SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

"The Hunters GB" (2/1/08 to 6/1/08)

98572 views
1237 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: LaValle, Wisconsin
Posted by Hermesminiatures on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 1:06 PM
Well, the SU-122 destroyed some tanks, and proved a threat to the German heavies. However, that was only as a stop-gap measure until the SU-85 arrived. If the SU-122, as an HE-firing assault gun would qualify, then so would the German self-propelled howitzers Wespe and Hummel. They both carried AP ammo and destroyed their fair share of Soviet tanks, but since they were neither designed as a tank hunter nor ended up becoming a highly succesful one, they don't qualify. And I don't think the SU-122 does either. The ISU-152, on the other hand, was designed as an assault gun, but soon became know as "Beast Killer" and was relegated to an anti-tank role. That's the only way I think an assault gun or SPG will qualify.

Jonathan

For every modeling technique that works, I have three that don't.

  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 12:29 PM
  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 11:10 AM
 Carves wrote:

Wow.... this GB sure took off  fast.

19 people has joined Thumbs Up [tup]

Should be fun fun fun Party [party]

---
Ben

I think the masses have been waiting for something to begin.

This should get me off my lazy end and back to the bench. I've been slaving around the house for the past 2 weeks. Yuck [yuck]

 

 

 

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    April 2014
Posted by Carves on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 11:02 AM

Wow.... this GB sure took off  fast.

19 people has joined Thumbs Up [tup]

Should be fun fun fun Party [party]

---
Ben

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: NJ 07073
Posted by archangel571 on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 11:01 AM
 dupes wrote:
 jthurston wrote:

OK, here's the hunters in my stash:

DML Marder II, StuG III G, Nashorn, Jagdpanther (early) (x2 for some reason); Tamiya 110 M8.

So I'll build one of the jagdpanthers, prolly either OOB or with only minor AM (maybe a barrel, etc).

Thurston - I'm sure I could help you lighten your stash-load of that "extra" JP if necessary...Wink [;)]

Watch out for that pair of sink mark infested treads though, providing it's the older Imperial series kit (9015 i believe).  My plan to have a lil more TLC for an old kit like this went out the window the minute I saw those tracklinks.

-=Ryan=- Too many kits... so little free time. MadDocWorks
  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:49 AM
 jthurston wrote:

OK, here's the hunters in my stash:

DML Marder II, StuG III G, Nashorn, Jagdpanther (early) (x2 for some reason); Tamiya 110 M8.

So I'll build one of the jagdpanthers, prolly either OOB or with only minor AM (maybe a barrel, etc).

Thurston - I'm sure I could help you lighten your stash-load of that "extra" JP if necessary...Wink [;)]

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:48 AM
 dupes wrote:
 tigerman wrote:

Oh, you're going to be sent to the corner Mister.......Clown [:o)]

You make some good points. This is getting complicted isn't it. The thin-skinned vehicles would be better suited for ambush, but even the heavier ones did the same. Hmmmm. I would omit the halftracks from the list. To me they don't fit the characteristics of a TD hunter. Sorry to all. Disapprove [V]

Hahahahahha....sorry for being a pain. Just trying to clarify. Big Smile [:D]

So then the edited list (Hermes compilation) would look something like this...?

German
StuG III Ausf F, G w/75mm StuK 42
StuG IV
Marder series
SdKfz 251/22
SdKfz 250/10
Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzer
Jadpanzer IV series
E-10/E-20
Hornisse/Nashorn
Ferdinand/Elefant
Jagdpanzer V Jagdpanther
Jagdpanzer VI Jagdtiger 

US
M3 GMC
M6 Fargo GMC
M10 Wolverine GMC
M18 Hellcat GMC
M36 Jackson GMC 

Russia
SU-76
SU-85
SU-100
ISU-122
ISU-152 

Great Britain
Firefly
Archer
Achilles
Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger

 

That's a nice compliation. Still plenty of choices, though German will be dominant. 

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:46 AM
 tigerman wrote:

Oh, you're going to be sent to the corner Mister.......Clown [:o)]

You make some good points. This is getting complicted isn't it. The thin-skinned vehicles would be better suited for ambush, but even the heavier ones did the same. Hmmmm. I would omit the halftracks from the list. To me they don't fit the characteristics of a TD hunter. Sorry to all. Disapprove [V]

Hahahahahha....sorry for being a pain. Just trying to clarify. Big Smile [:D]

So then the edited list (Hermes compilation) would look something like this...?

