SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

world war 2 support ships

10353 views
33 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    August 2013
world war 2 support ships
Posted by trapperray on Sunday, September 8, 2013 6:03 PM

As the title implies I am looking for suppoet ships in 1/700 scale and they have to be u.s. ships can anyone give me some ideas.  I am building up task force 38.

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: Denver, Colorado
Posted by waynec on Sunday, September 8, 2013 10:54 PM
Loose Cannon Loose Cannon Models

Никто не Забыт    (No one is Forgotten)
Ничто не Забыто  (Nothing is Forgotten)

 

  • Member since
    August 2013
Posted by trapperray on Sunday, September 8, 2013 11:03 PM

should have given more info on my request for support ships in 1/700 I am looking for oil tenders and the like, destroyers aint a problem other tan going cross eyed, but I love it.

  • Member since
    November 2009
  • From: Twin Cities of Minnesota
Posted by Don Stauffer on Monday, September 9, 2013 8:34 AM

There is a 1:700 scale liberty ship available- I think Trumpeter.

Don Stauffer in Minnesota

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Monday, September 9, 2013 11:17 PM

You (OP) are probably limited to the resin market, as I don't believe there is a TF38-era AO in injection-moulded.  I want to remember that there's a resin ATF

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Monday, September 9, 2013 11:34 PM

Trumpeter has a 1/700 SS Jeremiah O'Brien Liberty ship

Trumpeter has a 1/700 SS John W. Brown Liberty Ship

Skywave has a 1/700 USS Bootes (AK-99) liberty ship commissioned into the USN. The rest I can find are in resin. As for the liberty ships many were used in the Pacific.  

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:32 AM

Hey Trapper, did you even look at Wayne's link? Check out the Other Ships -> Auxiliaries section.

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    May 2010
Posted by amphib on Tuesday, September 10, 2013 5:27 AM

I believe the models of the O'Brien and Brown are 1/350 scale as is the Revell model of the USS Montrose.

  • Member since
    May 2003
  • From: Greenville, NC
Posted by jtilley on Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:06 AM

Trumpeter makes Liberty ships in both 1/700 and 1/350 scales.  I believe the old Revell attack transport kit was a somewhere in the vicinity of 1/400 - as was the old Revell T-2 tanker, which was marketed for a while as a Navy oiler.  

A long time ago Renwal made an attack transport and an attack cargo ship on 1/500.  Those kits are long-gone, and fetch high prices on the web.  And Revell made a seaplane carrier in about 1/400, and issued its C-3 freighter for a while as (inaccurately) a Navy cargo ship.  So far as I know, those are the only plastic kits for U.S. Navy auxiliary ships.  In resin the situation is a bit better - but not a lot.

This is a big gap that I wish the manufacturers would have enough interest to fill.

Youth, talent, hard work, and enthusiasm are no match for old age and treachery.

  • Member since
    August 2013
Posted by trapperray on Tuesday, September 10, 2013 3:23 PM

thanks for the suggestions, will look into the trumpeter liberty ships, for with a bit of modifying and some colorful language I should come up with the necessary aux. ships.

  • Member since
    June 2004
  • From: 29° 58' N 95° 21' W
Posted by seasick on Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:43 PM

Many liberty ships were used as auxiliaries, if you go to www.navsource.org you can find photos of ship and modifying the plastic kits shouldn't be difficult.

Chasing the ultimate build.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Friday, September 13, 2013 1:59 AM

I am somewhat "pissed"as I previously thought that I had posted a fairly long and well researched response here.

No matter, but to short speak about Revell:

T-2- "J.L. Hanna", "San Juan Capistrano", "Esso Glasgow".

C-3- "Dr. Lykes", "Hawaiian Pilot".

VC-2- "Montrose", "Randall"

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Sunday, September 15, 2013 11:59 PM

It would help if we had a TOE for TF38.  This is further complicated by TF38 actually being three separate units.  One of which (TF38.2 maybe--fickle memory) having an amphibious assault force temporarily attached.

The primary expendable for a combat TF is fuel, so the primary support ship will be an AO--an oiler equipped for underway replenishment ("UnRep" is the USN term-of-art).

Any other needed ship would be sent separately to rendezvous with the TF at some other location.  

The reason for that is in relative speed.   A TF, particularly a carrier-based TF needs to operate at speed beyond "best composite fuel cruise speed"--this is especially true for Flight Operations,  where 30kt speed is needful.

For WWII Amphib groups, those ere laden with support ships.  Ships like LST, and LSI were particularly slow, with best-fuel cruise speeds of 9-10kt, which was slower than the 14-16kt speeds of APD, AK, AP, and the like.  Or the 13-15kt Liberties (which was also why "Victory" ships were much preferred, as they cruised in the 14-18kt range).

  • Member since
    May 2010
Posted by amphib on Monday, September 16, 2013 6:10 AM

Just to put this in the proper perspective in the 1960s, just before the introduction of helicopters, the ships required to move an entire Marine Battalion Landing Team (BLT) consisted of (2) APAs (1) AKA (1) LSD (1) Modern (1176 class) LST. In addition if the deployment was to the Caribbean there would be (1) APD. If the deployment was to the Med one additional LSD would be substituted for the APD. These constituted an amphibious squadron. The replenishment ships (usually an oiler and a stores ship) would meet up with the squadron at intervals but never traveled with it. Except for occasional training exercises the squadron never had an attached escort of destroyers or a carrier.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Wednesday, September 18, 2013 12:24 AM

Amphib brings up a germane point.  We now use ships like AOR AOE  to rotate supplies in to keep units on station better/long than before.  

