep the JSF thing going here......

 

"There are only two kinds of people that understand Marines: Marines and those who have met them in battle. Everyone else has a second-hand opinion."
  • Member since
    April 2003
  • From: South Carolina
Posted by jlwilliams on Friday, September 16, 2005 6:41 PM
Start and end dates?
J. Lee Williams 2007 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build 2008 New Year's Resolution: Complete a group build on time You load 16 tons and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt! In my stash gallery: http://pics.jamesjweg.com/gallery/3989211
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, September 16, 2005 11:18 PM
Yes, im quite curious about the dates to
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 17, 2005 2:43 AM
Looks as if Tamiya makes a 1/72 X-35 kit #60767.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Monday, September 19, 2005 8:12 AM
So, is this build going to go anywhere? I think it's a good GB with a solid focus. I may even be able to participate! Wink [;)]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, September 20, 2005 11:35 AM
ClumsyModeler, I'm afraid I have some bad news for you regarding Tamiya kit #60767.
As with many of their 1/72 kits (the WW2 stuff is usually genuine Tamiya), and virtually all kits in the Warbird Series, these kits are not manufactured by Tamiya but are reboxed with Tamiya branding. The usual suspect for the majority of the Warbird Series is Italeri.

HLJ are honest about the true origins of kits wherever possible, and their write-up for #60767 ends with:

Produced in Italy for Tamiya.

which means "manufactured by Italeri and reboxed by Tamiya".

here is the URL if you want to have a look for yourself (a few photos of a completed kit too):

http://www.hlj.com/product/TAM60767

I'm not sure of the purity of origin for the Revell kit either .... it may also be a reboxed Italeri. However, if it is a genuine Revell mould, its not really much of a decision is it?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 22, 2005 4:58 AM
Bah! Thanks for the heads up! Guess I won't buy it then. Still need some dates for this build. It'll be interesting having everyone build the same exact kit, no?
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 22, 2005 6:05 AM
Hi Guys,

Sorry for the delay in responding to your feedback about the badge contribution .... its been a hectic two weeks at work.

Anyway, I've finally fiddled around a bit during what passes for my lunchbreak, and put together some variation on the first option, using various opaque backgrounds to get the text to stand out a bit more.

Sarge, if you were referring to the font itself when you said it was "too plain", please let me know what you think would work better, and i'll make the changes and post another sample. I was going for maximum clarity and usable height within the width, hence Impact it was.

http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5a.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5b.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5c.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5d.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5e40.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5e50.jpg
http://www.burn.za.org/model/willjanuary/JSF5e60.jpg
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Thursday, September 22, 2005 5:09 PM
Last badge is nice... I like the text, very crisp.Thumbs Up [tup]
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:25 AM
#3 is pretty cool ^_^

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.