German
StuG III Ausf F, G w/75mm StuK 42
StuG IV
Marder series
SdKfz 251/22
SdKfz 250/10
Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzer
Jadpanzer IV series
E-10/E-20
Hornisse/Nashorn
Ferdinand/Elefant
Jagdpanzer V Jagdpanther
Jagdpanzer VI Jagdtiger 

US
M3 GMC
M6 Fargo GMC
M10 Wolverine GMC
M18 Hellcat GMC
M36 Jackson GMC 

Russia
SU-76
SU-85
SU-100
ISU-122
ISU-152 

Great Britain
Firefly
Archer
Achilles
Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger

 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:38 AM
 Carves wrote:
 STUG61 wrote:

Eric I'll be doing the AFV club Achilles Mk.II.c.

I'll save all the Stugs in the stash for later!!Wink [;)]

Hey I have a StuG in my stash too. Maybe we can wait until StuG GB come around.

---
Ben

It's was done about 3 years ago. I lost the badge. I'd certainly go for another round. I have the Dragon G late with all my goods........waiting. 

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:34 AM
 dupes wrote:
 tigerman wrote:
 Hermesminiatures wrote:

The 251/22 was a very effective ambusher, and destroyed many allied tanks in Normandy. They were a great annoyance to deal with because the quickness of the 251 enabled the anti-tank crew to fire-and-run, something that couldn't be done with the standard PaK 40. Allied tank crews actually found the Marders easier to deal with becuase of their poorer mobility and higher sillouette. The 251/22 is in pretty much the same class as the lightly-armored Marders - an effective ambusher, but it has no chance in a shootout.

If you do decide not to include the 251/22, what about the US M3 75mm GMC? Obviously not a Tiger-killer, but it saw some success against the early Panzers in North Africa.

Just my two cents. And it's your GB, so whatever is fineWink [;)]

Ugh........Okay this is getting tricky. Seemingly anything with an AT on a chassis qualifies to some point. I guess the 251/22 would be good to go. So I assume the Demag w/50mm would too and that funky RSO tractor with 75mm.

Heh...I shouldn't have gone digging around. Wink [;)]

I'm not saying that any of this has to qualify - just trying to figure out what a Tank Destroyer really is. If your definition of what a "Hunter" is differs from that, I have no problem with the list getting chopped down a bit...your later examples especially enforcing the idea. Demag/JagdTiger certainly don't seeeeem like they would be in the same "class". 

Got 'til the first of February to figure it out, anyway. Big Smile [:D]

Oh, you're going to be sent to the corner Mister.......Clown [:o)]

You make some good points. This is getting complicted isn't it. The thin-skinned vehicles would be better suited for ambush, but even the heavier ones did the same. Hmmmm. I would omit the halftracks from the list. To me they don't fit the characteristics of a TD hunter. Sorry to all. Disapprove [V]

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posted by zokissima on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 10:13 AM
Wow, this GB just took off. Can you believe, I don't have a single, not even one, TD in the stash.
  • Member since
    April 2014
Posted by Carves on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 9:47 AM
 STUG61 wrote:

Eric I'll be doing the AFV club Achilles Mk.II.c.

I'll save all the Stugs in the stash for later!!Wink [;)]

Hey I have a StuG in my stash too. Maybe we can wait until StuG GB come around.

---
Ben

  • Member since
    January 2005
  • From: Meeeechigan!!!
Posted by STUG61 on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 9:37 AM

Eric I'll be doing the AFV club Achilles Mk.II.c.

I'll save all the Stugs in the stash for later!!Wink [;)]

Smile! It makes people nervous!! Andy
  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by jthurston on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 8:53 AM

OK, here's the hunters in my stash:

DML Marder II, StuG III G, Nashorn, Jagdpanther (early) (x2 for some reason); Tamiya 110 M8.

So I'll build one of the jagdpanthers, prolly either OOB or with only minor AM (maybe a barrel, etc).

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 7:26 AM
 tigerman wrote:
 Hermesminiatures wrote:

The 251/22 was a very effective ambusher, and destroyed many allied tanks in Normandy. They were a great annoyance to deal with because the quickness of the 251 enabled the anti-tank crew to fire-and-run, something that couldn't be done with the standard PaK 40. Allied tank crews actually found the Marders easier to deal with becuase of their poorer mobility and higher sillouette. The 251/22 is in pretty much the same class as the lightly-armored Marders - an effective ambusher, but it has no chance in a shootout.

