SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Academy M4A2 Sherman First Look

1086 views
17 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    January 2003
Academy M4A2 Sherman First Look
Posted by shermanfreak on Friday, March 12, 2004 4:23 PM
Had a little time to kill this morning so I wandered into my LHS (the one who can't seem to get it into his head that if he has Shermans on the shelf, I will buy them). Much to my delight, there was the new Academy M4A2 Sherman sitting there waiting to come home with me.

So here's a quick first look review of what I see in this package.

The model is of a late version M4A2 (76) with vertical volute suspension.
The detailing is sharp with no visible flash whatsoever. The kit is moulded in O.D. green styrene and the tracks are "rubber band" style T-51 rubber block and are very flexible compared with the Italeri offerings. Not as many "extras" as I've become used to with other Academy offerings but this kit still offers the choice of road wheels (either open spoke or pressed steel). The pressed steel roadwheels are very well done with details on both the front and back which has been an ongoing problem with past Sherman kits. The kit includes markings for the Soviet Red Army who recieved the lion's share of this version.

As with any kit, there are a couple of pitfalls.
Number 1, the gun barrel. The 76mm barrel has a step in it that shouldn't be there. This has been an all too common mistake made with 76mm Sherman kits and it's about time one of the manufacturers got this corrected. Italeri, DML and now Academy have all made this very same mistake. Seems like they've all got some stocks in Jordi Rubio to keep this little company selling AM barrels.
Number 2, the upper rear of the hull. The M4A2 had a sharper angled rear hull than the M4A3. This kit does that but goes a little too far and almost makes the rear plate vertical. Close, but no cigar. It will take a little "adjusting" with an exacto blade to correct this.

DML is also supposed to be releasing the same model this year some time and both companies have announced and 75mm version too.

Even with these glaring errors, the kit is a welcome additon to my collection and is highly recommended for any other Sherman efficianados.
Happy Modelling and God Bless Robert
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 12, 2004 4:29 PM
Thanks for the review, Robert!

I will keep an eye open for it.
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 12, 2004 4:33 PM
Thanks for the info. I'm trying to decide what sherman kit to buy. What sherman kit in 1/35th scale would you recomend I build. It would be my second sherman (to save everyone from cringing at my description of how I destroyed it when I got fed up with it I don't want to say what happened to it !Angry [:(!]Banged Head [banghead]SoapBox [soapbox]). Anyway the information helps on the decision shermanfreak. Thanks!
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 12, 2004 5:03 PM
Yes, It seems to be a very nice kit. I don't want to rub it in...but...I got mine for about $16 US at the LHS here in Korea about 2 months agoBig Smile [:D] Now if I could just find a store that sells acrylic paint Angry [:(!] Oh well! I agree with Mr. Freak, looks very nice in the box.
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by shermanfreak on Friday, March 12, 2004 6:02 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by ArmorMaster
I'm trying to decide what sherman kit to buy. What sherman kit in 1/35th scale would you recomend I build.


The kit that I just about always recommend for a "first" Sherman is Tamiya's M4. Even with it's mistakes, IMO it's still the cream of the crop.
Happy Modelling and God Bless Robert
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Friday, March 12, 2004 6:55 PM
We need pics please.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Newport News VA
Posted by Buddho on Friday, March 12, 2004 7:51 PM
Thanks for the review , Robert.

Regards, Dan

  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by shermanfreak on Friday, March 12, 2004 8:14 PM
Eric - instead of me taking pics, here's a link to Terry Ashely's review on PMMS, he includes a set of pics of all the sprues.

http://pmms.webace.com.au/reviews/vehicles/academy/acd13010.htm
Happy Modelling and God Bless Robert
  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Friday, March 12, 2004 8:57 PM
Is that any Tamiya Sherman Robert? I think I would like to build one in the future, so I was wondering the same thing as ArmorMaster.

Matt

Just had a look at your site, by the way. You really are a Shermanfreak.
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Exit 7a NJ Turnpike
Posted by RAF120 on Friday, March 12, 2004 9:42 PM
Thanks for the review Robert. That's another one added to my want list
Trevor Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by shermanfreak on Friday, March 12, 2004 10:30 PM
Matt - no it's the new Academy kit. It looks like it will be a fairly stright forward build depending on how far you want to go with the corrections.

I still recommend the Tamiya M4 as a first time Sherman build, no one can beat their engineering.
Happy Modelling and God Bless Robert
  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Upstate NY
Posted by Build22 on Saturday, March 13, 2004 7:59 AM

Sherm,

Thanks for the info.


Jim [IMG]
  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posted by zokissima on Saturday, March 13, 2004 12:04 PM
Thanks for the review Robert. I've yet to build a single WWII sherman. I only built the academy super sherman, and really loved it. So maybe I'll pick up the tamiya M4 you suggest. Gotta have a sherman in my collection. Which of the two kits comes with more extras, such as stowage, etc?
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Saturday, March 13, 2004 1:08 PM
Thanks for the link Robert. It looks intriguing. Doesn't have those DML tracks that scare me off. Maybe they'll come out with a Firefly. Tongue [:P]

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Saturday, March 13, 2004 2:57 PM
Thanks for the help.
  • Member since
    January 2003
Posted by shermanfreak on Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:11 PM
QUOTE: Originally posted by zokissima
Which of the two kits comes with more extras, such as stowage, etc?


Both the Tamiya M4 and M4A3 come with the same number of spares I believe.
Happy Modelling and God Bless Robert
  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: NE Georgia
Posted by Keyworth on Saturday, March 13, 2004 5:47 PM
Robert, thanks for the info. Looks like I may have to build a Sherman or two-besides the plethora on the bench already.
"There's no problem that can't be solved with a suitable application of high explosives"
  • Member since
    February 2003
  • From: Tochigi, Japan
Posted by J-Hulk on Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:10 AM
Thanks for the review, Robert!
I wonder why all those companies missed on the 76mm gun tube.
Must be like you said: Stock in Jordi Rubio!!
~Brian
JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.