Also the standards for expendable items--particularly perishable foodstuffs have changed since the late '40s

There was some experimentation in the '60s in creating task units, particularly, CVBG, that integrated AF and AR with an AO or AOE.  This was good on paper, but had very practical problems in actual practice.  Some rather special engineering to create, to manufacture, an oiler capable of Fleet operations (ah, the Sacramentos).  The problem being, you need to separate them from the Battle group to better disperse your high-value targets.  But, the only way to do that is to divide your screening force.

  • Member since
    May 2010
Posted by amphib on Wednesday, September 18, 2013 5:51 AM

I will bring up another point that would have started instantaneous arguments at any bar in Norfolk. Just who are the support ships? For an amphibious landing the primary battle group were the amphibious ships. The purpose of the exercise was to get the marines ashore. The battleships were just along to provide gunfire SUPPORT.

The highest state of readiness for an APA or AKA was condition 1Alpha. In this condition the ship was at general quarters but approximately a quarter of the crew were manning the boats and not on board and the ship was at anchor. The guns were manned by the stewards and storekeepers. The bosuns still on board were manning the cargo winches. Our stewards were consistently the best gunners on the 40MMs.

So for you guys who are looking to model support ships look for the oilers and stores ships, leave the amphibious ships in a class by themselves.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Wednesday, September 18, 2013 7:53 AM

"Stop disrespectin' mah gators!" in other words

(even though WWII predated most true amphibs)

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:37 PM

TW for the Win! <G>

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:15 PM

I'm a gator fan :)

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, September 20, 2013 7:53 AM

Both of my boys (and one daughter-in-law) served on Gator Freighters during their enlistments in addition to other ships (DDGs and CGs) and much preferred the amphibs. I don't know, those cracker boxes don't seem to be very good rides in heavy seas.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Friday, September 20, 2013 9:49 AM

I would think you would have that opinion of any surface ship! ;)

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, September 20, 2013 10:23 AM

Actually Tracy, I was a surface sailor. I only "fixed" submarines, among others.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    August 2005
  • From: EG48
Posted by Tracy White on Friday, September 20, 2013 10:39 AM

I wasn't actually sure, but I figure the joke was worth the risk. ;)

Tracy White Researcher@Large

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Friday, September 20, 2013 6:09 PM

Hey, no sweat! But I know a lot of sub sailors and they say even at 400 feet that a sub will still roll sickeningly during heavy weather that's on the surface.  I didn't have too much of that stuff on aircraft carriers.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by pyrman64 on Saturday, September 21, 2013 7:24 AM

Here's a bit of scutlebutt (I mean TO&E) on Task Force 38. http://pacific.valka.cz/forces/tf38.htm 

 

As for you swabby-types, I'm a land-lubber.  I have to admit I was well treated by the medical staff and crew aboard the USS Iwo Jima back in 11/83.  Merci et que Dieu vous bénisse Toast

Sub: which carrier and when?

Greg H

"There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but, boys, it is all hell." Gen. Wm T. Sherman (11 April 1880, Columbus, Ohio)

  • Member since
    March 2004
  • From: Spartanburg, SC
Posted by subfixer on Saturday, September 21, 2013 7:57 AM

When on active duty: Ranger CVA-61 1972-1975    Lexington CVT-16 1975-1976 and did limited duty on Theodore Chandler DD-717.

I  did repairs on Coral Sea, Forrestal, Independence, America, Kennedy and every nuclear carrier the USN has, nuclear cruisers, too. Went out on sea trials on many of those boats. I can't remember all the subs I've worked on without a list. I'm retired now.

Oh, I did repairs on the Iwo Jima, your temporary home.

I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

  • Member since
    May 2005
Posted by pyrman64 on Saturday, September 21, 2013 9:16 AM

Sub: Thank you for your service!  

I really appreciate the medical treatment I rec'd on the Iwo Jima.....but after 3-days, I just had to get back to my brothers on shore despite the head wound.

A co-worker's grandfather served about The Blue Ghost during WWII - he was a radar operator and was aboard when she was hit by the kamikaze.

Another co-worker was a BT aboard the USS Gregory (DD-802) in the late-50s..

Greg H

"There is many a boy here today who looks on war as all glory, but, boys, it is all hell." Gen. Wm T. Sherman (11 April 1880, Columbus, Ohio)

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Monday, September 23, 2013 11:34 PM

pyrman64
(I mean TO&E) on Task Force 38. http://pacific.valka.cz/forces/tf38.htm 

It's a good link, but does not offer a lot of detail on the support ships involved.

Very detailed on the combatant vessels and their actions, though.

  • Member since
    November 2005
  • From: Formerly Bryan, now Arlington, Texas
Posted by CapnMac82 on Monday, September 23, 2013 11:41 PM

After small boats, I went over to Amphib; boat operations before beach logistics.  All that before taking up this information warfare business.  Which is a dilemma now that I these Information Dominance "wings."  But, to wear them, I have to displace either my SWO water wings or my OIC Small Craft badge.  Both of which have been with me for my my entire career.  Harumph.

  • Member since
    September 2012
Posted by GMorrison on Monday, September 23, 2013 11:54 PM

My friend George collects and restores line cannons for a hobby. How bout that?

 Modeling is an excuse to buy books.

 

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.