SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

Allure of a Battleship Loser ?

7523 views
46 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    June 2010
  • From: Austin, TX
Posted by DoogsATX on Monday, March 14, 2011 3:44 PM

During my pyro years, my friends and I would wage "naval battles" by loading up cheap model ships with M80s, cracked open roman candles, and gunpowder from various firecrackers, then shooting more roman candles at them. 

Good times.

On the Bench: 1/32 Trumpeter P-47 | 1/32 Hasegawa Bf 109G | 1/144 Eduard MiG-21MF x2

On Deck:  1/350 HMS Dreadnought

Blog/Completed Builds: doogsmodels.com

 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:11 AM

p38jl

 I think alot of it had to do with their PRE war presence..Before WW2.. the Battleship was THE ship of the fleet and the long reach of that countries diplomacy.. They were feared and dreaded... untill their demise..

In fact they were a primary instrument of foreign policy in the colonial era. And why the IJN made a fatal mistake targeting them.

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 12:16 AM

Manstein's revenge

 

 bondoman:

 

It's an interesting question, but I would put it in the realm of the question of why mass cavalry charges are no longer effective, and therefore, why modelers recreate Picton, the Old Guard or the Scots Greys at Waterloo.

 

 

 

...haven't seen any of those modeled in a loooooong while...Wink

 

Because you don't go to the same Scottish bars as I do. There's a whole sub culture of folks who collect and wargame with Airfix 1/72 rubber men. Point taken however. Maybe it's that part of our culture that likes watching car wrecks.

  • Member since
    November 2005
Posted by Anonymous on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:18 PM

bondoman

 Manstein's revenge:

 

 bondoman:

 

It's an interesting question, but I would put it in the realm of the question of why mass cavalry charges are no longer effective, and therefore, why modelers recreate Picton, the Old Guard or the Scots Greys at Waterloo.

 

 

 

...haven't seen any of those modeled in a loooooong while...Wink

 

 

Because you don't go to the same Scottish bars as I do. There's a whole sub culture of folks who collect and wargame with Airfix 1/72 rubber men. Point taken however. Maybe it's that part of our culture that likes watching car wrecks.

Some of the best figure modelers in the hobby, such as She Paine and Bill Horan, have done these types of dios and shadow boxes, but for the mainstream you don't see them done as much...when they are done well they are breathtaking...then again, dios in general, aren't built nearly as much either...

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:03 PM

bondoman
And why the IJN made a fatal mistake targeting them.

They didn't really target them. At Pearl they wanted the carriers AND the battleships. The same was true; they wanted to strike the carriers first, but warships overall. So instead of targeting supply lines the way we did, they focused on the warships, including both carriers and battleships.

Their fatal mistake was in taking on an enemy who could rapidly out-produce and out-equip them.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: San Antonio
Posted by MAJ Mike on Tuesday, March 15, 2011 9:11 PM

tigerman

 

 

Or lighter-fluid..........Whistling

Gasoline from a Windex bottle at the USS North Carolina.  Its a wonder any of us still live.

 

 

 "I'd "I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct."

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!"

  • Member since
    March 2005
  • From: West Virginia, USA
Posted by mfsob on Thursday, March 17, 2011 7:07 PM

"Its a wonder any of us still live."

Yep - MY favorite holiday, the one I saved up for and looked forward to, wasn't Christmas, no siree, not by a long shot. It was the Fourth of July!

 

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 6:09 PM

I have read this thread with interest. There has been much said in a positive note . I must add this though . If you build a model of ,sayt he BISMARK, what,s the problem? A whole nation shuddered to think what havoc she might stir up if she got loose for long . The sheer firepower of these vessels coupled with , in some cases sheer beauty of design for the type cannot be debated . Take liners , sure there are way more models of TITANIC and NONE of her successful sisters OR the ANDREA DORIA and the NORMANDIE (which by the way was deemed the most beautiful liner EVER built !!) That in the forties ! You build per your interest of , ONE , the design . TWO , the sheer firepower. THREE the history and FOUR because this is what you like to do , plain and simple . Enjoy whatever you wish to build , that is why it is called the "HOBBY"of ,model ship building .         tankerbuilder 

  • Member since
    July 2006
  • From: Philippines
Posted by constructor on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 9:54 PM

Maybe you have answered all your questions. Maybe it's everything you mentioned about these ships. The mere fact that they were all part of history attracts us modellers to them. Practically all the WWII ships have in one way or another been part of of one's life. I come across modellers looking for an unheard of ship they want to build because their grandfather served in it. Maybe thier father died duirng a sea battle or have parts of the ships that sunk the Bismark. I built ships because I can identify with them as part of history. Maybe your neighbor's father served on the USS Hornet and mentioned them while telling stories about the great war. Maybe it's one of them. Maybe it's all of them. 

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington, DC
Posted by TomZ2 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:45 PM

The last ship I built was a scratch-built ship-in-a-bottle (if anyone needs an empirical definition of “masochist”, build one). It was a submerged submarine.

Occasional factual, grammatical, or spelling variations are inherent to this thesis and should not be considered as defects, as they enhance the individuality and character of this document.