If you do decide not to include the 251/22, what about the US M3 75mm GMC? Obviously not a Tiger-killer, but it saw some success against the early Panzers in North Africa.

Just my two cents. And it's your GB, so whatever is fineWink [;)]

Ugh........Okay this is getting tricky. Seemingly anything with an AT on a chassis qualifies to some point. I guess the 251/22 would be good to go. So I assume the Demag w/50mm would too and that funky RSO tractor with 75mm.

Heh...I shouldn't have gone digging around. Wink [;)]

I'm not saying that any of this has to qualify - just trying to figure out what a Tank Destroyer really is. If your definition of what a "Hunter" is differs from that, I have no problem with the list getting chopped down a bit...your later examples especially enforcing the idea. Demag/JagdTiger certainly don't seeeeem like they would be in the same "class". 

Got 'til the first of February to figure it out, anyway. Big Smile [:D]

  • Member since
    June 2007
Posted by Labour In Vain on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 6:25 AM

I would like to see if I can meet the deadline this time, I stil have not recived the tower to my T-34:
Dragon #6320, StuG.III Ausf.G Early Production

Thank You

Avatar © David Byrden 2005 http://Tiger1.info/
  • Member since
    April 2014
Posted by Carves on Tuesday, January 8, 2008 12:55 AM

Hey Eric,

I'm in !

Sign me up for Dragon 1/35 SU-100

---
Ben

  • Member since
    June 2005
  • From: NJ 07073
Posted by archangel571 on Monday, January 7, 2008 11:54 PM
kul GB.  But i am not joining in anything this time.  Every time I enter a GB I somehow end up with a half finished project.  (Usually due to me turning into a workaholic and always ending up doing a lot of weekend OT since certain coworker can't pull his weight.)  This time I am going to half build it and finish trimming all the seam lines off the parts, then submit the topic of my build.  That way I can build the other half during the GB...  1/2 + 1/2 = a finished kit!!!  That's if it is okay with you eric.
-=Ryan=- Too many kits... so little free time. MadDocWorks
  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: n/w indiana
Posted by some assembly required on Monday, January 7, 2008 8:55 PM
i remember kmc making a conversion for a 75 mounted m3, i think warriors bought the molds/rights reciently. i think it was previed in fsm's new kit list a while back.

  • Member since
    July 2003
  • From: Ozarks of Arkansas
Posted by diggeraone on Monday, January 7, 2008 8:34 PM
Eric to let you know that both build that I would are Dragon kits.No Tamaya this round.Digger
Put all your trust in the Lord,do not put confidence in man.PSALM 118:8 We are in the buisness to do the impossible..G.S.Patton
  • Member since
    May 2006
  • From: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posted by Brews on Monday, January 7, 2008 7:40 PM

With due respect, I believe that the SU-122 would qualify.

http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=60&Itemid=45&lang=en

  • Member since
    February 2005
  • From: Nashotah, WI
Posted by Glamdring on Monday, January 7, 2008 5:07 PM

I really wish that there was a kit of the GMC M3, that's still my favorite TD of the war....

Dragon, hear my prayers with the upcoming M3 release!

Robert 

"I can't get ahead no matter how hard I try, I'm gettin' really good at barely gettin' by"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Monday, January 7, 2008 4:53 PM
 dupes wrote:

EDIT - how about the Hetzer? Isn't it's classification something like Jagdpanzer 38(t)?

Correct. Never an official name, much like the Gepard.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Monday, January 7, 2008 4:43 PM
 Hermesminiatures wrote:

The 251/22 was a very effective ambusher, and destroyed many allied tanks in Normandy. They were a great annoyance to deal with because the quickness of the 251 enabled the anti-tank crew to fire-and-run, something that couldn't be done with the standard PaK 40. Allied tank crews actually found the Marders easier to deal with becuase of their poorer mobility and higher sillouette. The 251/22 is in pretty much the same class as the lightly-armored Marders - an effective ambusher, but it has no chance in a shootout.

If you do decide not to include the 251/22, what about the US M3 75mm GMC? Obviously not a Tiger-killer, but it saw some success against the early Panzers in North Africa.

Just my two cents. And it's your GB, so whatever is fineWink [;)]

Ugh........Okay this is getting tricky. Seemingly anything with an AT on a chassis qualifies to some point. I guess the 251/22 would be good to go. So I assume the Demag w/50mm would too and that funky RSO tractor with 75mm.

