SEARCH FINESCALE.COM

Enter keywords or a search phrase below:

locking old posts

2117 views
9 replies
1 rating 2 rating 3 rating 4 rating 5 rating
  • Member since
    July 2013
locking old posts
Posted by DURR on Monday, June 16, 2014 10:36 AM

i have posts going back about 12 yrs.  i know in the past yes i was guilty of replying to/digging up old posts.

lately there has been a  great interest in the fact that there are too many posts. if a post is locked say after 12-18 months it would help

  • Member since
    March 2003
  • From: Western North Carolina
Posted by Tojo72 on Monday, June 16, 2014 10:54 AM

nothing wrong with digging up an occasional old post,some have some worthwhile information that never goes bad

  • Member since
    April 2006
  • From: ON, Canada
Posted by jgeratic on Monday, June 16, 2014 11:04 AM

I was thinking the same thing, some old posts could have information that is still relevant today.  Locking it would result in duplicate threads being created.  

The only negative I see of an old post is sometimes picture links no longer work, or an original participant might not be around to respond to new postings.

regards,

Jack

  • Member since
    December 2013
Posted by CodyJ on Monday, June 16, 2014 7:57 PM

I can see where you are coming from on some posts.  Some question that was asked 5 years ago is suddenly answered today and the guy who asked the question in the first place isn't even here anymore.  

  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Monday, June 16, 2014 8:43 PM

digging up old posts is great  lots of info but... too many "good job"   "nice"  etc... just ties up the whole system

  • Member since
    September 2006
  • From: Bethlehem PA
Posted by the Baron on Tuesday, June 17, 2014 1:30 PM

I don't mind an old post getting revived, I agree with the others.

DURR

... too many "good job"   "nice"  etc... just ties up the whole system

That's an argument for a Like feature, that allows members to express approval without having to attach a post to the thread.

The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.

 

 

  • Member since
    July 2013
Posted by DURR on Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:09 PM

baron that is a cool idea

  • Member since
    August 2007
  • From: back country of SO-CAL, at the birth place of Naval Aviation
Posted by DUSTER on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:42 AM

Gee We could then be Face Scale Modeling Propeller

Steve

Building the perfect model---just not quite yet  Confused

  • Member since
    July 2004
  • From: Sonora Desert
Posted by stikpusher on Wednesday, June 18, 2014 11:06 AM

DUSTER

Gee We could then be Face Scale Modeling Propeller

No 

 

F is for FIRE, That burns down the whole town!

U is for URANIUM... BOMBS!

N is for NO SURVIVORS...

       - Plankton

LSM

 

  • Member since
    December 2002
  • From: Fort Knox
Posted by Rob Gronovius on Saturday, June 21, 2014 10:03 AM

Tojo72

nothing wrong with digging up an occasional old post,some have some worthwhile information that never goes bad

Digging up old posts for old information or adding new information to an old post isn't really the problem. The problem is when someone replies to an 8 year old post like it was made 20 minutes ago. Then half a dozen people add responses until someone notices the date of the question. Often times the original question was answered 8 years ago and the original poster is long gone.

For some reason the new person digging up the old post never seems to realize the age of the post or that they are giving the same answer that was posted several times originally. It kind of makes them look clueless.

JOIN OUR COMMUNITY!

Our community is FREE to join. To participate you must either login or register for an account.

SEARCH FORUMS
FREE NEWSLETTER
By signing up you may also receive reader surveys and occasional special offers. We do not sell, rent or trade our email lists. View our Privacy Policy.