IA Novice wrote: |
Doog, I was reading Bill's comments. I agree with him if we are talking about a tank shell, but what about a panzer faust or panzer shrek? |
|
Hey IAnovice; yeah, a panzerschreck might probably leave that type of damage, but I'm not too worried about it; it's purely "artistic license", as is so much of this tank. The whole "shell hit" thing seems to have met with mostly approval, both here and over at Armorama, so I think I'l leave it.
I think it's important to not lose sight of personal touches to models, whether or not they are 100% technically correct. I mean, I wouldn't have added a Pak 40 as a secondary armament or a set of PZ IV schurzen on rails to something like this, but a little "what if" on a spare track is within "plausible", perhaps?
Who knows--it could have been like a Russian RPG or something? Hey, if we're going to postulate a tank like this at the end of the war, hypothetically, anything is possible??
Madmike--I built up the 1/72 version of this, pretty much OOB; I liked the look of the kit; I just wish I did the hull corrections, but in that scale they're not that noticeable.
Hey, I know you like 1/72 (like me ); did you see that the new "Armor" magazine is all 1/72 builds? I just picked it up and it's COOOOL!!!!!