the Baron
stikpusher
Isn’t that what the “Your Photos” tab of the profile is? And if that is, how do you upload photos there?
Excellent question, Stik! You may be right-that feature may be the gallery we're talking about.
And as far as uploading goes, that's an excellent question, too. When I go to my Your Photos page, I see a message that says, "the Baron hasn't uploaded any photos yet." Not, "You haven't", but referring to me in the third person, as if I were some other user, not the owner of the page. What I expected to see was some link to use to add photos.
This is a good question for the moderators/admins-How does "Your Photos" work?
Hi Baron and Stik,
So, this is a little complicated, but I'll do my best to explain it. For years, submitting photos to the FSM Reader Gallery through the website meant that the photos would be routed to an associate editor. That editor would go through the submissions, choose some for the print edition and the rest would be moved to another editor whose responsibility it was to upload the rest onto the online Reader Gallery. In fact, for about four years, that was one of my responsibilities.
This is why you see Elizabeth's name beneath photos in the Online Reader Gallery; or mine; or if you go back further, Megan and Kelly's.
But that means the ability to upload photos directly to the Reader Gallery is restricted to staff. Over on Scale Auto, because we didn't run a Reader Gallery in the print magazine, there was no reason to insert editorial into the mix except to moderate submissions.
Can we change that? Possibly. But that would mean a major change to FSM's internal workflow. Expecting readers to submit in two different places will not work, and we have too much to do already to go hunting through archived photos to populate Reader Gallery. Being at the mouth of the river, as it were, is best. So, the staff would have to dig into that first.
Then we would need to open a ticket with our web development department. I don't know if that's simply flicking a soft switch or requires some coding. From how it's written into our website, I'm going to assume the latter.
Third, our web development department is in the middle of a huge, months long lift with Discover, Astronomy, and all of our tracks titles: Trains, Model Railroader, Classic Trains, Classic Toy Trains, and MRVP and the work on the omnibus website Trains.com. That's why it takes longer than we would typically expect for bugs to be worked out on the Forum right now. Resources and manpower are tight, and we have to work with what we have.
Often, what appears to be an easy change from the outside, even to the trained eyes of software testers and engineers and career web developers, is more complicated once you're on the other side.
My main concern right now is to get all the little hiccups that we've been experiencing straightened out. Still, we'll endeavor to get the bugs worked out and consider ways to improve the FSM Forum.
TL/DR: We can look at it, but it's not on the docket anytime soon.
Thanks,
Tim