  • Member since
    February 2011
  • From: San Antonio
Posted by MAJ Mike on Tuesday, May 17, 2011 10:49 PM

One of my ex-students had a grandfather on the USS Maryland at Pearl Harbor.  I could that as a reason for building one.

 

 

 "I'd "I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct."

"Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc!"

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Rain USA, Vancouver WA
Posted by tigerman on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 12:09 AM

MAJ Mike

One of my ex-students had a grandfather on the USS Maryland at Pearl Harbor.  I could that as a reason for building one.

My favorite class of US BB's. Yes

   http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y269/wing_nut_5o/PANZERJAGERGB.jpg

 Eric 

  • Member since
    March 2007
  • From: Carmel, CA
Posted by bondoman on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 12:37 AM

When Battleships gathered together, the tendency was to get slaughtered like pigs.

Tsushima, Pearl Harbor, Taranto, Leyte.

Sort of a (Scottish play that cannot be named) deal.

 

  • Member since
    January 2007
  • From: Richmond, Va.
Posted by Pavlvs on Wednesday, May 18, 2011 1:32 AM

Shipbuilderjake

I'm probably going to be opening up "Pandora's Box", but I've never understood spending a good chunk of change on ships like HMS Hood, Bismark, Tirpitz, IJN Yamato and such ? Hood was sunk in less than 20min, Bismark was crippled by a WWI relic, Tirpitz sat in a fjord, Yamato was the only one that went out fighting after sitting around in Tokyo Bay for most of the war. I've just never understood the allure of building one of these kits. Perhaps my youth prevents me from understanding the true greatness of those ships ? What is it that gets everyone going on these kits ? The guns ? The size ? The armor ? Just looking for some better insight ?

You raise an interesting point.  I am building a 1/200 model of Titanic and Arizona in the same scale.  Both were famous for sinking as was Bismark and PT-109 and Hood.  These are just some of the ships that became famous for dying.  You are correct but as was also said, if you only built winners, you would narrow the selection considerably.  Even the Iowa class of BBs would be considered losers by some in that they were obsolete when they were built thanks to Pearl Harbor which forced the hand of the US Navy to go with Carriers as the front line ship as Billy Mitchell predicted when he sunk the Ostfriesland.  But losers or not, their beauty and power are unmistakable and that is why I think they are so popular.  It could be argued that their sinking brought the historian's attention and their beauty kept his attention.2 cents

Deus in minutiae est. Fr. Pavlvs

On the Bench: 1:200 Titanic; 1:16 CSA Parrott rifle and Limber

On Deck: 1/200 Arizona.

Recently Completed: 1/72 Gato (as USS Silversides)

  • Member since
    May 2004
  • From: Mount Bretherton Model Aircraft Observatory
Posted by f8sader on Monday, May 23, 2011 1:18 PM

I will apologize at the start for bending the end of this thread.   That said, I think your question applies to all military scale modeling.  The design and use of all war making/military equipment is in itself a losing proposition.  (I'll stop the lecture there).  Wouldn't it be interesting if wars ended eons ago and we scale modelers were left to model things like farm equipment and commercial ships?

It is the history that draws me to scale modeling along with the gift my Dad gave me for appreciating the lines of mechanical designs.  Example: the Tiger 1 tank design has a certain look that I can further study by holding it in my hands.  There are none available at local museums.  This is the same with any military ship, plane, etc.  You can appreciate the design while building a model as well as the history.  The younger generation can learn by asking questions about the stuff we build and get some history at the same time.  (If we can interupt their GaGa and video games!)

Lon-ski

  • Member since
    January 2003
  • From: Washington, DC
Posted by TomZ2 on Monday, May 23, 2011 5:56 PM

f8sader

Wouldn't it be interesting if wars ended eons ago and we scale modelers were left to model things like farm equipment and commercial ships?

“I wish everyone was peaceful. Then I could take over the planet with a butter knife”—Dogbert

—Or a handy carrier battle group!

Occasional factual, grammatical, or spelling variations are inherent to this thesis and should not be considered as defects, as they enhance the individuality and character of this document.

  • Member since
    August 2008
Posted by tankerbuilder on Saturday, June 11, 2011 5:44 PM

I will pipe in again to consider those later comments, (the last couple of posts)I have thought about that too .What would we build if not armor , warships and planes.Well , I have converted liners to carriers and I have converted the BISMARK and some others to liners .They don,t look all that weird either .I was taught in school to look at the LOGICAL PROGRESSION OF DESIGN and I have seen it more often or not in warplanes ,ships , and armor. Sure history plays a great part in this  .After all how many folks are taught about the EDMUND FITZGERALD or NORMANDIE in school anymore ? The IOWAS were still seen on T.V. during DESERT STORM surrounded by the sheer frightening light of their weapons when they supported the land forces , so there you have it . Does a liner produce that kind of powerful, and yes destructive power of the BATTLESHIP in pictures? NO ! Besides the large civilian carrying ships of today hold neither beauty or panache , they are boat shaped barges with a mall , hotel and casino and theater contained within . Would they ever outlast the kind of seas the real ships did ? NO WAY !!     tankerbuilder

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.