Glad to have to you JT.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: LaValle, Wisconsin
Posted by Hermesminiatures on Monday, January 7, 2008 3:54 PM

The 251/22 was a very effective ambusher, and destroyed many allied tanks in Normandy. They were a great annoyance to deal with because the quickness of the 251 enabled the anti-tank crew to fire-and-run, something that couldn't be done with the standard PaK 40. Allied tank crews actually found the Marders easier to deal with becuase of their poorer mobility and higher sillouette. The 251/22 is in pretty much the same class as the lightly-armored Marders - an effective ambusher, but it has no chance in a shootout.

If you do decide not to include the 251/22, what about the US M3 75mm GMC? Obviously not a Tiger-killer, but it saw some success against the early Panzers in North Africa.

Just my two cents. And it's your GB, so whatever is fineWink [;)]

Jonathan

For every modeling technique that works, I have three that don't.

  • Member since
    October 2004
  • From: Katy, TX
Posted by jthurston on Monday, January 7, 2008 3:20 PM

OOOHHH!!! Count me in!!!!! (jumping up and down)

 Dragon Jagdpanther, I think. I'll check my shelves tonight and verify.

 

Shoot. And I was trying so hard to resist...

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Monday, January 7, 2008 3:03 PM

That's a good list Hermes. We'll allow the Firefly unless someone comes a valid reason not to.

About the 251 w/75mm. That's borderline. I doubt they would be hunting down armor, but rather more of a support role. Just my 2 cents.

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: LaValle, Wisconsin
Posted by Hermesminiatures on Monday, January 7, 2008 2:25 PM

I did forget the Hetzer. WIll add it to the list...

The SU-122 is a T-34 chassis, while the ISU-122 is based off the IS-II chassis. The SU-122 carries a short-barreled howitzer, while the ISU-122 is armed with a long 122mm AT gun. 

 

SU-122:

ISU-122:

 

Jonathan

For every modeling technique that works, I have three that don't.

  • Member since
    November 2006
  • From: Coastal Maine
Posted by dupes on Monday, January 7, 2008 1:54 PM

Certainly seems to be a well thought out and comprehensive list to me. Wink [;)]

EDIT - how about the Hetzer? Isn't it's classification something like Jagdpanzer 38(t)?

 

Semi off-topic - what's the difference between an SU-122 and an ISU-122? 

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: LaValle, Wisconsin
Posted by Hermesminiatures on Monday, January 7, 2008 1:49 PM

The Firefly carried no MG and very little HE ammo, making it useless as an infantry support tank. Its role was exclusively that of tank hunter, hiding behind cover and waiting for the big cats to show themselves, then picking them off at long range.

IMO, the criteria should be simple: anything that was bred as a dedicated tank hunter should be allowed. I don't think it would be fair to exclude the Firefly, since it carries a dedicated anti-tank gun and was the king of the allied TD's. It's essentially a slower, heavier armored version of the Achilles, because it carries the exact same armament - it just has a top on its turret.

Something that totes a big gun but was designed as a main battle tank or assualt gun would not qualify - like some of the StuG and SU series. So only the StuGs with the StuK 42 75mm would qualify, and while the SU-76 , SU-85 and SU-100 are TD's, the SU-122 is not.

In the case of a multi-purpose vehicle like the ISU-152, I'm not sure. It was designed as an assualt gun, but soon became known as "beast killer" becuase of its effectiveness against the German heavy tanks. I'd probably include it as well. 

 

Here is a list:

German

StuG III Ausf F, G w/75mm StuK 42

StuG IV 

Marder series

SdKfz 251/22

SdKfz 250/10

Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzer 

Jadpanzer IV series

E-10/E-20 

Hornisse/Nashorn 

Ferdinand/Elefant 

Jagdpanzer V Jagdpanther

Jagdpanzer VI Jagdtiger 

US 

M3 GMC

M6 Fargo GMC 

M10 Wolverine GMC

M18 Hellcat GMC 

M36 Jackson GMC 

Russia 

SU-76

SU-85 

SU-100

ISU-122

ISU-152 

Great Britan

Firefly

Archer

Achilles 

Cruiser Mk VIII Challenger

 

 

Some examples of inelligible vehicles would be:

Tiger I & II

Panther

Panzer IV (even 75mm H models)

Early StuG III's with short guns

Sherman M4A3(76)

Super Pershing 

SU-152 

Comet 

 

Just my thoughts... 

 

Jonathan

For every modeling technique that works, I have three that don't.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.